UN, media groups condemn Israeli strike that killed Al Jazeera team in Gaza

Six journalists killed in Israeli strike: Al Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif (28), cameramen Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal, Moamen Aliwa, correspondent Mohammed Qreiqeh, and freelance reporter Mohammed Al-Khaldi.
Who gets to tell the story of what happens next?
Six journalists killed in Gaza raises questions about access to truth as conflict expands into new territory.
Mark

Why does it matter that these were journalists specifically, rather than just six more casualties in a war that has already killed tens of thousands?

Mimi

Because journalists are the mechanism by which the world knows what's happening. In Gaza, international reporters can barely enter. So local journalists like Sharif become the eyes and ears for everyone else. When you kill them, you're not just removing individuals—you're narrowing the aperture through which reality can be seen.

Mark

But Israel says Sharif was a Hamas operative, not a journalist. They released documents. Doesn't that complicate the story?

Mimi

It does, and that's exactly the problem. He did work for Hamas's communications office years ago. But so what? The question isn't whether he ever had contact with Hamas. It's whether he was an active combatant at the moment he was killed. Israel hasn't shown that. And press freedom groups point out that Israel has made similar accusations against many journalists in Gaza without evidence.

Mark

So this is about a pattern, not just this one case.

Mimi

Exactly. Nearly 200 journalists dead in 22 months. And a consistent pattern of Israel labeling them as militants after the fact. It creates a chilling effect—why would anyone risk their life to document what's happening if they know they might be killed and then posthumously accused of being a terrorist?

Mark

The timing is interesting too. This happened just before Netanyahu announced plans to expand the military operation into the last quarter of Gaza.

Mimi

Yes. And that expansion is already drawing international pushback—Germany suspending arms, Australia recognizing Palestine. The killing of these journalists happens in that context. It's part of a larger escalation that's fracturing even Israel's traditional alliances.

Mark

What comes next?

Mimi

That's the question everyone is asking. If the military does move into Gaza City and Al-Mawasi as planned, there will be fewer journalists there to document it. That's not accidental.

  • An Israeli strike deliberately targeted Al Jazeera's Anas al-Sharif and killed five colleagues alongside him, eliminating one of the most prominent journalistic voices reporting from inside Gaza.
  • Israel insists Sharif was an active Hamas militant commanding a terrorist cell — but press freedom groups say the evidence is unsubstantiated and the pattern of labeling journalists as combatants is a recurring tactic without legal grounding.
  • The UN, the Committee to Protect Journalists, and Al Jazeera itself condemned the strike as a violation of international humanitarian law, warning that targeting journalists under the cover of militant designations sets a dangerous precedent.
  • With nearly 200 journalists killed in 22 months and Gaza's borders sealed to foreign press, local reporters like Sharif have been the primary witnesses to the conflict — making their elimination a blow to global accountability.
  • The strike lands as Israel prepares to expand military operations into the last quarter of Gaza, prompting Germany to suspend arms shipments and Australia to recognize Palestinian statehood, deepening international fractures over the war.

In the rubble outside Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, six journalists were buried on Monday after an Israeli military strike ended their work of bearing witness to war. Among them was Anas al-Sharif, a 28-year-old Al Jazeera correspondent whose voice had carried Gaza's story to the world for nearly two years — a voice Israel claims belonged to a militant, and that press freedom organizations insist belonged to a journalist protected under international law. Their deaths arrive at a moment when nearly 200 media workers have been killed in this conflict, and when the question of who is permitted to document suffering has itself become a front line.

On Monday, mourners gathered among the ruins outside Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City to bury six journalists killed in an Israeli military strike the day before. Their bodies, wrapped in white shrouds, were carried through narrow alleys by men in blue press vests — the uniform of those who document war. The most prominent among the dead was Anas al-Sharif, a 28-year-old Al Jazeera correspondent who had become one of the network's most recognizable voices from Gaza over 22 months of conflict. Alongside him died cameramen Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal, and Moamen Aliwa, correspondent Mohammed Qreiqeh, and freelance journalist Mohammed Al-Khaldi, killed when the strike hit a press tent outside the hospital's main gate.

Israel confirmed the strike was deliberate, labeling Sharif a Hamas terrorist who used journalism as cover, and releasing documents it claimed showed his enlistment with the group in 2013, a military rank, and alleged involvement in rocket attacks. Journalists who knew him offered a more layered account: early in his career he had worked for a Hamas communications office publicizing the group's events, but in recent years he had been filing daily war correspondence. The distinction matters enormously under international law, which permits targeting only active combatants — not former affiliates who have since returned to civilian roles.

Condemnations arrived quickly. The UN human rights agency called the strike a grave breach of international humanitarian law. The Committee to Protect Journalists accused Israel of a recurring pattern — designating media workers as militants without credible substantiation. Al Jazeera said the attack was an attempt to silence journalists exposing the occupation, and noted that Sharif himself had written a message to be published in the event of his death, urging the world not to forget Gaza.

His killing is part of a staggering toll. Reporters Without Borders has documented nearly 200 journalist deaths in the Gaza war since October 2023. With foreign press largely barred from entering Gaza except on tightly controlled military-escorted visits, local reporters have carried the burden of bearing witness — making their deaths not only personal tragedies but ruptures in the world's ability to see what is happening.

The strike came days after Israel's security cabinet approved plans to expand military operations into the remaining quarter of Gaza not yet under its control, including areas where hundreds of thousands of displaced Palestinians have sought refuge. Prime Minister Netanyahu vowed to press forward regardless of international opposition, even as Israeli media reported significant disagreement between the government and military leadership. Germany suspended arms shipments. Australia recognized Palestinian statehood. A senior UN official warned the planned offensive would likely trigger another calamity in a territory where famine is already unfolding and where, according to Gaza's health ministry, at least 61,499 Palestinians have been killed. Against that backdrop, the deaths of six journalists — men whose purpose was to record what others endure — raise a question the coming weeks will force the world to answer: who will be left to tell the story of what happens next?

In the courtyard of Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, dozens of mourners gathered on Monday among the rubble to say goodbye to six journalists killed in an Israeli military strike the day before. The bodies, wrapped in white shrouds with faces exposed, were carried through narrow alleys by men wearing blue press vests—the uniform of those who document war for the world. Among the dead was Anas al-Sharif, a 28-year-old correspondent for Al Jazeera who had become one of the network's most recognizable voices reporting from Gaza over the past 22 months of conflict. Four of his colleagues died alongside him: cameramen Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal, and Moamen Aliwa, plus correspondent Mohammed Qreiqeh. A sixth victim, freelance journalist Mohammed Al-Khaldi, was also killed when the strike hit a tent set up for press workers outside the hospital's main gate.

The strike itself became immediately contested ground. Israel confirmed it had deliberately targeted Sharif, labeling him a terrorist affiliated with Hamas and claiming he posed as a journalist to cover his militant activities. The Israeli military released documents it said showed Sharif's enlistment with Hamas in 2013, along with an injury report from 2017 and details of his military rank and unit. The military statement accused him of heading a Hamas "terrorist cell" and being responsible for advancing rocket attacks against Israelis. Local journalists who knew Sharif told a different story: early in his career, he had worked for a Hamas communications office, where his job was to publicize events organized by the group that has governed Gaza since 2006. But that was years ago. In recent years, he worked as a correspondent, filing daily reports on the war.

The condemnations came swiftly. The United Nations human rights agency called the strike a grave breach of international humanitarian law. The Committee to Protect Journalists accused Israel of a pattern—labeling media workers as militants without providing credible evidence to back the claims. Jodie Ginsberg, the organization's chief executive, was direct: unless Israel could demonstrate that Sharif was still an active combatant at the time of his death, there was no legal justification for killing him. International law, she noted, permits targeting only active combatants in wartime. Al Jazeera described the attack as a desperate attempt to silence journalists exposing the occupation, and pointed to what it called repeated incitement and calls from Israeli officials to target Sharif and his team. In April, Sharif had written a message to be published if he died, saying he had been silenced and urging the world not to forget Gaza.

The killing of these six journalists is part of a larger toll. Reporters Without Borders documented that nearly 200 journalists have died in the Gaza war since Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel killed 1,219 people. Israel has largely sealed Gaza's borders to international press, allowing foreign reporters in only on occasional, tightly controlled military-escorted visits. This means much of what the world knows about the conflict comes from local journalists like Sharif, who work under constant threat.

The strike occurred just days after Israel's security cabinet approved plans to expand military operations into the remaining quarter of Gaza not yet under Israeli control—territory that includes much of Gaza City and Al-Mawasi, an area Israel has designated as a safe zone where hundreds of thousands of Palestinians have sought refuge. Prime Minister Netanyahu announced the plan on Sunday, saying the military would conquer the remaining territory "with or without the support of others," even as Israeli media reported deep disagreement between the government and military leadership over the decision. The announcement triggered international backlash. Germany, a major weapons supplier and longtime Israeli ally, suspended shipments of arms that could be used in Gaza. Australia joined other Western nations in recognizing Palestinian statehood. UN Assistant Secretary-General Miroslav Jenca warned that the planned offensive "will likely trigger another calamity in Gaza."

The humanitarian stakes are already severe. UN agencies warned last month that famine is unfolding across the territory as Israel restricts aid shipments. The health ministry in Gaza, which is run by Hamas but whose figures the UN considers reliable, reports that Israel's offensive has killed at least 61,499 Palestinians. Against this backdrop, the killing of six journalists—men whose job was to bear witness—carries a particular weight. It raises a question that will likely define the coming phase of the conflict: who gets to tell the story of what happens next?

Unless Israel can demonstrate that Anas al-Sharif was still an active combatant, then there is no justification for his killing.
— Jodie Ginsberg, Committee to Protect Journalists
The planned offensive will likely trigger another calamity in Gaza.
— UN Assistant Secretary-General Miroslav Jenca
Contattaci Domande frequenti