In the long and troubled history of war's relationship with accountability, a United Nations fact-finding mission has placed a grave marker: the United States, in striking a primary school in southern Iran on February 28, killed 156 civilians — 120 of them children — in what investigators have determined constitutes a war crime under international law. The mission found that American forces acted on unverified intelligence, failed to confirm the building's civilian nature, and proceeded with reckless disregard for the lives within. That the Pentagon has completed its own investigation yet with
UN finds reasonable grounds US committed war crimes in Iran school strikes
aware of a substantial risk and acting recklessly
So the UN is saying the US deliberately struck a school it knew was a school?
Not deliberately in the sense of targeting children. The mission found the US acted on intelligence about a military commander being there, but didn't verify it. They knew there was a substantial risk they'd hit a civilian building and went ahead anyway.
That's an important distinction. The report says the US was "aware of a substantial risk"—that's different from knowing for certain. And the intelligence about the commander, was that one source or multiple?
The report doesn't specify how many sources or how solid the intelligence was. Just that it wasn't adequately verified before the strike.
Why does the targeting data being outdated matter so much?
If the coordinates or building information in your system is months or years old, you might be aiming at what you think is a military site when it's actually a school. The warnings suggest commanders knew this was a problem.
But we don't know if outdated data was actually used for this specific strike, right? That's reported as a general warning, not confirmed for Minab.
Correct. The Pentagon's own investigation concluded months ago but hasn't been made public, so we don't have their version of what happened.
And the second strike, on the sports facility—did the US deny that one too?
Central Command said they didn't strike Lamerd at all that day. The UN found evidence of a tungsten-pellet weapon hitting a sports complex there, killing and wounding 22 people.
So there's a direct factual dispute. The UN says it happened; the US says it didn't. That's still unresolved.
What about the Iranian government's actions? Are they also being held accountable?
The UN found they committed crimes against humanity during the protest crackdowns—killings, torture, detention without cause. But the scale is harder to pin down because Iran controls the information.
Le Pouls
- A single Tomahawk missile collapsed the roof of a primary school in Minab, Iran, killing 120 children in one of the deadliest single strikes on civilians in recent memory.
- UN investigators found no evidence the school served any military purpose — the US had simply acted on unverified intelligence and never updated its targeting data before firing.
- The Pentagon completed its own internal investigation months ago but has refused to release the findings, while President Trump publicly denied any intentional strike on a girls' school.
- US Central Command directly contradicts UN findings on the Lamerd sports facility strike, creating an open collision between American military claims and international investigative conclusions.
- The UN mission will present its findings to the Human Rights Council in Geneva, raising the prospect of formal international censure — though enforcement against a permanent Security Council member remains an open and painful question.
- The same UN report found Iran's government committed crimes against humanity against its own people during protest crackdowns, with the true death toll likely far exceeding official figures of over 3,000 killed.
In the long and troubled history of war's relationship with accountability, a United Nations fact-finding mission has placed a grave marker: the United States, in striking a primary school in southern Iran on February 28, killed 156 civilians — 120 of them children — in what investigators have determined constitutes a war crime under international law. The mission found that American forces acted on unverified intelligence, failed to confirm the building's civilian nature, and proceeded with reckless disregard for the lives within. That the Pentagon has completed its own investigation yet withheld its findings speaks to the enduring tension between military self-governance and the universal demand for truth.
A United Nations fact-finding mission has concluded that the United States committed war crimes when a Tomahawk missile struck the Shajareh Tayyebeh primary school in Minab, southern Iran, on February 28. The roof collapsed. One hundred and fifty-six civilians died, among them 120 children. Investigators found the school was unmistakably civilian in character and bore no evidence of military use.
On the same day, a second American strike hit a sports complex in the nearby city of Lamerd, scattering tungsten pellets across a residential area and wounding 22 civilians. The UN mission determined both strikes followed the same pattern: indiscriminate targeting driven by unverified intelligence. In the case of Minab, US forces believed a senior Iranian military commander was present but failed to confirm this before firing. Investigators concluded the failure went beyond negligence — the US, they wrote, acted while knowingly aware of a substantial risk of striking a civilian structure.
The Pentagon has conducted its own internal investigation, understood to have concluded months ago, but has not made its findings public. President Trump stated in June that no one had intentionally struck a girls' school. US Central Command denied launching any strikes into Lamerd at all — a position that stands in direct contradiction to the UN's conclusions. Reports have also emerged that senior commanders were warned the targeting intelligence used during the war was dangerously out of date.
The UN mission's mandate extended to Iran's own conduct as well. Investigators found that Iranian authorities committed crimes against humanity in their crackdown on anti-government protests that began in late December — through unlawful killings, torture, enforced disappearances, and mass detention. The true death toll, investigators concluded, likely far exceeds the government's official count of 3,038 killed. The findings will be submitted to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, where the question of what accountability can mean for the powerful will once again be tested.
A United Nations fact-finding mission has concluded there are reasonable grounds to believe the United States launched military strikes on a school and sports facility in Iran in February that killed at least 178 civilians, and that these attacks constitute war crimes under international law.
On February 28, a US Tomahawk missile struck the Shajareh Tayyebeh primary school in Minab, a city in Hormozgan province in southern Iran. The impact collapsed the roof. According to the UN investigators, 156 civilians died in that single strike, including 120 children. The mission found the school was unmistakably a civilian structure—clearly identifiable as such—and discovered no evidence it had been used for military purposes. On the same day, a second strike hit a sports complex and surrounding residential area in the nearby city of Lamerd, scattering tungsten pellets across the site. That attack killed and wounded 22 civilians and damaged nearby homes and a school.
The UN fact-finding team, an independent international mission examining both US conduct during the Iran war that began in February and the Iranian government's response to nationwide protests, determined that the school strike amounted to an indiscriminate attack. According to their investigation, the US had acted on intelligence suggesting a senior Iranian military commander was present at the location but failed to adequately verify this information before firing. The investigators found that the failure to update targeting data and confirm the building's actual use went beyond simple negligence. In their formal language, the US "directed the strikes at the building of the school while being aware of a substantial risk of striking a civilian object and acting recklessly as regards the possibility that this would happen." The Lamerd strike, the mission concluded, followed the same pattern of indiscriminate targeting.
The Pentagon has conducted its own secretive investigation into the incident, understood to have concluded several months ago, but has not released findings. In June, President Donald Trump stated that "nobody" had intentionally attacked a girls' school in Iran in February, citing that investigation. US Central Command denied in March that its forces had launched any strikes into Lamerd on that date—a position that directly contradicts the UN's findings.
There have been reports that senior US commanders had been warned that the targeting intelligence used during the war, including for the Minab strike, was dangerously out of date. The UN mission will submit its findings to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva. US officials have previously maintained that military operations are conducted in accordance with the law of armed conflict.
The investigation also examined Iran's own conduct. The UN mission found that Iranian authorities had committed crimes against humanity during their crackdown on anti-government protests that began in late December. The government's response involved unlawful killings, torture, arbitrary detention, enforced disappearances, and severe restrictions on freedom of expression. While investigators could not independently verify the death toll, they concluded the actual number of dead and injured was likely far higher than official figures, which claim 3,038 people were killed and 25,000 injured. Iran has blamed "terrorists and rioters" backed by exiled opponents and the US and Israel for the unrest. Rights groups say bystanders were among those killed in what amounts to the largest crackdown since Shia Muslim clerics took power in 1979.
Citations marquantes
The US directed the strikes at the building of the school while being aware of a substantial risk of striking a civilian object and acting recklessly as regards the possibility that this would happen.— UN fact-finding mission
Nobody purposely attacked a girls' school in Iran in February.— President Donald Trump, June 2026