In the vast, ungoverned stretches of the Sahel, a question older than any single conflict resurfaces: can violence cure the wounds that violence helped create? The United States is weighing airstrikes against JNIM, the al-Qaeda-linked group that has become West Africa's deadliest jihadist force, responsible for over 1,200 deaths in 2025 alone. Mali's military government, already drawn into Russia's orbit after successive coups, receives the proposal with cautious ambiguity, asserting sovereignty while leaving the door ajar. Analysts remind us that where states fail their people, armed groups f
US Airstrikes Alone Won't Solve Mali's Jihadist Crisis, Experts Warn
Related Coverage
Mahan Air suspends flights to Turkey and Oman following new US sanctions on Iranian airlines, intensifying economic pres…
Al Jazeera · Sep 18 South Korea backs US-North Korea talks, firmly rejects Hormuz deploymentSouth Korean President Lee Jae Myung says Trump wants dialogue with North Korea and confirms Seoul will not deploy troop…
Al Jazeera · Sep 18 Russian strike ignites major fire at Zaporizhzhia shopping centreA Russian military strike hit a shopping centre in Zaporizhzhia, southeastern Ukraine, triggering a major fire as peace …
Reuters · Sep 18 Trump faces skeptical world leaders at UN amid ongoing Iran conflictTrump is set to address world leaders at the UN while an Iran war continues, facing skepticism from international counte…
Bias & Framing
Article presents balanced expert analysis warning that US military strikes alone cannot resolve Mali's jihadist crisis without addressing root causes like poverty and governance failures.
Problem-solution framing with expert skepticism: establishes military action as insufficient, emphasizing need for comprehensive approaches addressing structural issues rather than kinetic solutions.
Geopolitical Impact
US considers airstrikes against JNIM in Mali, but experts warn military action alone cannot resolve the jihadist crisis without addressing root causes like poverty and governance failures.
France's military withdrawal created a vacuum filled by Russian security engagement, now challenged by potential US intervention. JNIM's expansion threatens regional stability and Western counterterrorism interests. Mali's weak state capacity allows non-state actors to exercise de facto governance, complicating great power competition in the Sahel.
Similar to post-2011 Libya, foreign military intervention without state-building risks creating ungoverned spaces where jihadist groups thrive. French experience in Mali (2013-2022) demonstrates military operations alone cannot defeat ideologically-motivated insurgencies.
Economic Lens
US military intervention in Mali faces skepticism from experts who warn airstrikes alone cannot address jihadist insurgency without tackling underlying poverty and governance failures.
Mali and West African consumers face continued economic disruption from regional instability, reduced business activity, higher prices for goods due to insecurity, and limited access to services in conflict-affected areas. Potential refugee flows could strain neighboring economies.
Likely increased US military spending and foreign aid allocation to Sahel region; potential multilateral coordination on counterterrorism; pressure on Mali's government to implement governance reforms and anti-corruption measures; possible sanctions or diplomatic pressure on Russia regarding its security role; development agencies may increase poverty-reduction and state-building initiatives.