Uganda Reports No Active Ebola Cases as Kenya and Nigeria Infections Put Entebbe Airport Under Scrutiny

A Kenyan Ebola patient died in Nairobi on October 5, and a Swiss-Ugandan woman in Abuja is isolated for treatment with 44 contacts being traced.
Untraced does not mean infected, but finding the exposed is how spread is stopped.
Kenyan officials are searching for a Ugandan contact of the first patient who died in Nairobi.
Mark

Why does a shared date at one airport matter so much?

Mimi

Because it's the only point where the two cases visibly touch. Both patients passed through Entebbe on October 3, and investigators want to know if they were there at the same time.

Luke

But nobody has established they met. Overlapping dates aren't an overlapping encounter, and there's no evidence of transmission at the airport.

Mark

What's the dispute over the Nigerian woman?

Mimi

Uganda's ministry said preliminary findings pointed to a business trip to eastern DR Congo. Switzerland says she and her husband never went there.

Luke

And the WHO and Africa CDC say they haven't received confirmation of the Congo trip either. So that claim is unverified, not disproven.

Mark

Does that mean she caught it in Uganda?

Mimi

Switzerland said it believed so, traveling with her husband in Uganda.

Luke

Which the report says hasn't been independently confirmed. Where she was exposed is still unknown.

Mark

And the missing man in Kenya?

Mimi

A Ugandan contact of the patient who died. Officials have his name and passport number but can't reach him, and he reportedly used a South Sudanese number.

Luke

That comes via the Daily Nation quoting Kenya's health director-general. Untraced isn't infected. It's a gap in the tracing, nothing more.

  • Two Ebola patients crossed the same airport on the same day, and nobody yet knows whether their paths met.
  • Switzerland contradicts Uganda's account of the Nigerian woman's travels, leaving her true exposure site unsettled.
  • A Kenyan patient has died in Nairobi, and an untraced Ugandan contact is still out of reach, phone number traced to South Sudan.
  • Nigeria is isolating its patient and tracing 44 contacts, while Uganda tightens screening at its borders.
  • Africa CDC convenes an emergency virtual meeting on October 28, and the outcome of the chase for missing contacts will decide whether containment holds.

On an early October day, two travelers later diagnosed with Ebola passed through Entebbe airport in Uganda, one bound from Congo to Kenya and the other heading home to Nigeria. In the way that such coincidences sometimes do in a world of constant movement, a shared date has turned into a question no one can yet answer: did their paths cross, and if so, did anything pass between them? Uganda insists it has no confirmed active cases, while the travel story of the Nigerian woman has become disputed, leaving health authorities to rebuild, step by careful step, the invisible routes that the virus may have taken.

On October 3, two travelers who would later test positive for Ebola passed through Entebbe International Airport in Uganda. One was a patient moving from the Democratic Republic of Congo toward Kenya; the other was a woman on her way home to Nigeria. Officials confirm the shared date, and investigators are now working to learn whether their movements overlapped at all. Health authorities say they may have crossed paths, but no one has shown that they met or that the virus passed between them in the airport.

In Nigeria, the woman developed symptoms on October 7, sought care at a private facility on October 11, and was confirmed to have Ebola and isolated. Health officials say she is stable and that 44 contacts, including health workers, caregivers and fellow travelers, have been identified. Her travel story has since become contested. Uganda's Health Ministry said she visited eastern Congo on business and passed through Uganda without symptoms, but Swiss authorities, who describe her as a Swiss national of Ugandan origin married to a diplomat in Abuja, say she and her husband never went to Congo. The WHO and Africa CDC have received no confirmed evidence of such a trip. Where she was exposed remains unresolved.

In Kenya, the first confirmed patient died in Nairobi on October 5 after travelling through Uganda, and further infections have since been linked to that case. One contact is still missing: a Ugandan man whose registered phone number reportedly points to South Sudan. Officials know his name and passport number but cannot reach him. Being untraced does not mean he is infected, yet finding such people is essential.

In Abuja, residents recall earlier outbreaks, and some describe a deeper fear that a strained health system could struggle under the weight of illness and hardship. Uganda's zero-case claim does not rule out infection, and the shared travel date does not prove an undetected outbreak. Africa CDC will meet national health officials on October 28, while the search for the missing contact and the true itinerary of the Nigerian patient goes on.

On October 3, two travelers who would later be diagnosed with Ebola passed through Entebbe International Airport in Uganda. One was a patient on a journey from the Democratic Republic of Congo to Kenya. The other was a woman heading home to Nigeria. Wessam Mankoula, who leads emergency preparedness and response at the Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, confirmed the shared date on Thursday. Investigators are now trying to establish whether their movements overlapped at all.

That question remains open. Health officials say the two may have crossed paths, but it has not been established that they met, or that any transmission happened in the airport. Uganda, for its part, maintains that it has no confirmed active Ebola cases.

In Nigeria, Health Minister Muhammad Ali Pate announced an imported case in the Federal Capital Territory, involving a woman who had recently traveled to East Africa, including Uganda. She developed symptoms on October 7 and went to a private health facility on October 11. Laboratory testing confirmed Ebola, and she was isolated for treatment. Pate said she was stable and that 44 contacts had been identified, among them health care workers, caregivers, other patients and people she may have met while traveling.

Her itinerary has become the center of a dispute. Uganda's Health Ministry said preliminary findings indicated she had gone to eastern DR Congo on business, then passed through Uganda without symptoms on her way back to Nigeria. In an October 20 statement, the ministry added that transit through Uganda does not establish infection there, and that the place of exposure is still under investigation. Switzerland's Federal Department of Foreign Affairs then contradicted that account in a statement to Reuters, saying the woman and her husband did not travel to DR Congo. Swiss authorities identified her as a Swiss national of Ugandan origin, married to a Swiss diplomat based in Abuja. A day earlier, the Swiss government had told Reuters it believed she contracted the virus while traveling with her husband in Uganda, an assessment that has not been independently confirmed. The World Health Organization and Africa CDC said they had received no confirmed information that she had been to DR Congo.

The conflicting accounts leave unresolved where she was exposed and how accurately her movements were first reconstructed. They do not show that she caught the virus in Uganda. Uganda says it is waiting for more detailed information from Nigeria.

In Kenya, the first confirmed Ebola patient died in Nairobi on October 5 after traveling from DR Congo through Uganda. Officials have established that this patient also went through Entebbe on October 3. Kenyan authorities have since reported additional infections linked to that first case. One thread is still loose: according to the Daily Nation, health officials are searching for a Ugandan man listed as a contact of the deceased. Patrick Amoth, Kenya's director-general for health, told the paper that officials know him by name, passport number and phone, but cannot reach him. The newspaper reported he was using a South Sudanese phone number. Being untraced does not mean he is infected, though finding exposed people is essential to stopping further spread.

Uganda shares a long border with DR Congo, where Ebola outbreaks have repeatedly tested health authorities, and trade, migration and air travel complicate efforts to pinpoint exposure. Symptoms typically appear two to 21 days after infection, and the WHO says infected people are not considered infectious until symptoms begin, so even good border screening cannot catch every case. Uganda says it is tightening screening at points of entry, and Nigeria has stepped up contact tracing and infection prevention.

In Abuja, the case has stirred memories of earlier outbreaks. Resident Peace Kolawole told DW she was carrying hand sanitizer and was very concerned. Another resident, Jonathan Steven, said people are no longer worried about sickness but about surviving, reflecting fears that the health system could struggle amid economic hardship.

Uganda's zero-case declaration does not prove all infections are ruled out, and the shared travel dates do not prove an undetected outbreak. Next, Africa CDC will convene an extraordinary virtual meeting of national health officials on October 28, while the search for the missing Kenyan contact and the Nigerian patient's true itinerary continues.

She and her husband did not travel to the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
— Switzerland's Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, to Reuters
We know him by name and passport number and from his phone but we are not able to reach him.
— Patrick Amoth, Kenya's director-general for health, to the Daily Nation
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei Deutsche Welle ↗
Kontakt FAQ