Brent crude has surged 22% to $88/barrel since February, delivering windfall profits for US energy companies despite reduced regional output. ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips face significant exposure in Qatar LNG and UAE operations, with attacks damaging critical infrastructure and reducing supply volumes by 30-40%.
US Oil Giants Face Billion-Dollar Windfall Amid Growing Gulf Security Risks
Sell less oil at much higher prices, and the bottom line swells.
So these companies are making record profits right now, but you're saying they're actually producing less oil from the Gulf. How does that work?
Oil prices have spiked 22 percent since the war started in February. When you sell less at much higher prices, the math works in your favor—at least in the short term. Chevron posted $12 billion in a single quarter.
But that's a temporary condition, right? The higher prices are because supply is constrained. If the war ends and the Strait of Hormuz reopens, prices fall, and suddenly those companies are back to lower volumes at lower prices.
Exactly. And that's why the analysts are worried about the long-term picture. ExxonMobil's upstream earnings dropped $1.3 billion in the first half of 2026 compared to the same period last year, just from lower volumes in the Middle East.
Which companies are actually hurting the most right now?
ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips. They have major stakes in Qatar's LNG projects, and those facilities have been hit hard. Damage to LNG trains at Ras Laffan alone will take three to five years to repair and cost around $3 billion.
Wait—is that $3 billion the company's cost, or the total repair cost? Because if it's the total, ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips are splitting it with QatarEnergy and other partners.
Good catch. It's the total repair cost. The companies are partners in these joint ventures, so the burden is shared. But that doesn't make the disruption less real.
What about the human cost? I saw something about an explosion in Qatar.
In June, an explosion at the Barzan gas project killed at least 13 people. ExxonMobil holds a stake in that project. The official cause was listed as a technical malfunction, but it happened in the middle of an active conflict zone.
So we know 13 people died, but we don't know if the conflict created conditions that made the accident more likely, or if it was purely mechanical.
Right. The conflict has created chaos and reduced maintenance capacity, but the specific cause of that explosion was technical.
What happens if this war drags on for years?
Then you're looking at delayed expansion projects worth billions, reduced supply growth, and companies reassessing whether their Gulf investments are worth the risk. ExxonMobil's $10 billion Upper Zakum expansion could be pushed back indefinitely.
But higher oil prices also create incentive to keep investing, because the returns are better. So there's a tension there.
Absolutely. The companies are caught between record profits today and the real possibility that their infrastructure won't be there tomorrow.
El Pulso
- Brent crude surged from $72 to $88 per barrel (22%) since February 28 war start
- ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips face 30-40% supply reductions from the Gulf region
- At least 172 attacks on nonmilitary infrastructure across Gulf Cooperation Council countries; 48% targeted energy facilities
- Damage to Qatar LNG trains will take 3-5 years to repair at estimated cost of $3 billion
- At least 13 people killed in June explosion at Qatar's Barzan gas project
Brent crude has surged 22% to $88/barrel since February, delivering windfall profits for US energy companies despite reduced regional output. ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips face significant exposure in Qatar LNG and UAE operations, with attacks damaging critical infrastructure and reducing supply volumes by 30-40%.
Six months into the Iran conflict, US oil firms have posted record profits from rising crude prices, but their Gulf investments face mounting risk from attacks on energy infrastructure and supply disruptions.
Six months into the war with Iran, American oil companies are printing money. Brent crude has climbed from $72 to $88 a barrel—a 22 percent jump since late February—and the major producers have posted their fattest quarterly earnings since 2022. Chevron reported $12 billion in adjusted earnings in a single quarter. ExxonMobil's upstream division, despite taking a $1.3 billion hit from Middle Eastern disruptions in the first half of the year, has more than made up the difference at the pump. The arithmetic is simple: sell less oil at much higher prices, and the bottom line swells.
But there is a darker arithmetic running parallel. The Strait of Hormuz, the chokepoint through which one-fifth of the world's oil and gas moved before the war began on February 28, has been largely closed to commercial traffic. Iran and Oman agreed last week to a temporary maritime route, but Iran says the strait will not fully reopen until the United States honors commitments under a lapsed interim peace deal. No one knows when that happens, or if it happens at all. For the oil companies, this means their actual production from the Gulf region is collapsing even as their profits soar. Analysts at Rystad Energy estimate that US companies' share of gas supplies from the region will fall by around 40 percent this year compared to last, and their share of oil supplies by 30 to 35 percent. The windfall is real. So is the vulnerability.
The exposure varies sharply by company. Chevron has only 5 percent of its global output in the Arab Gulf, so the closure of the strait barely touches it. ExxonMobil is a different story. Its operations in Qatar and the United Arab Emirates account for 20 percent of its global upstream supply. The company has been a major partner in Qatar's liquefied natural gas sector for decades, holding stakes in several joint ventures tied to the expansion of the North Field, the world's largest natural gas field. It also holds a 28 percent stake in the UAE's Upper Zakum offshore oilfield. ConocoPhillips joined Qatar's North Field expansion projects in 2022. Occidental Petroleum operates Oman's largest producing oilfield and holds interests in UAE gas projects. Chevron, smaller in the region, operates oil assets in the Saudi-Kuwait Partitioned Zone and is exploring routes to move Iraqi crude to Mediterranean terminals, sidestepping the strait entirely.
Since the war began, Iran and Iran-backed groups have carried out at least 172 attacks on nonmilitary infrastructure across the six Gulf Cooperation Council countries, according to the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data project, an independent conflict monitor. Nearly half of those strikes—48 percent—have targeted energy infrastructure: oil and gas facilities, power plants, desalination plants. The UAE, Kuwait, and Bahrain have suffered the highest number of successful strikes. Kuwait's Mina Abdullah and Mina al-Ahmadi refineries have been hit. So have the Bahrain Petroleum Company refinery, ADNOC's al-Ruwais Industrial City, and the Habshan gas complex. In July, a drone struck the Abqaiq processing complex in Saudi Arabia, one of the most critical nodes in the kingdom's oil infrastructure, handling more than seven million barrels per day.
The damage to Qatar's Ras Laffan Industrial City, the world's largest LNG export hub, has been particularly severe. In March, repeated attacks forced the plant to halt production entirely. Damage to LNG trains 4 and 6 at Rasgas destroyed roughly 13 million tonnes of capacity and will take three to five years to repair, with an estimated cost of around $3 billion. In June, an explosion at Qatar's Barzan gas project, where ExxonMobil holds a stake, killed at least 13 people. The company's share of LNG supply from Qatar is expected to fall to about four million tonnes this year, down from 13 million tonnes last year. ConocoPhillips has seen its volumes drop to one million tonne from 2.5 million tonnes. Occidental Petroleum's Shah gas project in the UAE, where the company holds a 40 percent stake, was damaged by drone attacks in March that caused a fire and halted operations. ExxonMobil's Upper Zakum production was reduced between March and May when export routes were disrupted. In Iraq, a drone attack hit the Sarsang oilfield in March, followed by an explosion at one of its storage facilities in April.
For oilfield service companies—SLB, Halliburton, and Baker Hughes—the picture is mixed. These firms provide drilling technologies, equipment, and operational expertise to Saudi Aramco, ADNOC, and QatarEnergy across the region. Second-quarter Middle East revenues were down 8 to 10 percent compared with the previous year across the three companies, pressured by higher logistical costs, supply-chain disruptions, and delayed projects. Higher oil prices have lifted revenues elsewhere, but the Gulf operations are bleeding.
The paradox is now fully visible. ExxonMobil's planned $10 billion Upper Zakum and Qatar LNG expansions could face delays. ConocoPhillips remains exposed through its planned 42 percent stake in BP's Kirkuk operations in Iraq, a higher-risk market. Chevron and Occidental Petroleum, with presence in less volatile countries like Israel and Oman, face less severe exposure. For all of them, the question is no longer whether higher prices can offset lower volumes—they can, for now—but whether the infrastructure will still be standing when the war ends. President Trump has repeatedly warned Iran against restricting access to the Strait of Hormuz, insisting the waterway must remain open to global commerce. For companies with billions of dollars invested across the Gulf, the challenge is simpler and harder: keeping the shipments moving means nothing if there is nothing left to ship.
Citas Notables
Overall we expect US companies' share of gas supplies from the region to fall by around 40 percent this year compared to last year, and the share of oil supplies to drop by 30-35 percent.— Rahul Choudhary, vice president of Upstream Research at Rystad Energy
Oil and gas facilities, power plants and water desalination plants are likely to remain key targets for Iran because disruption to these sectors can increase economic pressure on Gulf states, while disruption to global energy supplies increases prices and pressure on the US during periods of escalation.— Nasser Khdour, Middle East assistant research manager at Armed Conflict Location and Event Data