In a Los Angeles federal courtroom, a chapter of Syria's long nightmare found rare legal closure when a judge sentenced Samir Ousman al-Sheikh — former commander of Damascus's Adra prison — to 60 years for torture and immigration fraud. The conviction is the most consequential ever handed down by a foreign court against an official of Bashar al-Assad's regime, and only the fifth prosecution in American history under the extraterritorial Torture Act. It is a reminder that impunity, however patient, is not the same as permanence — and that the law can follow a man across an ocean and two decades
US court sentences ex-Syrian prison chief to 60 years for torture
Multiple torture victims suffered severe physical and psychological trauma, including chronic pain, anxiety, panic attacks, and lasting psychological scars two decades after imprisonment.
I still live in the prison of my memory
Mark
What makes this sentence historically significant? There have been other war crimes trials.
Mimi
This is the first time a senior Assad regime official has actually stood trial in person in any country. Syria's new government has held trials, but al-Assad and his brother are in Moscow. This happened in Los Angeles, with the defendant present, with victims testifying face-to-face.
Luke
But we should be clear: he was convicted under US torture law, not international war crimes law. That's a narrower charge, even if the conduct was the same.
Mark
The victims' testimony—the "magic carpet" device, the suspension from pipes—these are specific, documented methods?
Mimi
Yes. Multiple victims described the same torture techniques independently. The "magic carpet" was corroborated by several witnesses. That consistency is what allowed the jury to convict.
Luke
Though we should note: we have victim testimony and witness testimony. We don't have, say, written records from the prison itself or al-Sheikh's own documented orders. The conviction rests on eyewitness accounts, which are powerful but not the same as documentary evidence.
Mark
The judge gave him 60 years when prosecutors asked for 80. Why the gap?
Mimi
His age—he's 74—and his health were factors. The defense argued for five years. The judge found a middle ground.
Luke
And that matters because a 60-year sentence for a 74-year-old is effectively a life sentence. The judge knew that.
Mark
What happens to the broader accountability process in Syria itself?
Mimi
That's still unfolding. The new Syrian government is conducting trials. This US conviction doesn't replace that—it supplements it. It shows that even if you flee, even if you get a green card, you're not safe.
Luke
Though we should note: other factions in Syria's civil war have also been accused of detainee abuse. This case focuses on the Assad regime, which is important, but it's not the whole picture of accountability that Syria needs.
Le Pouls
- A 74-year-old former Syrian prison chief who quietly obtained a green card and applied for US citizenship was arrested at LAX in 2024, his hidden past catching up with him after nearly two decades.
- Nine days of testimony laid bare a chamber of systematic cruelty — prisoners crushed between wooden panels, suspended from pipes by their wrists, beaten with cables — all while al-Sheikh watched through closed-circuit cameras.
- Survivors carried the trial's moral weight into the courtroom: one man cannot lift his own son due to chronic back injuries; another said he still lives 'in the prison of my memory,' haunted by panic attacks and the screams of fellow prisoners.
- Prosecutors sought 80 years; defense attorneys argued for five, citing age and poor health; the judge settled on 60 — a sentence calibrated to both the enormity of the crimes and the reality of the defendant's condition.
- The verdict lands as Assad himself sits exiled in Moscow, sentenced to death in absentia by Syria's new government, signaling that the architecture of accountability — however incomplete — is slowly closing around the regime's former apparatus.
In a Los Angeles federal courtroom, a chapter of Syria's long nightmare found rare legal closure when a judge sentenced Samir Ousman al-Sheikh — former commander of Damascus's Adra prison — to 60 years for torture and immigration fraud. The conviction is the most consequential ever handed down by a foreign court against an official of Bashar al-Assad's regime, and only the fifth prosecution in American history under the extraterritorial Torture Act. It is a reminder that impunity, however patient, is not the same as permanence — and that the law can follow a man across an ocean and two decades of silence.
On a Thursday morning in Los Angeles, a federal judge sentenced Samir Ousman al-Sheikh, 74, to 60 years in prison for torture and immigration fraud — the most significant punishment any foreign court has imposed on an official of Bashar al-Assad's ousted Syrian regime. Al-Sheikh had commanded Adra prison on the outskirts of Damascus from 2005 to 2008, overseeing a subterranean section called Wing 13 where political prisoners were systematically tortured while he monitored the abuse through surveillance cameras.
The methods described during nine days of testimony were methodical in their cruelty. Prisoners were folded into car tires and beaten. Others were handcuffed to ceiling pipes and struck with cables for hours. A device inmates called the 'magic carpet' — two hinged wooden panels — was used to crush prisoners' bodies. One survivor testified that al-Sheikh himself stomped on the device while he was strapped inside. Another man was subjected to the same torture as punishment for writing a letter in support of a political prisoner, then forced into a red jumpsuit reserved for those marked for execution.
The wounds have not healed with time. 'I still hear the screams of others begging for mercy,' one survivor told the court. Another described living 'in the prison of my memory,' suffering panic attacks and constant anxiety. A third man, imprisoned at Adra for four years, described back injuries so severe he cannot carry his own son — a physical echo of violence inflicted two decades ago.
Al-Sheikh had entered the United States in 2020, obtained a green card, and applied for citizenship before federal agents arrested him at LAX in July 2024. He became the first Assad regime official to stand trial in person on American soil and the highest-ranking such figure prosecuted anywhere in the world while physically present. He is only the fifth person ever charged under the extraterritorial Torture Act, which allows the US to prosecute torture committed abroad by individuals found on American soil.
Prosecutors sought at least 80 years; defense attorneys argued for five, citing his age and health. The judge, describing the conduct as 'heinous, unimaginably cruel and almost unspeakably violent,' settled on 60. Assad himself was ousted in December 2024 and has since been sentenced to death in absentia by Syria's new government, though he remains in Moscow. For the survivors who testified in Los Angeles, the sentence offers something Syrian courts cannot yet deliver: a judgment rendered in person, in a foreign land, against a man who once watched their suffering through a lens.
A Los Angeles federal courtroom fell silent on Thursday as a judge handed down a 60-year sentence to Samir Ousman al-Sheikh, a 74-year-old former Syrian prison administrator who spent three years running one of Damascus's most brutal detention facilities. The conviction marks the most consequential punishment a foreign court has yet imposed on any official from Bashar al-Assad's ousted regime—and the first time such a senior figure has stood trial in person on American soil.
Al-Sheikh commanded Adra prison, located on Damascus's outskirts, from 2005 to 2008. During those years, he oversaw a subterranean section known as "Wing 13," where the regime's security apparatus interrogated and tortured political prisoners and opponents while al-Sheikh monitored the abuse through closed-circuit cameras. A federal jury convicted him in March on torture charges and for submitting false statements on his US immigration paperwork. Judge Hernan D Vera, delivering the sentence, described the conduct as "heinous, unimaginably cruel and almost unspeakably violent and brutal."
The path to this courtroom began in 2020, when al-Sheikh entered the United States and obtained a green card. He applied for citizenship, but in July 2024, federal agents arrested him at Los Angeles International Airport on immigration fraud charges. Prosecutors later added four counts related to torture. He became the first Assad regime official to face trial in an American court and the highest-ranking official from the regime to be prosecuted anywhere in the world while physically present.
During nine days of testimony, victims and witnesses described the mechanics of systematic cruelty. Guards folded prisoners into car tires and beat them. Others were handcuffed by the wrists to ceiling pipes, struck with cables, and left suspended for hours. One torture device, which detainees called the "magic carpet" or "flying carpet," consisted of two large wooden panels hinged in the middle. Guards would strap a prisoner across the hinge and force the panels together, crushing the body between them. One survivor testified that al-Sheikh himself stomped on the device while he was strapped inside. Another man recalled being subjected to the same torture as punishment for writing a letter supporting a political prisoner, then forced to wear a red jumpsuit designated for those marked for execution—a psychological torment designed to make him believe he would be killed.
Two decades later, the trauma persists. Nidal Shikhani told the court: "I still hear the screams of others begging for mercy." Sultan Abdul Malek said: "Even though 20 years have passed, I still live in the prison of my memory. I suffer from sudden panic attacks and constant anxiety." Khaled Abdul Malek, who was taken to Wing 13 twice during his four years at Adra, described chronic back pain and mobility problems so severe that he cannot carry his own son on his shoulders—a physical reminder of the violence inflicted decades ago.
Prosecutors had sought a minimum of 80 years. Al-Sheikh's attorneys argued for five years, citing his age and poor health, and noted that he had expressed willingness to be deported to Syria. More than 50 people submitted letters of support, describing him as a man of "integrity, compassion, and generosity" to his family and community. The judge settled on 60 years, a sentence that reflects both the gravity of the crimes and the defendant's advanced age.
The conviction carries symbolic weight beyond the courtroom. Al-Assad himself was ousted in December 2024 after a rebel offensive toppled his regime in just 11 days. Syria's new government has since conducted in absentia trials of former regime officials; in August, a court sentenced al-Assad and his brother Maher to death for crimes against humanity and war crimes, though both men remain in Moscow. Al-Sheikh is only the fifth person ever prosecuted under the extraterritorial Torture Act, a federal statute that permits the United States to prosecute torture committed abroad by individuals present on American soil. The sentence sends a message that even those who believed they had escaped accountability—who had obtained green cards and begun new lives in America—remain subject to the rule of law. For the victims who testified, it offers something the Syrian courts cannot yet provide: a foreign judgment, rendered in person, against a man who watched their suffering through a camera lens.
Citations marquantes
The conduct was heinous, unimaginably cruel and almost unspeakably violent and brutal.— Judge Hernan D Vera, US District Court
Human rights violators who come to the United States will receive no safe harbor here. We will find them, and they will be prosecuted and punished for their heinous crimes.— Assistant Attorney General A Tysen Duva, Justice Department Criminal Division
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur The Guardian ↗
Politics & Governance