At the intersection of geopolitics and market architecture, British steelmakers find themselves paying nearly £30 more per megawatt hour than their French counterparts — the steepest such gap in three years. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz sent global gas prices surging, and because the UK's electricity market is structured so that gas sets the price for all generation, even wind and solar became more expensive overnight. France's nuclear grid and Germany's coal plants insulated those industries from the same shock, widening a competitive wound that the government's reindustrialization amb
UK steelmakers face worst electricity cost gap with EU in three years
competing with one hand tied behind their backs
So the core problem is that Britain's electricity market is structured differently than France's or Germany's?
Exactly. In France, nuclear plants set the price floor. In Germany, coal does. But in Britain, gas prices determine the wholesale rate for everything—even renewables that cost a fraction as much to produce. When global gas prices spike, everyone pays more.
But wait—if renewables are cheaper to produce, why can't the market just reflect that? Why does gas set the price?
It's how the wholesale market works. The grid needs to be balanced at every moment. The most expensive source needed to meet demand sets the price for all sources. Usually that's gas.
And Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz pushed gas prices up globally?
Yes. It's a geopolitical shock that hit Britain's energy system harder than France's because of how the two countries generate power.
How much of this is actually about the Iran situation versus structural problems that were already there?
The £30 gap is the worst in three years, but the gap itself has existed for years. Iran made it worse, but the underlying issue is the market structure.
So even if Iran reopens the strait, Britain still has a problem?
Correct. The government removed some policy costs last year, but that only went so far. The industry is saying you need either cheaper renewables or direct subsidies.
And the government's position is that they've already cut costs by £1 billion a year for the most intensive users?
That's what they're claiming. But the industry says it's still not enough to compete fairly with France.
What happens if the government doesn't act?
Steelmakers either raise prices and lose market share in Europe, or accept lower profits. Neither is a long-term strategy.
Le Pouls
- Iran's closure of the Strait of Hormuz sent global gas prices soaring, and the UK's electricity market — uniquely exposed because gas sets rates for all power sources — absorbed the full force of the shock.
- French steelmakers, shielded by nuclear generation, and German rivals, backed by coal, face no equivalent vulnerability, leaving British producers at a £30/MWh disadvantage that is quietly hollowing out their competitiveness.
- With roughly £3 billion in annual steel exports flowing to the EU, the cost gap is not an abstraction — it forces producers to choose between uncompetitive prices and unsustainable margins.
- The government removed most policy-driven industrial electricity costs last year and claims to have cut bills by up to 25 percent for over 10,000 manufacturers, but the industry says these measures fall short of what the crisis demands.
- UK Steel is pressing for a direct price subsidy capped at £51 million annually, arguing it is the only realistic bridge while renewable expansion — the structural fix — remains years away from reshaping the market.
At the intersection of geopolitics and market architecture, British steelmakers find themselves paying nearly £30 more per megawatt hour than their French counterparts — the steepest such gap in three years. The closure of the Strait of Hormuz sent global gas prices surging, and because the UK's electricity market is structured so that gas sets the price for all generation, even wind and solar became more expensive overnight. France's nuclear grid and Germany's coal plants insulated those industries from the same shock, widening a competitive wound that the government's reindustrialization ambitions cannot afford to ignore. The question now is whether short-term subsidies or long-term energy transformation can close the gap before it becomes a structural scar.
British steelmakers are paying nearly £30 more per megawatt hour than their French rivals — the widest electricity cost gap in three years — and the forces behind it stretch from the Strait of Hormuz to the architecture of the UK's own energy market.
The immediate trigger was geopolitical: when the US and Israel intensified operations against Iran, Tehran closed the Strait of Hormuz, sending global gas prices sharply higher. For the UK, the damage was amplified by a structural quirk — gas prices set the rate for all electricity generation, including renewables. France, running largely on nuclear power, and Germany, leaning on coal, faced no equivalent exposure. The result was a cost disadvantage that widened from £18 per megawatt hour last year to nearly £30 now.
The stakes are concrete. Around 75 percent of British steel exports — worth roughly £3 billion annually — go to the EU. When domestic electricity costs run significantly higher than those of French or German competitors, steelmakers cannot simply absorb the difference. Higher prices or squeezed margins are the only options, and neither is sustainable.
The government has acted at the margins. Under Keir Starmer, most policy-driven costs on industrial electricity bills were stripped away last year, and officials say manufacturing businesses have seen bills cut by up to 25 percent. But the industry argues this is insufficient. UK Steel director general Peter Brennan has called for direct price subsidies — specifically a cap costing around £51 million annually, under which the government covers costs above the threshold and the industry repays if prices fall below it.
The broader context adds irony. The gap with France had been narrowing steadily from a peak of £153 per megawatt hour in 2022, when Russia's invasion of Ukraine convulsed global energy markets. That progress suggested the worst was behind the sector. The recent reversal signals that structural vulnerabilities remain very much alive — and for a government that has staked part of its economic identity on rebuilding British manufacturing, electricity costs have become the most visible and stubborn obstacle in the path.
British steelmakers are paying almost £30 more per megawatt hour of electricity than their French competitors—the widest gap in three years. The surge stems from a collision of geography, geopolitics, and market structure that has left the UK steel industry in an increasingly precarious position just as the government has made reindustrialization a centerpiece of its economic strategy.
The immediate trigger was geopolitical. When the US and Israel intensified military operations against Iran, Iran responded by closing the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint through which roughly a third of the world's seaborne oil passes. The blockade sent global gas prices soaring. For the UK, this was particularly painful because British electricity markets are structured so that gas prices set the rate for all power generation—even wind and solar, which cost far less to produce. France, by contrast, generates most of its electricity from nuclear reactors. Germany relies heavily on coal. Neither faces the same exposure to volatile gas markets. The result: a cost disadvantage that has widened from £18 per megawatt hour last year to nearly £30 now, according to analysis by UK Steel, the industry lobby group.
This matters because steel is not a luxury good made in isolation. About 75 percent of British steel exports go to the EU, worth roughly £3 billion annually. When British steelmakers pay substantially more for electricity than their French or German counterparts, they cannot simply absorb the difference. They either raise prices—making their products less competitive in the European market—or they accept lower margins. Neither option is sustainable at scale.
The government has already taken some action. Under Prime Minister Keir Starmer, most of the policy-driven costs added to electricity bills for heavy industrial users were removed last year. The government also announced measures on Monday aimed at supporting over 100,000 job opportunities across eight key growth sectors, including advanced manufacturing. A spokesperson emphasized that the government has reduced electricity bills by up to 25 percent for more than 10,000 manufacturing businesses and cut costs for the most electricity-intensive operations by around £1 billion per year.
But the industry says it is not enough. Peter Brennan, director general of UK Steel, framed the problem bluntly: British steelmakers are being asked to compete with one hand tied behind their backs. He argued that direct subsidies are the only realistic option in the short term. UK Steel has proposed a price cap that would cost roughly £51 million annually to implement. Under the scheme, the government would pay the difference when prices exceed the cap, while the industry would reimburse the government if prices fall below it. The alternative—expanding renewable energy capacity fast enough to reshape the electricity market—is a longer-term project that does not solve the immediate crisis.
The timing is awkward for the government's reindustrialization agenda. The gap with France had actually narrowed over the previous three years, falling from a peak of £153 per megawatt hour in 2022, when Russia's invasion of Ukraine triggered a global energy crisis. That suggested the worst might be passing. The recent widening to £30 signals that structural vulnerabilities remain. The gap with Germany, by comparison, is smaller—about £12 per megawatt hour this year—but still significant. For a government betting that manufacturing can be rebuilt as a pillar of the British economy, electricity costs have become the most visible and stubborn obstacle.
Citations marquantes
British steelmakers are being asked to compete with one hand tied behind their backs. Despite welcome government action, our electricity prices remain vastly higher than those of our European and global competitors.— Peter Brennan, director general of UK Steel
We are tackling industry's number one concern head-on by reducing electricity bills by up to 25% for over 10,000 manufacturing businesses, and cutting costs for hundreds of our most electricity-intensive businesses by around £1bn per year.— UK government spokesperson