In the long and painful chronicle of this war, Sunday brought another moment where words and reality parted ways entirely. Donald Trump declared an 'energy ceasefire' into the void of social media, without the knowledge of Ukraine, without the consent of Russia, and without any mechanism to make it real — and by Monday morning, missiles were already answering the question of whether it would hold. At least four civilians died across Ukrainian cities as strikes continued unabated, leaving European leaders and Zelenskyy himself to reckon with the distance between a declaration and a peace.
Ukraine reports Russian strikes despite Trump's announced 'energy ceasefire'
At least 4 civilians killed and dozens injured in Russian strikes across Kyiv, Kharkiv, Donetsk, and Kramatorsk on Monday.
It was clear that Putin does not read Truth Social
Mark
So Trump announced this ceasefire on Sunday and by Monday morning it was already broken. How does that even happen?
Mimi
He announced it unilaterally on social media with no confirmation from either Moscow or Kyiv. Zelenskyy found out through news reports. There was no agreement in place—just Trump's declaration.
Luke
Right, and that's the key detail. We don't know if Trump actually negotiated this with anyone or if he simply announced something he hoped would happen. The source doesn't say he had a deal.
Mark
And Russia's response was basically to ignore it?
Mimi
Worse than ignore it. Within hours, Russian missiles hit apartment buildings and energy facilities across multiple cities. At least four civilians were killed, dozens injured. It was a direct contradiction.
Luke
Though we should note the source doesn't say Russia explicitly rejected the ceasefire before striking. They just struck anyway. The formal rejection came later—Lavrov saying Putin would only consider a one-day ceasefire for elections.
Mark
So what was Zelenskyy's position? Was he open to this or not?
Mimi
He said in principle he could support stopping attacks on energy infrastructure, but only with security guarantees and only if Russia actually honored it. He also threatened retaliation if Russia refused.
Luke
And that's conditional on the Americans enforcing it. He said "if the Americans truly step in now and make sure Russians respect it." That's a big if.
Mark
Did Europe think this would work?
Mimi
No. Kallas said they hadn't seen Russia stick to anything. Macron said he'd seen no ceasefire from the Russian side in the previous 48 hours.
Luke
Both were careful to say they'd welcome it if it held. But the evidence on the ground was already contradicting the announcement.
Il Polso
- Trump announced a mutual energy ceasefire on Sunday night with no coordination with either Kyiv or Moscow — Zelenskyy learned of it from the news, not from Washington.
- Within hours of the announcement, Russian missiles struck a Kyiv apartment building, energy facilities in Kharkiv, and residential areas in Donetsk and Kramatorsk, killing at least four civilians and wounding dozens.
- Russia flatly rejected the proposal, with Lavrov offering only a single-day ceasefire contingent on Ukraine holding a presidential election — a condition designed to be refused.
- Zelenskyy left the door open conditionally, saying an energy ceasefire could work only if the United States enforced it and Russia actually honored it — and warning of Ukrainian retaliation if it did not.
- EU foreign affairs chief Kallas and French President Macron both expressed pointed skepticism, noting that Russia had shown no sign of restraint in the 48 hours since Trump's announcement.
In the long and painful chronicle of this war, Sunday brought another moment where words and reality parted ways entirely. Donald Trump declared an 'energy ceasefire' into the void of social media, without the knowledge of Ukraine, without the consent of Russia, and without any mechanism to make it real — and by Monday morning, missiles were already answering the question of whether it would hold. At least four civilians died across Ukrainian cities as strikes continued unabated, leaving European leaders and Zelenskyy himself to reckon with the distance between a declaration and a peace.
Donald Trump announced an 'energy ceasefire' on Sunday evening via social media, declaring that both sides had agreed to halt strikes on energy infrastructure effective immediately. By Monday morning, the announcement had collapsed under the weight of its own contradictions. Zelenskyy told reporters he had learned of the ceasefire from news coverage — it was, in his words, news to him. Russia had not confirmed it either. No mechanism existed to enforce it.
The strikes came anyway. A high-rise apartment building in Kyiv was hit, killing one and injuring eleven. Kharkiv's energy facilities were struck, wounding at least twelve. In Donetsk, a rocket killed three civilians. Kramatorsk reported four more injured. The pattern — power infrastructure and residential buildings targeted simultaneously, around the clock — had become a grim signature of this phase of the war. Speaking at the Warsaw Security Forum, Zelenskyy offered a sardonic summary: 'It was clear that Putin does not read Truth Social.'
The Kremlin's formal response was dismissive. Foreign Minister Lavrov said Russia would consider a ceasefire of only one day, and only if Ukraine held a presidential election — a condition Zelenskyy could not accept. Russia had already rejected a Ukrainian proposal for a sixty-day election ceasefire. 'I do not think he deserves a respite,' Lavrov said of Zelenskyy.
Zelenskyy did not foreclose the possibility entirely. He said he could support an energy ceasefire in principle, but only with security guarantees and only if the United States stepped in to ensure Russian compliance. He was equally clear about the alternative: if Russia refused, Ukraine would respond in kind — a reference to its ongoing strikes on Russian oil refineries and export infrastructure.
Europe watched with measured skepticism. EU foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas said the bloc would welcome a ceasefire 'if it holds,' while noting Russia had given no indication it would comply. French President Macron was more direct, saying he had observed no energy ceasefire from the Russian side in the preceding 48 hours. The gap between Trump's declaration and the reality on the ground had become, by Monday, impossible to paper over.
Donald Trump announced an "energy ceasefire" on Sunday evening through his social media platform, declaring that both sides had agreed to stop attacking energy infrastructure, effective immediately. By Monday morning, the claim lay in ruins. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he learned about the ceasefire from news reports—it was, he told Axios within minutes of Trump's announcement, "news for me." Within hours, Russian missiles struck targets across Ukraine anyway.
Kyiv took a direct hit on a high-rise apartment building, killing one person and injuring eleven more, according to Mayor Vitali Klitschko. In Kharkiv, to the northeast, at least twelve people were wounded in attacks on energy facilities. Donetsk saw a rocket strike that killed three civilians. Kramatorsk reported four more injured. The pattern was familiar: Russia was hitting power plants and residential areas simultaneously, the kind of dual targeting that has become routine in this war. Zelenskyy, speaking at the Warsaw Security Forum on Monday, made a dark joke about the gap between Trump's announcement and reality. "It was clear that Putin does not read Truth Social," he said.
The deeper problem was structural. Trump had announced a ceasefire with no confirmation from Moscow, no agreement from Kyiv, and no mechanism to enforce it. The Kremlin's response was dismissive. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Putin would consider a ceasefire for only a single day—and only if Ukraine held a presidential election. Zelenskyy had previously proposed a sixty-day election ceasefire; Russia rejected that outright. "I do not think he deserves a respite," Lavrov said.
Zelenskyy did not slam the door entirely. He said in principle he could support an agreement to stop attacking energy infrastructure, but only if it came with security guarantees and only if Russia actually honored it. "This ceasefire, it can work, and it can become a major step toward ending the war if the Americans truly step in now and make sure Russians respect it," he said via video link. He also made clear what would happen if Russia refused: "If Russia does not agree to an energy ceasefire, we will respond." The condition was not abstract. Ukraine has been striking Russian oil refineries and export facilities; a genuine ceasefire would require Russia to stop hitting Ukrainian power plants in exchange. But Russia had just demonstrated it had no intention of doing so.
Europe watched with skepticism. Kaja Kallas, the European Union's foreign affairs chief, said the bloc would welcome an energy ceasefire "if it holds," but added pointedly: "We haven't yet seen that Russia will also stick to it." French President Emmanuel Macron was more blunt. He said a "real ceasefire" had to be "respected by both sides," but noted: "I have not noted, over the last 48 hours, any energy ceasefire coming from the Russian side." The strikes continued through Monday. Russian attacks on Ukrainian cities have increasingly moved beyond nighttime raids; they now disrupt life around the clock. The gap between what Trump announced and what Russia was actually doing had become impossible to ignore.
Citazioni salienti
This ceasefire, it can work, and it can become a major step toward ending the war if the Americans truly step in now and make sure Russians respect it.— Volodymyr Zelenskyy
I have not noted, over the last 48 hours, any energy ceasefire coming from the Russian side.— Emmanuel Macron
Vuoi la storia completa?
Leggi l'originale su Deutsche Welle ↗
War & Conflict