On a late October morning, the business secretary Jonathan Reynolds told the nation that British officials have opened conversations with Brussels about a relationship that might, one day, bring back free movement. It is a moment that stirs old wounds from the Brexit years, when the question of who may come and go across the Channel divided families, parties, and towns alike. The government presents this as the early groundwork for a long decision, one it insists will rest with the voters, even as the manner of their consultation remains unsettled.
UK Officials Open Talks With EU on Long-Term Ties, Including Possible Return to Free Movement
"They're the boss on this," the business secretary said of voters.
Why is this a bigger deal than the usual summit preparation?
Because free movement was long treated as off the table. Burnham has now said that staying out of it is no longer a red line, and Reynolds confirmed officials have begun discussing long-term options.
Careful with "begun negotiating." Reynolds said officials will talk about future options. That's not the same as a negotiating mandate, and the source doesn't describe what's been tabled.
So what is actually on the table in November?
A deal easing some trading restrictions, a youth mobility deal, a food and drink agreement and something on emissions trading. Those are the concrete items.
Right, and free movement isn't among them. It's a later conversation, after the prime minister sets out options.
Burnham said rejoining the single market might not need a referendum. Is that settled?
It's his belief, put in a Sunday Times interview: a manifesto commitment could suffice, while fully rejoining would need an in-out vote.
Which is one politician's view. Reynolds, asked about voters having a say, didn't say whether that means an election or a referendum. That's unresolved.
And the resistance?
Melanie Onn speaks for Labour MPs in leave-voting seats who worry about reopening old wounds. Farage argues Burnham has no mandate and cites Labour's manifesto and Burnham's own words to Makerfield.
Those are two critics. The reporting doesn't tell us how many backbenchers share Onn's view, only that a number are wary.
The Pulse
- A single radio interview has set off a fresh row over free movement, reopening a wound the country had hoped was closing.
- Labour backbenchers in Brexit-leaning northern and Midlands seats are pushing back, warning that the scars of the referendum have not healed.
- Reform UK's Nigel Farage calls the talks 'very, very poor indeed,' accusing the prime minister of acting without a mandate.
- The government is steering toward a November EU summit on trade and youth mobility, with long-term options to follow.
- The public's promised say remains undefined, leaving the destination of the debate unclear and contested.
On a late October morning, the business secretary Jonathan Reynolds told the nation that British officials have opened conversations with Brussels about a relationship that might, one day, bring back free movement. It is a moment that stirs old wounds from the Brexit years, when the question of who may come and go across the Channel divided families, parties, and towns alike. The government presents this as the early groundwork for a long decision, one it insists will rest with the voters, even as the manner of their consultation remains unsettled.
On Tuesday morning, Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that British officials have begun discussions with the EU about a long-term relationship that could include a return to free movement. He stressed that the British people "are the boss" over what the UK ultimately accepts.
The immediate focus, he said, is the November EU summit, where the two sides are expected to agree on easing some trading restrictions and a youth mobility deal, with a food and drink arrangement and emissions trading also in the package. The prime minister, Andy Burnham, wants to go further, and will set out options for the long-term relationship and their trade-offs after the summit. Reynolds said no decision would be made without voters having a say, though he did not specify whether that would be a general election or a referendum.
The debate was sparked by an interview Burnham gave the Sunday Times, in which he called for an honest discussion and said ruling out free movement would no longer be a red line. He acknowledged its significant challenges, while suggesting it might be less difficult than the current pattern of migration.
The response has been sharp. Melanie Onn, the Labour MP for Great Grimsby and Cleethorpes, said the scars of the referendum have not healed and called this an unnecessary conversation right now. Nigel Farage said it would be "very, very poor indeed," recalling that Burnham had promised not to reopen these arguments and that Labour won a large majority on a pledge not to re-enter the single market or customs union. The November summit comes first, and how the public will be heard remains undecided.
On Tuesday morning, Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, went on BBC Radio 4's Today programme and said that British officials have begun discussions with the EU about a long-term relationship, one that could include a return to free movement. In the same breath he insisted that the British people "are the boss" over what the UK ends up accepting.
Reynolds was careful about where the government's attention sits right now. The immediate focus, he said, is the EU summit in November, where the two sides are expected to seal an agreement easing some trading restrictions, alongside a youth mobility deal. He said the package would include a food and drink deal and an arrangement on emissions trading, and that these would make a significant difference.
But the prime minister, Andy Burnham, wants more than that, Reynolds said. Officials will be talking to their EU counterparts about what the future options for the relationship might be. Reynolds described a series of policy changes on the European side that will affect the UK, and said the government needs to keep uncertainty to a minimum. Burnham, he said, will set out how to resolve the long-term relationship after the summit, and will be frank with the public about the trade-offs.
Reynolds said no assumptions had been made about the stage after that. He said the prime minister wants to lay out options for resolving some of the tensions that exist. He also said no decision would be taken without voters getting a say, though he did not specify whether that would come through a general election or a referendum.
The prompt for the talk of free movement was an interview Burnham gave the Sunday Times, in which he pleaded for an honest discussion on the subject and made clear that ruling it out would no longer be a red line in talks with Brussels. He also said he believed rejoining the single market and accepting free movement could be done without another referendum, provided Labour put it in its manifesto. Fully rejoining the EU, by contrast, would require another in-out poll, he said.
Burnham acknowledged the difficulties. Free movement had very significant challenges attached, he said, and he had spoken about them in his earlier time in parliament. But he suggested it was a type of immigration that was perhaps less difficult than now, and he contrasted it with what he called revolving-door migration, where people come and then go back. The balance of migration has changed since then, he said, and the country has to have an honest discussion about it.
Not everyone in his party is comfortable. Several backbenchers with heavily pro-Brexit seats in the north and the Midlands are wary of reopening the arguments over free movement or rejoining the EU. Melanie Onn, the Labour MP for Great Grimsby and Cleethorpes, told the programme she is still not over the divisive debate that followed the referendum and does not think the scars have healed for many people. She called this an unnecessary conversation to be having at this time.
The sharpest criticism came from Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, who said it would be "very, very poor indeed" to begin discussing free movement. He noted that five months ago Burnham told leave-voting Makerfield he would not reopen these arguments, and that two and a half years ago a Labour government won a large majority on a pledge not to re-enter the single market or customs union or reopen free movement. Farage said the prime minister has no mandate, and that officials negotiating in Brussels already was "really very, very poor indeed."
The November summit comes first. After it, Burnham is due to set out the long-term options and their trade-offs, and how the public gets its say remains undecided.
Notable Quotes
The British people are the people who will decide this. They're the boss on this.— Jonathan Reynolds, business secretary, BBC Radio 4 Today
This prime minister has no mandate, and to hear that his officials are negotiating in Brussels already is really very, very poor indeed.— Nigel Farage, Reform UK leader