For two consecutive days, the United States and Iran have set down their weapons — not in peace, but in the fragile grammar of diplomacy. After two weeks of nightly strikes and retaliations across the Gulf, Omani mediators and regional envoys have carved out a narrow space for negotiation, even as the Strait of Hormuz remains a contested artery and deep historical mistrust shadows every overture. The pause is real, but so is the machinery of war that surrounds it — and history reminds us that silence between adversaries is not the same as understanding.
US and Iran pause strikes as diplomatic efforts resume
Iran's diplomatic efforts had been betrayed before.
Mark
Why did both sides agree to pause at exactly the same moment? That seems unlikely without some kind of signal.
Mimi
The Omani delegation arriving in Tehran was the signal. That's how these things work—a third party shows up, both sides understand that someone is serious about talking, and they step back from the brink. But it's fragile. It only works if both sides believe the other side is actually interested.
Mark
And are they? Interested, I mean?
Mimi
That's the question nobody can answer yet. The Americans say they're open to talks. Iran says it's heard that before and gotten burned. Trump is posting AI images of himself planting flags on Iranian oil tankers. Netanyahu is warning that any Iranian move will bring a "very, very forceful response." So yes, there's diplomatic activity. But the military machinery is still running.
Mark
What about the Strait of Hormuz? That seems like the real issue underneath everything.
Mimi
It is. That's where the actual conflict is happening—vessels being stopped, warning shots fired, a tanker hitting a mine. The strait is how Iran and the US are fighting without officially fighting. And they can't agree on who controls it. Iran says it does, under a deal from June. The US says no and is building an alternative route. That disagreement could blow up the whole pause.
Mark
How long can this pause last?
Mimi
As long as both sides believe talking is better than fighting. But there's no trust. Iran remembers being attacked during previous negotiations. The US is worried about running out of missiles. Netanyahu is making threats. The pause is real, but it's held together by very thin wire.
Mark
What does Trump actually want?
Mimi
That's unclear. He's saying he wants to talk, but he's also posting images of himself planting American flags on Iranian ships. He's pausing the bombing partly because the Pentagon is running low on ammunition. He faces domestic pressure—most Americans don't support the war. But he also has Netanyahu in his ear, and his own administration is keeping the military option very much alive. The pause might be genuine, or it might just be a moment to resupply.
El Pulso
- Two weeks of nightly bombing and missile exchanges have suddenly gone quiet, but the stillness feels less like peace and more like a held breath before the next move.
- Omani diplomats arrived in Tehran as American bombers stood down — not from strength, but partly because the Pentagon's stockpile of air defense munitions in the region was running dangerously low.
- Iran's Foreign Ministry warns that its diplomatic goodwill has been 'betrayed' before, and that any resumption of US strikes will trigger a widening of the conflict beyond its current boundaries.
- On the water, the war has not paused — US naval forces are redirecting, disabling, and boarding commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, while Iranian Revolutionary Guard ships fire warning shots and a mine-struck tanker burns.
- With only 29% of Americans approving of Trump's Iran policy, domestic pressure is mounting for an exit, even as the president posts AI-generated images of bombers over Iran and Netanyahu warns of a 'very forceful response' to any renewed attacks.
For two consecutive days, the United States and Iran have set down their weapons — not in peace, but in the fragile grammar of diplomacy. After two weeks of nightly strikes and retaliations across the Gulf, Omani mediators and regional envoys have carved out a narrow space for negotiation, even as the Strait of Hormuz remains a contested artery and deep historical mistrust shadows every overture. The pause is real, but so is the machinery of war that surrounds it — and history reminds us that silence between adversaries is not the same as understanding.
For the second consecutive day, neither the United States nor Iran launched military strikes — a pause that arrived like a held breath after two weeks of relentless nightly attacks. US bombers had been hitting Iranian targets; Iranian missiles and drones had been retaliating against American allies across the Gulf. Now, suddenly, the guns had gone quiet, and diplomats were moving into the space that violence had left behind.
The silence was not accidental. An Omani delegation had arrived in Tehran, and the timing of Washington's decision to halt bombing runs was no coincidence. US Ambassador Mike Waltz said President Trump was willing to give diplomacy 'a little bit of room,' even as the administration maintained its posture of readiness. Qatar and Pakistan were also shuttling messages between the two capitals. But Iran's Foreign Ministry warned that Tehran had been 'betrayed' at the negotiating table before — attacked during previous periods of diplomacy — and saw little reason to assume this pause was different.
The Americans had their own reasons to step back. Reports indicated Trump had halted plans to escalate partly because the Pentagon's stockpile of missile interceptors and air defense munitions in the region was running dangerously low. The political cost was mounting too: only 29 percent of Americans approved of Trump's handling of the conflict, and just 28 percent believed the war was worth fighting. Iran's army spokesman confirmed his country had also halted retaliatory operations, though he warned that any resumption of US strikes would widen the conflict.
The mixed signals were everywhere. Trump posted AI-generated images of American fighters bombing Iran alongside one depicting him planting a US flag on an Iranian oil tanker. Netanyahu, preparing to meet Trump in Washington, warned that any renewed Iranian attacks would trigger a 'very, very forceful response.' The diplomatic window had limits.
Beneath the pause lay the deeper contest over the Strait of Hormuz, through which much of the world's oil and gas flows. The US Navy reported its blockade 'remains in full effect,' having redirected 12 commercial vessels, disabled two that refused to comply, and boarded two others. Iranian Revolutionary Guard forces fired warning shots to stop six vessels from transiting the strait. An oil tanker struck a mine and exploded after straying from the Iranian-approved route. Iranian officials called talks on managing strait traffic 'useful' and said progress was being made — but the incidents continued, and with them, the ever-present risk that the fragile pause could shatter at any moment.
For the second day running, neither the United States nor Iran had launched military strikes. The pause arrived like a held breath after two weeks of relentless nightly attacks—US bombers hitting Iranian targets, Iranian missiles and drones retaliating against American allies scattered across the Gulf. Now, suddenly, the guns had gone quiet, and diplomats were moving in the space that violence had left behind.
The silence was not accidental. An Omani delegation had arrived in Tehran, according to reporting from CBS, and the timing of the American decision to halt bombing runs was no coincidence. At the United Nations, US Ambassador Mike Waltz told Fox News that President Trump was willing to give diplomacy "a little bit of room," even as the administration maintained its posture of readiness. Negotiators had been working at every level for weeks, Waltz said, with intensity building over the past few days. The language was careful—Trump had said the US remained "locked and loaded"—but the message was clear: there was space for talks if both sides wanted them.
Yet trust was the problem, and it ran deep. Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei acknowledged that Qatar and Pakistan were shuttling messages between Tehran and Washington, but he also issued a warning rooted in history. Iran's diplomatic efforts had been "betrayed" before. Since late February, when the US and Israel launched their war on Iran, Tehran had learned to be skeptical of negotiating tables. The country had been attacked during previous periods of diplomacy. Why should this pause be different?
The Americans had their own calculation. According to the New York Times, Trump had halted plans to escalate the bombing campaign partly out of concern that the Pentagon's stockpile of missile interceptors and air defense munitions in the Middle East was running dangerously low. The war was expensive, in hardware and in political capital. At home, polling from Ipsos and the Washington Post showed that only 29 percent of Americans approved of how Trump was handling the conflict with Iran, and just 28 percent believed the war was worth fighting. The pressure to find an exit was mounting.
Iran, for its part, had also stepped back. Mohammad Akraminia, spokesman for Iran's army, said the country had halted its retaliatory operations. "Our strategy has essentially been retaliatory," he explained. But he added a threat: if the US resumed attacks, the conflict would widen. The rhetoric remained sharp even as the missiles stayed in their silos. Trump, meanwhile, posted AI-generated images on social media—one showing American fighters bombing Iran with the caption "Guardian Angels of the World," another depicting him planting a US flag on an Iranian oil tanker. The messaging was mixed: we are pausing, but we are not backing down.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, preparing for a Tuesday meeting with Trump in Washington, reinforced the hard line. Any resumption of Iranian attacks on Israel or its regional partners would be a "terrible mistake," he said on Fox News, and would trigger a "very, very forceful response." The diplomatic window, in other words, had limits.
Beneath the pause lay a deeper dispute over the Strait of Hormuz, the waterway through which much of the world's oil and natural gas flows. Control of the strait had become the flashpoint of the entire conflict. Iran claimed authority under a memorandum of understanding signed with Washington in June, which set a 60-day window to negotiate final terms. The US rejected this claim and had begun establishing an alternative shipping route. On the water, the tension remained acute. The US Navy's Central Command reported that its blockade of Iran "remains in full effect." Over the previous day, American forces had redirected 12 commercial vessels, disabled two that refused to comply, and boarded two others to ensure "total compliance." Iranian Revolutionary Guard forces, meanwhile, had fired warning shots to stop six vessels from transiting the strait. An oil tanker had struck a mine after straying from the Iranian-approved route, the Tasnim news agency reported, and exploded.
Baghaei said that talks about managing traffic through the strait were "useful" and that "progress was made." Technical and political consultations were ongoing. But the incidents continued, and with them, the risk that the pause would shatter. The diplomatic effort was real, but so was the machinery of confrontation, still in place, still capable of reigniting the war at any moment.
Citas Notables
Our strategy has essentially been retaliatory. We have also halted our retaliatory operations.— Mohammad Akraminia, Iranian army spokesman
Iran's past efforts at diplomacy have been betrayed.— Esmaeil Baghaei, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson
Quieres la nota completa?
Lee el original en Al Jazeera ↗
War & Conflict