Before a family's son steps back into the ring against a rival, a documentary about that family has aired, and a critic has judged it a portrait made without the other side's voice. The question it raises is old and familiar: how a story told by one camp can shape how the public sees a contest that belongs to two. Boxing has always mixed sport with myth, lineage and grudge, and television has long been the stage on which those myths are polished. Here the critic sees a hero's story dressed as neutral reporting, and in a broadcaster already under doubt about its balance, that reading carries we
TV Review: BBC3's The Eubanks Is an Hour of Hero-Worship Ahead of the Benn Rematch
More one-sided than a bout between Muhammad Ali and Little Shirley Temple
Why does a TV review of a boxing documentary matter beyond the sport?
Because of the timing. The film aired just days before Eubank Jnr fights Conor Benn again in London, and Stevens says Benn had no part in it.
So the complaint is about balance, not quality?
Mostly. He calls it hero-worship and a promotional video, but he also says the first 20 minutes were muddled for anyone outside boxing.
Worth saying plainly: this is one critic's opinion. Calling it a promo is a judgment, not a finding. We don't have any statement from the BBC or the producers in this piece.
What did the film actually lean on?
The father-son story. Eubank Snr refused to speak to his son for years after being fired as his trainer, and now shares the ringside. It also assumed viewers knew the Eubank-Benn rivalry.
And the claim that Benn's camp contributed nothing comes from the reviewer. We can't tell whether they were asked or declined.
Stevens also pokes at Eubank Jnr's standing.
He notes the IBO belt isn't one of the major titles, and that the film showed him in Dubai with a McLaren.
The wealth question is speculation by the writer. He says himself he doesn't know if it's real or a pose.
What should readers watch for?
Saturday's rematch, and whether anyone formally questions the BBC's scheduling.
O Pulso
- A BBC3 documentary on the Eubank family aired days before Eubank Jnr meets Conor Benn again in London, and it featured nothing from Benn's camp.
- Critic Christopher Stevens calls the hour a promotional video, with hero-worship for the father and relentless PR for the son.
- The muddled opening, zigzagging between old bouts, a reality series and a family feud, leaves casual viewers lost.
- The film assumes an audience already steeped in the Eubank-Benn rivalry, and the critic argues that feud is the only reason the rematch matters.
- The rematch is set for Saturday, and this criticism may sharpen scrutiny of how the BBC handles sport tied to live events.
Before a family's son steps back into the ring against a rival, a documentary about that family has aired, and a critic has judged it a portrait made without the other side's voice. The question it raises is old and familiar: how a story told by one camp can shape how the public sees a contest that belongs to two. Boxing has always mixed sport with myth, lineage and grudge, and television has long been the stage on which those myths are polished. Here the critic sees a hero's story dressed as neutral reporting, and in a broadcaster already under doubt about its balance, that reading carries weight.
A documentary about one boxing family has aired just days before that family's son is due back in the ring against a rival whose camp had no say in it. Christopher Stevens, reviewing The Eubanks: Like Father, Like Son for the Daily Mail, says the BBC3 hour, later repeated on BBC1, is so one-sided it could pass for a promotional video. Chris Eubank Jnr meets Conor Benn again in London on Saturday, and Stevens calls the decision to screen the film without Benn's side an extraordinarily biased choice.
Stevens sketches the father as a mannered eccentric with a lisp, a monocle and a taste for driving an American truck, remembered by boxing fans as a 1990s middleweight champion and by everyone else for his reality TV turns. The son fares worse in the review. Stevens notes that Eubank Jnr holds an IBO belt the critic says is not counted among the major titles, and wonders whether his Dubai lifestyle reflects real wealth or a carefully staged Instagram pose.
The structure also draws fire. The opening twenty minutes jump between the April fight, a meeting of the two Chrises, the father's heyday and an old reality series, leaving non-boxing viewers confused. The film also assumes audiences already know the feud between the elder Eubank and Nigel Benn, which Stevens believes is the only reason the sons' fight holds any interest.
The review is one critic's opinion, not a ruling on the BBC's impartiality. Still, with the rematch approaching, its timing may sharpen questions about how the broadcaster covers sport connected to live events.
A documentary about one boxing family is set to air days before that family's son climbs into the ring against a rival whose camp had no say in it. That is the complaint Christopher Stevens raises in his Daily Mail review of The Eubanks: Like Father, Like Son, shown on BBC3 and repeated on BBC1 this week. Chris Eubank Jnr is due to fight Conor Benn again in London on Saturday, and Stevens calls it an extraordinarily biased decision to screen an hour praising one fighter and his father with no contribution from the other side.
Stevens does not soften his verdict. He calls the programme more one-sided than a bout between Muhammad Ali and Little Shirley Temple, and says it could easily have passed for a promotional video for the Eubank camp: an hour of hero-worship for Eubank Snr and relentless PR for his son. He opens with a jab at the BBC itself, remarking that balance and impartiality are no longer things people expect from the corporation, and he adds, "Just ask Donald Trump."
The review sketches the Chris Eubank most viewers know. He is a mannered eccentric, recognisable by his lisp, his Bertie Wooster-style monocle and his habit of driving an American big rig truck when he feels the world is not paying him enough attention. Boxing fans remember him as a middleweight world champion in the 1990s. Everyone else, Stevens writes, knows him for what he has done since retiring, including a run of reality TV. He finished ninth on ITV's I'm A Celebrity. On Channel 4's Scared Of The Dark he appeared aloof, anxious and troubled, and he withdrew before the series ended.
His son gets less generous treatment. Stevens says Eubank Jnr is not even famous enough for I'm A Celebrity. He currently holds the International Boxing Organisation middleweight belt, though the critic notes that the IBO is not counted among the major titles. The documentary nonetheless showed him living in Dubai and driving a McLaren supercar. Stevens wonders whether he is breathtakingly wealthy or has simply mastered the Instagram-era trick of striking a successful pose for an audience that will forget him eight seconds later.
The structure drew criticism too. For viewers with little interest in boxing, Stevens says, the first 20 minutes were a confused muddle. The film zigzagged from the April bout between Eubank Jnr and Benn, to a meeting between the two Chrises months later, to Eubank Snr's heyday three decades ago, and then to clips from a short-lived 2003 reality series, At Home With The Eubanks. Much was made of the fact that Eubank Snr refused to speak to his son for years after being fired as his trainer, yet now graciously agrees to share the limelight at ringside.
Stevens also says the producers assumed viewers already knew about the rivalry between the elder Eubank and Nigel Benn, Conor's father. That feud, he argues, is the only reason anyone could care about the sons' fight. He compares their rematch to a comeback album by Julian Lennon and James McCartney: famous family names with barely a smidgeon of the original talent.
The column closes with a lighter item about Hidden Wonders on More4, in which Sandi Toksvig grumbles that she always does the driving as she and archaeologist Raksha Dave travel to a dig at the site of Cookham Abbey. Raksha points out that she can't drive. Stevens's joke is that Toksvig deserves a peaked cap and gloves.
The rematch takes place in London on Saturday. This is a critic's opinion piece rather than a ruling on the BBC's impartiality, but its timing may sharpen scrutiny of how the broadcaster handles sport coverage tied to live events.
Citações Notáveis
It could easily have been a promotional video for the Eubank camp.— Christopher Stevens, Daily Mail TV critic