A two-day-old ceasefire between US and Iran has halted air strikes but failed to end the Strait of Hormuz blockade, causing unprecedented disruption to global oil supplies. Vice President JD Vance is heading to Pakistan for talks while warning Iran not to 'play' the US; both sides accuse each other of ceasefire violations in Lebanon.
US-Iran peace talks set for Islamabad as Strait of Hormuz blockade persists
A ceasefire that is not quite holding.
Why does the Strait of Hormuz matter so much that its blockade is being called the biggest disruption to global energy supplies ever?
Because roughly a third of all seaborne oil passes through it. Before the war, 140 ships a day moved through. Now it's sealed except for Iranian vessels. That's not just a Middle East problem—it's a global one. Every economy that depends on oil feels it immediately.
But there's a ceasefire. Why hasn't that reopened the strait?
Because a ceasefire between the US and Iran doesn't automatically mean Iran stops blocking it. Iran sees control of the strait as leverage—it's one of their demands at the negotiating table. They want sanctions lifted and recognition of their authority over it. They're not going to give that up for free.
What about the fighting in Lebanon? Is that part of the ceasefire or not?
That's the contradiction at the heart of this. Iran says it is. Israel and the US say it isn't. But Israel just announced it would negotiate separately with Lebanon about disarming Hezbollah. So they're trying to have it both ways—claim the ceasefire doesn't cover Lebanon while also negotiating to end the Lebanon conflict.
What does Iran actually want from these talks in Islamabad?
Sanctions lifted, control over the strait, and recognition as a regional power. They're not backing down. Their Supreme Leader just issued a statement saying they won't leave the aggressors unpunished. That's not the language of someone ready to surrender.
And what does the US want?
Iran to give up its enriched uranium, stop enriching more, abandon its missile program, and stop supporting regional allies like Hezbollah. Basically, to disarm. Those two positions are almost irreconcilable.
So why are they even talking?
Because the alternative is the war continues, the strait stays closed, and the global economy keeps bleeding. Sometimes you negotiate not because you think you'll get what you want, but because the cost of not negotiating is worse.
O Pulso
- Strait of Hormuz blockade has caused the largest disruption to global oil supplies in history
- Israeli strikes on Lebanon killed over 250 people; approximately one-fifth of Lebanon's population displaced
- Iran demands sanctions relief and control of the Strait; US seeks uranium surrender and missile program abandonment
- Vice President JD Vance leading US delegation to Islamabad; Iran's Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf heading Iranian team
- Before the war, 140 ships passed through the strait daily; now only Iranian vessels move freely
A two-day-old ceasefire between US and Iran has halted air strikes but failed to end the Strait of Hormuz blockade, causing unprecedented disruption to global oil supplies. Vice President JD Vance is heading to Pakistan for talks while warning Iran not to 'play' the US; both sides accuse each other of ceasefire violations in Lebanon.
The US and Iran are set to begin their first peace talks in Islamabad despite a fragile ceasefire, as the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz continues to disrupt global energy supplies and parallel conflicts rage in Lebanon.
A ceasefire that is not quite holding. On Friday, the Strait of Hormuz remained sealed—a chokepoint through which, before the war, roughly 140 ships passed each day carrying up to 20 million barrels of crude oil. Now only Iranian vessels moved freely. A single Iranian supertanker, capable of carrying 2 million barrels, was among the few to cross. The blockade has created the largest disruption to global energy supplies in modern history, yet the two-day-old truce between the United States and Iran had done almost nothing to reopen it.
The ceasefire itself was fragile, undermined almost immediately by accusations of bad faith from both sides. Israel and Hezbollah continued trading fire in Lebanon—Israeli forces had launched one of the war's heaviest strikes just hours after the truce was announced, killing more than 250 people in densely populated areas. Iran said this violated the agreement. The United States and Israel countered that Lebanon was never part of the deal. Yet on Thursday, Israel shifted course, announcing it would open separate negotiations with the Lebanese government aimed at disarming Hezbollah and ending the conflict. The contradiction hung in the air: a ceasefire that did not cover the war still raging.
President Donald Trump, impatient, took to social media to accuse Iran of doing a "very poor job" of allowing oil through the strait. "That is not the agreement we have!" he wrote. Vice President JD Vance, preparing to leave for Islamabad, struck a different note in public—measured, but with an edge. "We're looking forward to the negotiation. I think it's going to be positive," he told reporters. Then the warning: "If they're going to try to play us, then they're going to find the negotiating team is not that receptive." He was heading to Pakistan, where the first substantive talks between the two countries would begin on Saturday.
Islamabad had been locked down for the occasion. A three-kilometer security perimeter, a "red zone," had been established around the Serena Hotel in the city's center, where both delegations would stay. Pakistani officials said little about the arrival of Iran's delegation, led by Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf. Vance's team was expected to arrive in time for Saturday's opening. Advance teams from both countries were already in place, and Pakistan—which had mediated the ceasefire—was relaying messages between them on Friday. A Pakistani source close to the discussions said everything was on track, and noted that the reduction in violence in Lebanon was "a good sign."
But the gap between what each side wanted remained vast. Iran's demands included the lifting of sanctions and recognition of its authority over the Strait of Hormuz itself—the right to control access and levy transit fees on passing ships. Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, who had not appeared in public since taking office after his father's death on the first day of the war, issued a defiant statement on Thursday. "We will certainly not leave unpunished the criminal aggressors who attacked our country," he said. The United States, by contrast, was expected to push Iran to surrender its enriched uranium, halt further enrichment, abandon its missile program, and end support for regional allies. Trump had declared victory in the conflict, yet Iran still possessed missiles and drones capable of striking neighboring countries and held more than 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels. Its clerical leadership remained intact despite internal unrest.
The human toll of the war continued to mount. In Lebanon, Israeli military operations had displaced roughly one-fifth of the population. On Friday morning, Israeli forces struck 10 rocket launchers in Lebanese territory. Hezbollah responded with a missile toward Israel, triggering air raid sirens. The group had initially signaled it would pause attacks under the ceasefire but resumed fighting after Israeli strikes earlier in the week. Hezbollah said it had targeted Israeli military infrastructure in the northern city of Haifa.
Meanwhile, the economic impact was beginning to show. Consumer price data for March, due to be released later on Friday, was expected to reflect the war's early toll on inflation. The blockade of the strait, the displacement of hundreds of thousands, the continued military operations—all of it was feeding into the machinery of global commerce and cost. The talks in Islamabad would determine whether any of it could be unwound, or whether the ceasefire would simply be a pause before the fighting resumed.
Citações Notáveis
We're looking forward to the negotiation. I think it's going to be positive. If they're going to try to play us, then they're going to find the negotiating team is not that receptive.— Vice President JD Vance
We will certainly not leave unpunished the criminal aggressors who attacked our country.— Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei