Somewhere beneath the hills of Isfahan lies a question the world cannot yet answer: whether a stockpile of enriched uranium still sits in the tunnels there, sealed away after the strikes of June 2025. The International Atomic Energy Agency, the watchdog charged with keeping such material accounted for, has been denied entry since February, when Tehran cited the attacks on its soil and the ongoing threats as rendering normal oversight legally untenable. Caught between an unseen facility and a war that its own leaders now call unfinished, the agency is left to read satellite images of moving veh
U.N. Nuclear Watchdog Presses Iran for Access to Buried Uranium Site at Isfahan
The agency says it cannot account for the material.
Mark
Why does a report about one underground plant matter so much?
Mimi
Because the IAEA says it doesn't know the plant's exact location, its status, or whether it holds nuclear material. That's a gap in basic accounting, and it sits beside a stockpile of roughly 900 pounds of highly enriched uranium believed buried at Isfahan.
Luke
Careful with that last part. The agency says it "believes" the material is there, and the 900-pound figure is an estimate. Nobody has verified it on the ground.
Mark
What is Iran's argument for refusing access?
Mimi
That attacks and ongoing threats make normal safeguards legally untenable and materially impracticable. It has held that line since February.
Mark
And the satellite images?
Mimi
They show regular vehicle activity at the tunnel entrance. The IAEA cited that when it pressed for access.
Luke
But activity isn't a purpose. The reporting doesn't say what the vehicles are doing, and the agency doesn't claim to know.
Mark
How does this square with Washington's message?
Mimi
Unevenly. Hegseth says more than 80 percent of the nuclear industrial base is gone, while Trump says no deal is needed. Yet the main justification for the war is the program.
Luke
Also note the source. This is Reuters quoting a leaked quarterly report, relayed through CBS. The 80 percent claim is Hegseth's own assessment, not an independent finding.
Mark
So what's actually settled?
Luke
That Iran has refused access and the IAEA is worried. Where the uranium is and what state it's in remains unknown.
The Pulse
- The IAEA cannot confirm the location, condition, or contents of the Isfahan enrichment plant, and that blind spot is growing more worrying by the report.
- Satellite imagery shows regular vehicle activity at the tunnel entrance, raising fears that buried highly enriched uranium may be moving or being disturbed.
- Tehran has refused inspectors since February, arguing that attacks on its territory have made normal safeguards impossible to carry out.
- Diplomacy is stalling as the White House says it does not need a deal, with Trump dismissing talks and leaning on economic pressure instead.
- Mines and a US naval blockade keep the Strait of Hormuz volatile, with tankers burning and Brent crude far above its prewar level.
Somewhere beneath the hills of Isfahan lies a question the world cannot yet answer: whether a stockpile of enriched uranium still sits in the tunnels there, sealed away after the strikes of June 2025. The International Atomic Energy Agency, the watchdog charged with keeping such material accounted for, has been denied entry since February, when Tehran cited the attacks on its soil and the ongoing threats as rendering normal oversight legally untenable. Caught between an unseen facility and a war that its own leaders now call unfinished, the agency is left to read satellite images of moving vehicles and to say, in measured language, that it is increasingly concerned. It is a reminder that in conflicts of this kind, what cannot be seen can be as consequential as what has been destroyed.
The International Atomic Energy Agency does not know where Iran's Isfahan Fuel Enrichment Plant is, what condition it is in, or whether nuclear material is still inside. Iran has acknowledged that the underground facility exists, but it has refused to let inspectors near it. The agency first asked for access in February, as the war with the United States and Israel began, and Tehran said no, citing acts of aggression that had made normal safeguards legally untenable.
The agency's concern has been building since a September report. Satellite images show regular vehicle activity around the tunnel entrance at Isfahan, where the IAEA believes some of Iran's roughly 900-pound stockpile of highly enriched uranium may have been buried during the June 2025 strikes. Iran continues to point to the attacks on its territory as its reason for refusing.
Washington's posture has shifted repeatedly. President Trump has said, "We don't need a deal with Iran," even as he acknowledges the war is not over. Reports say U.S. officials asked Vladimir Putin to help open talks, and Treasury and State Department officials say economic pressure is doing the work. Iran has agreed to nothing on its stockpile, its enrichment, or renewed inspections.
At sea, the pressure is harder to ignore. Revolutionary Guards say two oil tankers caught fire after striking mines in the Strait of Hormuz, and Brent crude remains near $95 a barrel. The question now is whether anyone can reach Isfahan before the material's fate is decided by default.
The International Atomic Energy Agency says it does not know where Iran's Isfahan Fuel Enrichment Plant is, what condition it is in, or whether nuclear material is inside. According to Reuters, which saw the agency's latest quarterly report to member states, the IAEA is "increasingly concerned" about that blind spot. Iran has acknowledged the underground facility exists. It has refused to let inspectors visit.
The agency first asked for access in February, as the war with the United States and Israel began. Tehran said no. Its reply, as the agency relayed it, was that conditions resulting from acts of aggression and continuing threats had made normal implementation of safeguards "legally untenable" and "materially impracticable." The refusal followed U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Isfahan among them.
The IAEA had already flagged concerns in a September report. Satellite imagery showed regular vehicle activity around the entrance to the tunnel complex at Isfahan, where the agency believes some of Iran's roughly 900-pound stockpile of highly enriched uranium was buried by the June 2025 missile strikes. Citing that activity, the agency asked Iran to allow inspectors in as soon as possible. Iran has continued to refuse, pointing to the attacks on its territory.
The nuclear program is the main justification the Trump administration has given for the war, but its messaging has shifted. At times it suggested Iran would give up its remaining stockpile voluntarily; at others it declared the problem largely solved. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said earlier this week that "more than 80 percent of their nuclear industrial base" was gone. Iran, for its part, has agreed to nothing on its uranium stockpiles, its enrichment program, or renewed IAEA inspections.
Diplomacy looks thin. President Trump said Thursday, "We don't need a deal with Iran," and told Vice President JD Vance to focus on domestic politics. Hours earlier he had again claimed victory but acknowledged the war was not over, calling it "just a question of when we want to end it." Iran's chief negotiator told Al Jazeera that U.S. officials asked Russian President Vladimir Putin to help facilitate talks. The White House has not responded directly. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the approach is to keep squeezing Iran economically, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio said this week that sanctions are working well enough that military operations need not restart.
The pressure continues elsewhere. Iran's Revolutionary Guards said two oil tankers, one a supertanker, caught fire after striking mines in the Strait of Hormuz on Saturday. They said the ships had switched off radar and positioning systems and used an unauthorized route. The U.S. maintains a naval blockade of Iranian ports and has said it cleared the main routes through the strait. Brent crude held near $95.89 a barrel Friday, against about $72 before the war. Even so, the International Energy Agency reported that global oil supply surpassed demand in October for the first time since the war began.
What to watch is whether Iran lets inspectors anywhere near Isfahan, and whether Washington's stance that it needs no deal leaves any channel for that to happen. Until then, the agency's own report says it cannot account for the material.
Notable Quotes
The Agency does not know IFEP's exact location, status for safeguards purposes or whether it contains nuclear material.— IAEA quarterly report, as quoted by Reuters
We don't need a deal with Iran.— President Trump, Thursday
Want the full story?
Read the original at CBS News ↗