In the narrow waters of the Strait of Hormuz — where a fifth of the world's oil passes daily — two vessels belonging to the UAE's state energy company were struck on Thursday evening, the second such attack in as many days. The UAE has named Iran as responsible, calling the incidents piracy and a threat to the arteries of global commerce. The episode is not an isolated provocation but part of a longer contest over who holds authority over one of civilization's most consequential chokepoints, a question that remains dangerously unanswered.
UAE condemns Iran for attacking ADNOC vessels in Strait of Hormuz
Economic coercion wrapped in military action
Mark
Why does Iran keep targeting these specific oil tankers? Is there something about ADNOC vessels that makes them a particular focus?
Mimi
ADNOC is the UAE's national oil company, and the UAE is seen as aligned with the United States and Israel. Iran's Revolutionary Guard has made clear it views vessels linked to its adversaries as fair game. It's not random—it's a message.
Mark
But attacking ships in international waters seems like a dramatic escalation. What does Iran actually gain from this?
Mimi
Control and leverage. If Iran can make the strait dangerous enough, it strengthens its hand in negotiations over who gets to regulate passage and collect fees. It's economic coercion wrapped in military action.
Mark
The UAE called it piracy. Is that technically accurate, or is that political language?
Mimi
It's both. Legally, attacking merchant vessels is piracy. But politically, Iran would argue it's defending its territorial interests. The language you use depends on whose side you're on.
Mark
Fifteen vessels since February—that's a lot. Why hasn't there been a military response?
Mimi
The UAE and the US are clearly trying to contain this rather than escalate it further. A direct military confrontation in the Strait of Hormuz could disrupt global oil supplies and drag in more players. It's a dangerous game of restraint.
Mark
What about those talks with Oman? Could that actually resolve this?
Mimi
Possibly, but only if both sides are willing to compromise on what they fundamentally want. Iran wants control and revenue. The US and its allies want free passage. Oman is trying to find middle ground, but the attacks suggest Iran isn't waiting for diplomacy to work.
El Pulso
- Two ADNOC tankers were struck in the Strait of Hormuz on Thursday, the second attack in days and the fifteenth since February — a pattern that signals deliberate escalation, not accident.
- The UAE has labeled Iran's actions piracy and economic coercion, warning that targeting vessels in this waterway threatens not just regional stability but the global energy supply.
- Iran, through its Revolutionary Guard, has been asserting the right to regulate strait traffic and charge passage fees — a claim the United States and Gulf states flatly reject and are actively countering with their own maritime restrictions.
- No sailors were harmed in either recent attack, but the absence of casualties has done little to reduce the diplomatic and economic alarm spreading across the region and beyond.
- Quiet negotiations between Iran and Oman over strait governance suggest a diplomatic off-ramp exists, though the attacks at sea continue even as those talks proceed.
In the narrow waters of the Strait of Hormuz — where a fifth of the world's oil passes daily — two vessels belonging to the UAE's state energy company were struck on Thursday evening, the second such attack in as many days. The UAE has named Iran as responsible, calling the incidents piracy and a threat to the arteries of global commerce. The episode is not an isolated provocation but part of a longer contest over who holds authority over one of civilization's most consequential chokepoints, a question that remains dangerously unanswered.
On Thursday evening, two tankers operated by Abu Dhabi National Oil Company were struck while transiting the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow passage through which roughly one-fifth of the world's traded oil flows each day. No one was injured, but the attack was the second in as many days targeting ADNOC vessels in the same waters.
The UAE's Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a swift condemnation early Friday, calling the incident an act of piracy and holding Iran directly responsible. Emirati officials warned that such actions threatened not only regional stability but the integrity of the global energy supply — though they stopped short of detailing the precise damage sustained by either vessel.
The attacks are part of a widening confrontation over control of the strait itself. Iran has been asserting what it frames as a sovereign right to regulate passage and collect fees from transiting ships. The United States has countered with maritime restrictions on Iranian shipping, and Iran's Revolutionary Guard has warned it will act against vessels it considers linked to adversaries or non-compliant with its directives. Since February, ADNOC has reported fifteen of its ships have been struck in these waters.
Iran has not publicly responded to the latest accusations. Meanwhile, it is engaged in negotiations with Oman over future governance of the strait — talks that hint at a possible diplomatic resolution even as the incidents at sea continue to accumulate. The combination of ongoing attacks and unresolved ambitions over one of the world's most vital waterways leaves the situation deeply unstable.
Two ships carrying cargo for the United Arab Emirates' state oil company came under attack while passing through one of the world's most critical shipping lanes on Thursday evening. The vessels, both operated by the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company, were transiting the Strait of Hormuz when they were struck. No one was injured in the incident, but the attack marked the second time in as many days that ADNOC vessels had been targeted in the same waterway.
The UAE's Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement early Friday morning condemning what it called a hostile Iranian attack. The ministry characterized the incident as an act of piracy and warned that such actions posed a direct threat not only to regional stability but to the global energy supply itself. The statement made clear that the Emirati government held Iran responsible for the assault, though it did not specify the exact nature or extent of the damage to either vessel.
This latest incident sits within a broader pattern of escalating tensions over control of the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway through which roughly one-fifth of the world's traded oil passes each day. Iran has been asserting what it views as its right to regulate traffic through the strait and has indicated it wants to charge vessels for passage. The United States, which views such a move as economic coercion, has responded with its own maritime restrictions targeting Iranian shipping. The Iranian government, through statements from its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, has previously warned that it would take action against any ships transiting the strait that it considers linked to its adversaries or that fail to follow Iranian directives.
The attack on Thursday was not an isolated event. Just days earlier, on Saturday, another ADNOC tanker had been struck in the same waters. That incident also resulted in no casualties but drew sharp criticism from governments across the region and the Arab world. The UAE blamed Iran's Revolutionary Guard for that attack as well. Since February, when tensions between the United States and Iran intensified following military action, ADNOC has reported that a total of fifteen of its vessels have been attacked while moving through the Strait of Hormuz.
Iran has not yet responded to the UAE's accusations or commented on the Thursday attack. The country is currently engaged in negotiations with Oman regarding future arrangements for managing the strait, talks that could potentially reshape how the waterway is governed and who controls passage through it. These discussions suggest that diplomatic channels remain open, even as the incidents at sea continue to mount. The pattern of attacks, combined with Iran's stated ambitions to regulate the strait and the international community's resistance to those plans, indicates that the situation remains volatile and unresolved.
Citas Notables
The UAE characterized Iran's actions as piracy and a direct threat to regional stability and global energy supply— UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Iran's Revolutionary Guard has previously threatened action against vessels linked to Tehran's adversaries or those failing to comply with Iranian directives— Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
Quieres la nota completa?
Lee el original en Al Jazeera ↗
War & Conflict