In the long and grinding effort to bring Russia's war in Ukraine toward some form of resolution, US special envoy Steve Witkoff traveled to St. Petersburg to present Vladimir Putin with peace proposals shaped in Oslo alongside Ukraine's Zelensky and European partners. The moment carried both cautious hope and deep uncertainty — intelligence cooperation between Washington and Kyiv had been quietly restored, yet the Trump administration's own mixed signals about Ukraine's future cast a shadow over the diplomacy. Beneath the formal meetings, the human cost continued to accumulate, with drone stri
US envoy heads to Putin as Ukraine-America intelligence ties improve
We can hear when ballistics is coming—we are thankful now it works
So Witkoff is carrying these Oslo proposals to Putin. What exactly are they proposing?
The reporting doesn't spell out the specific proposals—that's being kept close. What we know is that Zelensky and the Europeans say genuine progress was made, but they're not detailing what's on the table.
Right, and that's important. We're told there's "strong alignment" and "constructive" talks, but those are descriptor words, not substance. The actual terms remain opaque.
Zelensky says intelligence sharing is working now. That's a big shift from accusing the US of withholding it.
It is. He was very specific about it—early warning of ballistic missiles means civilians can reach shelter. For a country being attacked daily, that's life-and-death stuff. He sounded genuinely relieved.
But we should note: Rubio admitted Patriot missiles haven't arrived yet. So while intelligence sharing may be restored, the military aid picture is still incomplete. The US is saying nothing was intentionally denied, but the fact remains Ukraine doesn't have what it needs.
What about Russia's position?
Lavrov said they'll listen but ruled out political concessions. Putin hasn't commented publicly. Russia controls about 20 percent of Ukrainian territory and seems to be in a waiting posture.
That's the asymmetry here. Russia can afford to wait. Ukraine is losing people every day—twelve killed just this week in drone strikes. The pressure to negotiate is on Kyiv, not Moscow.
Trump's been saying Ukraine needs a new president. How does that play into this?
It's creating real tension. Zelensky is trying to negotiate from a position of strength, but the American president is publicly undermining him, saying it's time for someone else to lead Ukraine's negotiations.
And Vance is calling Ukraine a "partner" rather than an ally, arguing they should stop hitting Russian energy targets. That's a fundamentally different framing than what Zelensky needs to hear from Washington right now.
Are the Europeans worried?
Very. Merz is trying to convince Washington that this is a joint responsibility, not something to be settled bilaterally between the US and Russia. Støre is insisting Europe needs to be at the table.
They're right to worry. If the US negotiates a settlement without European input, Europe still has to live with the consequences. That's why Merz is emphasizing the cost to European budgets.
The Pulse
- Russian drone strikes killed at least twelve people across Ukraine this week — in Kyiv, Donetsk, Dnipro, and Kharkiv — as diplomats met in Oslo and St. Petersburg to discuss ending the very war producing those casualties.
- A weeks-long rupture over US intelligence sharing had left Ukraine dangerously exposed to Russian missile attacks, and Zelensky's audible relief at its restoration underscored just how high the stakes of American cooperation truly are.
- Ukraine is pressing for security guarantees, Patriot air-defense missiles, and uninterrupted Starlink access — none of which have been fully delivered — while Russia signals it will listen to proposals but concede nothing politically.
- Trump's public suggestion that Ukraine find a new president to negotiate, combined with Vance's reluctance to call Kyiv an ally, is alarming European leaders who fear the US may be preparing to pressure Ukraine into unfavorable terms.
- European leaders from Germany, Finland, and Norway are insisting they must have a seat at any peace table, pushing back against the possibility of a bilateral US-Russia arrangement that sidelines the continent bearing much of the war's burden.
In the long and grinding effort to bring Russia's war in Ukraine toward some form of resolution, US special envoy Steve Witkoff traveled to St. Petersburg to present Vladimir Putin with peace proposals shaped in Oslo alongside Ukraine's Zelensky and European partners. The moment carried both cautious hope and deep uncertainty — intelligence cooperation between Washington and Kyiv had been quietly restored, yet the Trump administration's own mixed signals about Ukraine's future cast a shadow over the diplomacy. Beneath the formal meetings, the human cost continued to accumulate, with drone strikes claiming lives across Ukrainian cities even as negotiators searched for common ground.
Steve Witkoff arrived in St. Petersburg on Wednesday to sit across from Vladimir Putin, carrying proposals shaped the day before in Oslo alongside Ukraine's President Zelensky, Finland's Alexander Stubb, and Norway's Jonas Gahr Støre. The visit represented one of the most direct diplomatic exchanges of the war's latest phase — but it unfolded against a backdrop of continued violence. Russian drone strikes killed at least twelve people across Ukraine this week, including civilians in Kyiv, Donetsk, Dnipro, and Kharkiv.
The Oslo meeting had produced at least one tangible shift: a restoration of US intelligence sharing on Russian ballistic missile attacks. Weeks earlier, Ukraine had publicly accused Washington of withholding critical warnings — a charge the US called scandalous. By Tuesday, Zelensky's tone had changed. "We can hear when ballistics is coming," he said, expressing genuine relief. For a country under constant aerial bombardment, early warning is not an abstraction — it is the margin between shelter and death.
Zelensky also restated Ukraine's readiness to negotiate while insisting his country was not losing militarily — only losing people. He flagged urgent needs: security guarantees, Patriot missiles, and reliable Starlink access, the last of which had recently been throttled in ways that alarmed a bipartisan group of US senators. Secretary of State Rubio acknowledged the Patriots had not yet arrived, though he denied any deliberate withholding.
The diplomatic picture was complicated by Washington's own contradictions. Trump had publicly suggested Ukraine needed a new president to negotiate. Vance declined to call Kyiv an ally. These signals unsettled European partners who had gathered in Oslo precisely to demonstrate unity. German Chancellor Merz argued the war's resolution was a shared transatlantic responsibility. Norway's Støre insisted Europe must be at the table in any final arrangement.
On the Russian side, Foreign Minister Lavrov said Moscow would hear Witkoff's proposals but ruled out political concessions. Putin said nothing publicly. Russia holds roughly twenty percent of Ukrainian territory and appeared content to wait — listening without yielding — as the diplomatic ground beneath the talks continued to shift.
Steve Witkoff, the US special envoy, was heading to St. Petersburg on Wednesday to sit across from Vladimir Putin and lay out a set of proposals aimed at ending Russia's war in Ukraine. The timing mattered: he was arriving fresh from talks in Oslo with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky the day before, carrying what American officials were calling a "constructive" conversation into the Russian capital.
The diplomatic moment was fragile. Weeks earlier, Ukraine had publicly accused the United States of withholding critical intelligence about Russian missile attacks—a charge Washington dismissed as "scandalous." But by Tuesday, after the Oslo meeting, Zelensky's tone had shifted. He told reporters that intelligence sharing with the Americans on Russian ballistic missiles "works now." The relief in his words was audible. "We can hear when ballistics is coming," he said, "so we are thankful to American side, now it works, it's great." For a country under constant aerial bombardment, early warning of incoming missiles meant the difference between civilians reaching shelter and civilians dying. On Tuesday alone, Russian drone strikes killed at least ten people across Ukraine—four in Kyiv and its surrounding region, four more in the eastern Donetsk region, and two in the central city of Dnipro. Another attack overnight near Kharkiv claimed two more lives.
What Zelensky and his European counterparts were signaling, though, was that the ball was now in Russia's court. Finnish President Alexander Stubb, who had participated in the Oslo talks alongside Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre, said "genuine progress" had been made on peace proposals but offered no specifics and cautioned that patience would be required. Zelensky himself restated Ukraine's readiness to negotiate, while emphasizing that his country was not losing the war militarily—it was losing people to Russian attacks. He also flagged two other critical needs: security guarantees and access to SpaceX's Starlink satellite network, which Ukraine's military had been using for drone operations but which had recently experienced speed restrictions that prompted a bipartisan group of US senators to call for an investigation.
The diplomatic choreography, however, was being complicated by signals from Washington itself. Trump had recently suggested it was time for Ukraine to find a new president and "for somebody else to negotiate on behalf of Ukraine." Vice President JD Vance, in an interview on Monday, had described Ukraine not as an ally but as "certainly a partner in some ways," while arguing that Kyiv should stop attacking Russian energy infrastructure. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, currently visiting India, acknowledged that Patriot air-defense missiles—the only effective weapon Ukraine has against Russian ballistic missiles—had not yet been delivered, though he insisted nothing had been intentionally withheld.
European leaders were watching these mixed messages with alarm. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told Bloomberg TV on Monday that he was working to convince the American government that resolving the Ukraine war was a joint European-American responsibility, not something to be negotiated away. "It's really a big effort for our budgets, it's really a big thing for the European Union, but we are doing that," he said. Norway's Støre stressed that Europe "needs to be at the table" in any discussions about ending the war.
Meanwhile, the Russian side was playing its own game. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said the Kremlin would listen to what Witkoff had to offer but ruled out "any political concessions." Putin himself had not publicly commented on the latest developments. Russia currently controls roughly 20 percent of Ukrainian territory, and Moscow's position appeared to be one of patient waiting—willing to hear proposals but not prepared to move on fundamental demands.
The Oslo talks had included Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law and another key envoy, participating via video link. A US official described the meeting as "very productive and constructive," noting "strong alignment at the working level" among the US, Ukraine, and Europe on next steps. But the gap between what was being said in Oslo and what was being said in Washington—between Zelensky's gratitude for restored intelligence sharing and Trump's public pressure for Ukraine to "make a deal"—suggested that the diplomatic ground beneath these talks was still shifting.
Notable Quotes
We can hear when ballistics is coming, so we are thankful to American side, now it works, it's great.— President Volodymyr Zelensky, on restored US intelligence sharing
Ukraine is certainly a partner in some ways, but we have some divergent interests from time to time.— Vice President JD Vance, on US-Ukraine relations