Two men found guilty of murdering dad-of-two Vincent Parsons after stag do in Dublin

A man's life ended in less than a minute on a patch of grass.
Disney and Carlyle stopped their van for just 48 seconds before driving away from the scene of the killing.

On a summer night in August 2019, Vincent Parsons left a stag party in Tallaght and ran. Whatever was said to him inside the Killinarden Inn was enough to send him sprinting out the front door and down the street — running, as the prosecution would later put it, as though his life depended on it. It did.

Parsons was 34 years old, a father of two, and by all accounts a man who had drunk too much that evening. He had become what his brother David described as 'messy' — hugging strangers, getting in people's way, the kind of harmless nuisance that most people ignore. Philip Disney did not ignore him. CCTV footage shown to the Central Criminal Court captured Disney raising his arm, pointing at Parsons, and saying something that sent the man bolting from the pub.

Within minutes, Disney and Sean Carlyle climbed into a black van. They caught up with Parsons on a green area at Killinarden Way, not far from the pub, and beat him to death. The entire stop lasted 48 seconds. Then they drove to Carlyle's home, where Carlyle changed his clothes and left the van at a nearby housing estate. The two men then got a lift back to the Killinarden Inn, returning roughly half an hour after they had left — an attempt, the prosecution argued, to manufacture an alibi suggesting they had never gone anywhere.

It did not hold. Gardaí arrived at Carlyle's house with a warrant less than seven hours after the killing and found the deceased's blood on the shorts Carlyle had been wearing. In the van, investigators recovered a watch belonging to Parsons — a Christmas gift from his daughter, engraved with the words 'To Dad, love Jade, Xmas 2011.'

A pathologist testified that Parsons died from brain damage caused by a shortage of blood flow, itself the result of a heart attack triggered by severe facial injuries and the inhalation of blood. He was beaten to death on a patch of grass in a West Dublin suburb because he had too much to drink at a friend's party.

Disney, 27, of Donomore Crescent, Tallaght, and Carlyle, 30, of Donomore Avenue in the same suburb, both denied the charge of murder. The prosecution described their actions as a joint enterprise, each man acting in common design with the other at every stage — before, during, and after the killing.

On December 16, 2022, a jury of six men and six women returned unanimous guilty verdicts on both men after four hours and 48 minutes of deliberations spread across two days. In the public gallery at the Central Criminal Court, members of the Parsons family and their supporters wept as the foreperson delivered the verdict.

David Parsons, Vincent's brother, had been in the pub that night. He told the court that his brother would never have started a fight with anyone. 'He could be a messy drunk,' David said, 'but was never aggressive. There's not a bad bone in his body.'

Both men now face the mandatory life sentence for murder. Mr Justice Kerida Naidoo adjourned sentencing to January 13, 2023, to allow time for a victim impact statement to be prepared. The Parsons family will have their say before the sentences are formally handed down.

He could be a messy drunk but was never aggressive. There's not a bad bone in his body.
— David Parsons, brother of the victim, speaking in court
The two accused acted together each and every step of the way in common design before and after the killing.
— Lorcan Staines SC, prosecution counsel, paraphrased
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Inventor

What strikes you most about how this killing unfolded?

Model

The speed of it. Forty-eight seconds from the moment the van stopped to the moment they drove away. A man's life ended in less than a minute on a patch of grass.

Inventor

And yet the planning that followed — changing clothes, ditching the van, returning to the pub — suggests they were thinking clearly.

Model

That's what makes it so chilling. The violence was impulsive, but the cover-up was methodical. Two different registers of behavior, back to back.

Inventor

The alibi failed almost immediately. Why?

Model

Blood doesn't lie, and CCTV is everywhere. They were back on camera at the pub within half an hour, but the footage of them leaving was already there. And Carlyle still had Parsons' blood on his shorts when gardaí knocked on his door.

Inventor

The watch found in the van — what does that detail do to you?

Model

It anchors the whole thing in something unbearably human. A Christmas gift from a little girl to her father, with her name on it. Found in a van belonging to the man who helped kill him.

Inventor

His brother said he had no bad bones in his body. Does that change how we read the story?

Model

It clarifies it. Parsons wasn't a threat. He was drunk and affectionate and annoying. That's the whole of it. That's what was enough.

Inventor

What does the unanimous verdict tell us?

Model

That twelve people, after nearly five hours of deliberation, saw no reasonable doubt. The evidence — the footage, the blood, the watch, the timeline — left nowhere to stand.

Inventor

What comes next for the family?

Model

A victim impact statement, then sentencing in January. They get to speak before the sentences are formally recorded. After three years, that moment matters.

Contact Us FAQ