In a season of market turbulence, two ASX-listed exchange-traded funds emerge as instruments for investors willing to wager on the future shape of the digital economy. The BetaShares Crypto Innovators ETF and the BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF each carry elevated risk, yet each speaks to a broader human reckoning with how money moves and how institutions protect themselves in an increasingly networked world. Their recent price declines invite a perennial question: is this the wreckage of a passing fad, or the discounted entry point into something enduring?
Two High-Risk ETFs Worth Considering for ASX Investors
The entire asset class could fade into irrelevance.
So these are both tech-adjacent plays, but they're operating at very different risk levels. What's the actual difference in volatility we're talking about?
CRYP is essentially a leveraged bet on the crypto sector's recovery. When Bitcoin moves, these mining and trading companies move faster and further. HACK is more like a concentrated tech bet—it'll move with the broader tech selloff, but it's not as extreme as crypto.
Do we know the actual volatility figures, or are we just inferring this from the holdings? And when the article says these are "in the buy zone," what's that based on? Price decline alone?
The article doesn't provide specific volatility metrics or valuation thresholds. It's more of a "these have fallen, so they might be worth looking at" argument.
Fair enough. But for someone actually considering CRYP, what's the realistic downside scenario?
Crypto could contract further. Regulatory crackdowns could accelerate. Mining could become unprofitable. These companies could see their revenue streams dry up entirely.
And there's no floor on that, right? Unlike a dividend-paying stock, if the sector collapses, there's no earnings stream to anchor valuations.
Correct. It's a sector bet, not a company bet. You're betting the entire ecosystem survives and thrives.
What about HACK? Is the cybersecurity demand thesis as binary?
Less so. Even in a recession, organizations still need to defend against attacks. But demand could plateau, competition could intensify, and margins could compress.
And the article mentions recent Australian cyberattacks as justification for demand growth. But is that actually predictive? Do cyberattacks drive spending, or do they just create noise?
That's the open question. The article assumes rising threat awareness translates to rising spending. It's plausible, but not guaranteed.
Le Pouls
- Both ETFs have been hit hard by 2022's broad market selloff, with crypto-adjacent stocks suffering especially steep losses that have tested even committed investors.
- Australia's wave of high-profile cyberattacks has sharpened the urgency around digital security, lending the HACK ETF a real-world narrative that goes beyond abstract growth projections.
- CRYP's indirect exposure to crypto — through miners, hardware makers, and trading platforms — means its volatility can exceed even the already-wild swings of Bitcoin itself.
- Patient investors are being asked to hold conviction through significant drawdowns, betting that long-term structural demand for both crypto infrastructure and cybersecurity will ultimately reward the wait.
In a season of market turbulence, two ASX-listed exchange-traded funds emerge as instruments for investors willing to wager on the future shape of the digital economy. The BetaShares Crypto Innovators ETF and the BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF each carry elevated risk, yet each speaks to a broader human reckoning with how money moves and how institutions protect themselves in an increasingly networked world. Their recent price declines invite a perennial question: is this the wreckage of a passing fad, or the discounted entry point into something enduring?
For investors with genuine tolerance for volatility and a long enough runway to absorb sharp losses, two ETFs listed on the ASX are drawing attention this month — not despite their recent beatings, but partly because of them.
The BetaShares Crypto Innovators ETF, ticker CRYP, takes an indirect route into the digital asset world. Rather than holding Bitcoin or Ethereum outright, it owns shares in the companies that sustain the crypto ecosystem: miners, hardware manufacturers, and trading platforms. Names like Coinbase, Riot Blockchain, and Canaan sit at its core. When crypto surges, these businesses tend to amplify the move — and when it crashes, they fall harder still. The underlying bet is that cryptocurrencies represent a durable fixture of the financial system, and that owning the infrastructure around them offers compelling upside. It's a high-conviction wager with no guaranteed floor.
The BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF, ticker HACK, occupies a less extreme but still elevated risk tier. Its holdings — Crowdstrike, Cloudflare, Fortinet, Okta, and others — are companies selling defense to a world that keeps discovering how exposed it is. Australia's recent string of significant cyberattacks has made that threat viscerally real, and the global pattern is consistent: awareness rises, budgets follow. Like most growth-oriented technology stocks, cybersecurity shares have been punished this year, which proponents argue has created an opening for patient capital.
Neither fund suits someone with near-term cash needs or a low tolerance for watching a portfolio contract. Both demand sector conviction and the psychological endurance to sit through prolonged drawdowns. But for those who believe in where digital assets and digital security are headed, understanding these instruments is a reasonable starting point.
If you have the stomach for volatility and the time horizon to ride out sharp swings, two exchange-traded funds listed on the ASX might deserve a closer look this month. Both carry elevated risk. Both have been battered by broader market weakness. And both, depending on your conviction about their underlying sectors, could offer the kind of asymmetric payoff that attracts investors willing to accept real losses in pursuit of outsized gains.
The first is the BetaShares Crypto Innovators ETF, trading under the ticker CRYP. It doesn't own cryptocurrencies directly—no Bitcoin, no Ethereum sitting in a vault somewhere. Instead, it holds shares in the companies that have built their businesses around the crypto ecosystem: the miners who process transactions and earn new coins as reward, the equipment manufacturers who sell the specialized hardware those miners depend on, the trading platforms where people buy and sell digital assets. When cryptocurrencies surge, these companies tend to move in sympathy. When crypto crashes, as it has done repeatedly this year, they crash harder. The fund's holdings include names like Canaan, Coinbase, Riot Blockchain, and Silvergate—companies whose fortunes rise and fall with the sector's mood swings. The bet here is straightforward: if you believe cryptocurrencies are a durable part of the financial system and will eventually recover from their current malaise, then owning a piece of the infrastructure that supports them could be compelling. But that's a big if. There's no guarantee crypto ever returns to its previous peaks. The entire asset class could contract further, or fade into irrelevance. For most investors, this is the riskier of the two options.
The second candidate is the BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF, ticker HACK. It occupies a different risk tier—higher than a broad market index fund, but nowhere near as volatile as a crypto play. The fund tilts heavily toward technology companies, which already makes it more sensitive to interest rate moves and growth concerns than the broader market. But its specific focus is on firms selling cybersecurity solutions: Accenture, Cisco, Cloudflare, Crowdstrike, Fortinet, Okta, and Splunk, among others. The thesis is straightforward. Australia has experienced a series of significant cyberattacks in recent years, and the pattern is global. As organizations wake up to the reality of the threat, they spend more on defense. Companies in this space should benefit from that rising demand over time. Like most technology stocks, cybersecurity shares have been hammered this year as investors fled growth assets. That decline, the argument goes, has created an opportunity for patient investors who believe the long-term tailwinds remain intact.
Neither of these funds is suitable for someone who needs their money in the next few years or who loses sleep over portfolio swings. Both have fallen sharply from their highs. Both require conviction about their respective sectors and a willingness to endure periods of significant drawdown. But for investors with a genuine high risk tolerance, a long time horizon, and a thesis about where technology and digital assets are headed, they're worth understanding in detail before deciding whether they belong in a portfolio.
Citations marquantes
There's arguably no higher risk asset class to invest in than cryptocurrencies.— The Motley Fool Australia
With recent cyberattacks in Australia showing just how important cybersecurity services are, the companies in this fund appear well-positioned for long-term growth as demand increases.— The Motley Fool Australia