Urinary bacterium discovered to produce testosterone in lab conditions

Chemistry depends on choreography at this scale.
A researcher explains why two similar enzymes behave completely differently when processing steroid molecules.
Mark

So a bacterium in urine can make testosterone. Does that mean it's making prostate cancer worse?

Mimi

Not necessarily. The study shows the bacterium has the ability to produce testosterone in a lab. But we don't know yet if it's actually doing that inside the body, or if any testosterone it makes reaches the prostate, or if it matters.

Luke

Right—and that's the crucial gap. They've shown molecular capability, not physiological relevance. Those are very different things.

Mark

Why does it matter that they found these two enzymes, DirA and DirB, if they do different things?

Mimi

Because understanding why they're different tells us how the chemistry actually works. One enzyme is flexible, one is rigid. That difference explains why one can do multiple reactions and the other can't.

Luke

But again, that's all in vitro. We're watching molecules in a test tube, not in a living person where there's pH, temperature, competing reactions, immune responses—a lot of noise.

Mark

So what's the next step?

Mimi

They need to figure out if this pathway is active in actual human bodies. Is the bacterium producing testosterone? How much? Does it accumulate near the prostate?

Luke

And they need to ask whether it correlates with anything clinically meaningful—disease progression, treatment response, hormone levels. Right now it's an interesting biochemical fact with no proven connection to health or disease.

Mark

Could this change how doctors treat prostate cancer?

Mimi

Not yet. But if they find that microbial testosterone production is significant in the body, it could open new treatment angles—targeting the bacteria, blocking the enzymes, things like that.

Luke

That's speculative. For now, this is a discovery that raises questions. It doesn't answer them.

  • A hormone thought to originate only in human tissue may have an unrecognized microbial source living within the urinary tract itself.
  • The finding unsettles existing models of prostate cancer treatment, which assume that controlling testosterone means controlling its human-origin pathways alone.
  • Researchers developed a novel high-throughput screening method — the HSDH assay — specifically to detect steroid-transforming bacteria, opening a new investigative frontier.
  • Molecular simulations revealed that the two responsible enzymes behave like different instruments playing the same score — one flexible and versatile, the other constrained by its own architecture.
  • The critical question now pressing researchers is whether this laboratory finding translates into living human biology, and whether bacterial testosterone production is measurable, meaningful, or medically consequential.

For generations, the human body's hormonal landscape was mapped without accounting for its microbial inhabitants. Now, researchers have identified a bacterium residing in the urinary tract — Actinobaculum massiliense — that carries the molecular machinery to convert a naturally occurring steroid into testosterone, a hormone long understood as central to prostate biology. The discovery, published in Nature Communications and built on contributions from multiple American universities, does not rewrite what we know about prostate cancer, but it quietly expands the territory of what we must ask: whether the microorganisms living alongside us are silent witnesses to our chemistry, or quiet participants in it.

For decades, urine was treated as a sterile waste product of little biological interest. That assumption has quietly collapsed. Scientists now recognize the urinary tract as host to its own microbial community — the urobiome — and a new study published in Nature Communications pushes past the question of who lives there to ask something harder: what are they doing?

The answer involves testosterone. Researchers identified Actinobaculum massiliense, a bacterium isolated from urine samples taken from men before prostate biopsy, that can convert DHEA — a steroid the human body naturally produces — into testosterone under laboratory conditions. The discovery emerged from a screening tool the team developed called the HSDH assay, built to detect organisms capable of transforming steroids. Because prostate cancer depends heavily on androgens like testosterone to grow, and because current treatments work by suppressing or blocking those hormones, a previously unknown microbial route to testosterone raises urgent new questions about the chemical environment surrounding the prostate.

The research team — drawing from Auburn University, the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Virginia Commonwealth University, and Carle Foundation Hospital — identified two genes responsible for this conversion, naming them dirA and dirB. Though structurally similar, the two enzymes behaved very differently in the lab. DirA proved versatile, capable of processing steroids through multiple routes toward testosterone. DirB was far more limited. The reason, it turned out, was architectural.

To understand why, researchers at Auburn's Department of Physics built three-dimensional molecular simulations — atom-by-atom animations showing the enzymes flexing and the steroid molecules rotating within them. DirA's broad internal pocket gives steroids room to reposition, allowing different parts of the molecule to engage the enzyme's catalytic machinery at different stages. DirB's narrower tunnel traps the steroid in place, frequently leaving the reactive portion misaligned — facing the wrong direction at the wrong moment. As lead physicist Rafael Bernardi observed, at this scale, chemistry is choreography.

The study stops well short of claiming that this bacterium causes prostate cancer or that its testosterone reaches tumors. What it establishes is that a urinary microorganism possesses the machinery to produce a hormone central to prostate biology — and that this machinery can now be searched for across existing microbiome datasets. If dirA and dirB prove common, and if their presence correlates with urinary hormone levels or prostate conditions, the implications could extend beyond cancer research into diagnostics, drug testing, and the broader interpretation of what urinary steroid profiles actually reflect.

For decades, scientists treated urine as a sterile fluid—a waste product with little biological interest. That assumption has shifted. Researchers now recognize the urinary tract as home to its own ecosystem of microorganisms, a community they call the urobiome. But knowing which bacteria live there is only half the question. A new study published in Nature Communications asks something harder: What are these organisms actually doing?

The answer, it turns out, involves testosterone. Scientists identified a bacterium called Actinobaculum massiliense, isolated from urine samples collected from men before prostate biopsy, that can convert DHEA—a steroid naturally produced by the human body—into testosterone under laboratory conditions. The finding emerged from a screening method the researchers developed called the Human Sterolbiome Discovery High-throughput assay, or HSDH assay, designed to identify organisms capable of transforming steroids. The discovery matters because prostate cancer depends heavily on androgen hormones, including testosterone, to grow. Current treatments for advanced disease work by reducing testosterone production or blocking its effects. A previously unknown microbial route to this hormone raises a new set of questions about whether the microorganisms living near the prostate could help shape its chemical environment.

The research team, which included experts from Auburn University, the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Virginia Commonwealth University, and Carle Foundation Hospital, identified two genes in the bacterium responsible for this testosterone production. They named them dirA and dirB, short for DHEA isomerase reductase. Laboratory experiments revealed something unexpected: the two enzymes, though structurally similar and containing many of the same chemical components, behaved very differently. DirA acted like a multipurpose steroid-processing machine, performing several different transformations and allowing the bacterium to reach testosterone through more than one route. DirB could perform only a narrow slice of that chemistry. The puzzle was why.

Solving it required moving beyond genes and into the actual motion of molecules. Researchers at Auburn University's Department of Physics, led by Rafael Bernardi, generated three-dimensional models of both enzymes and used molecular simulations to watch what happened when steroid molecules entered each one. Rather than treating the proteins as static structures, they created atom-by-atom movies showing the enzymes flexing, the steroids rotating, and surrounding molecules shifting over time. The simulations revealed the answer: DirA has a broad, open pocket that gives the steroid room to move and reposition itself, allowing different parts of the molecule to approach the enzyme's catalytic machinery during different stages of the pathway from DHEA to testosterone. DirB, by contrast, has a much narrower internal tunnel. The steroid can enter and remain inside, but the restricted space frequently leaves it misaligned, with the portion that needs to react facing away from the catalytic machinery. As Bernardi put it, at this molecular scale, chemistry depends on choreography—the steroid has to be in the right place, facing the right way, at the right moment.

The study does not claim that this bacterium causes prostate cancer, nor does it show that testosterone produced by bacteria reaches tumors or changes the course of disease. What it does establish is that a microorganism living in the urinary tract possesses the molecular machinery to produce a hormone central to prostate biology. That is worth understanding. The next phase of research will determine whether this bacterial pathway is actually active inside the human body, how much androgen the bacteria could produce there, whether those molecules reach nearby tissue, and whether they have any measurable effect on prostate health or cancer progression. Researchers can now search urinary microbiome datasets for dirA and dirB, determine how common they are, and examine whether their presence is associated with differences in urinary hormones, prostate conditions, or responses to treatment. The discovery may also have implications beyond prostate research—if microorganisms can transform steroids within the urinary tract, microbial metabolism may become another factor scientists need to consider when interpreting urinary steroid profiles in medical research, diagnostics, and drug testing.

We are not saying that these bacteria cause cancer. What we now know is that they possess the molecular machinery to produce testosterone.
— Rafael Bernardi, associate professor, Auburn University Department of Physics
The next step is to move from molecular capability to physiological relevance. We now understand how the bacterial enzymes can perform the chemistry. The larger question is whether that chemistry has a meaningful effect in the complex environment of the human body.
— Rafael Bernardi
Fale Conosco FAQ