In the long and grinding story of Russia's war on Ukraine, a moment has arrived where American policy appears to bend toward Moscow just weeks after new sanctions were enacted to press Putin the other way. A diesel arrangement that would let Russia sell fuel into American and global markets, alongside a speed cap on the military-grade Starlink service that Ukraine depends on, has left many asking whether Washington is trading the fate of a invaded nation for domestic relief at home. Whatever the motives in Washington, the effect, as this account sees it, is that Ukraine is weakened and Putin i
Trump's Diesel Deal and Starlink Retreat Hand Putin a Major Win Over Ukraine
Putin could not be scripting this better.
Why does a diesel deal matter so much to a war in Ukraine?
Because the September sanctions were meant to squeeze Russia's energy income. A deal for Russia to supply diesel to US and global markets pulls in the opposite direction, and it came just four weeks after Trump signed them.
Worth saying this is analysis, not straight news. The calling it Putin's biggest victory since 2022 is the author's judgment. What the piece actually documents is the deal and Trump's stated reasons.
And his reasons?
Diesel prices, largely driven by the war in Iran, and a midterm fight to keep the House and Senate. He said the US has got nothing back other than high diesel.
The link between prices and midterms is the author's reading of motive. Trump's quote supports the price complaint, not the electoral calculation.
The Starlink story seems murkier.
It is. Musk blamed the US military and the president. The Wall Street Journal reported Musk limited access himself, though one source said he spoke to senior officials, including Trump, first.
Right, and that's one unnamed person against other officials who say Musk acted unilaterally and Trump ordered no retribution. Whether Trump knew or approved is not established.
What about the casualty figure?
Up to 1 million Russian casualties is described as widely believed, not confirmed. The article says actual numbers aren't available.
Le Pouls
- Four weeks after new energy sanctions became law, Trump struck a diesel deal with Putin that critics say guts their purpose.
- Ukraine's military Starlink service was slowed, and Zelenskyy warns lives could be lost as blame passes between Musk and the White House.
- Republicans including Tillis and Fitzpatrick are publicly calling the moves capitulation and heartbreaking, ahead of the midterms.
- A proposed US-China-Russia summit that would leave Ukraine out of the room is still on the table, and Trump's response is the thing to watch.
In the long and grinding story of Russia's war on Ukraine, a moment has arrived where American policy appears to bend toward Moscow just weeks after new sanctions were enacted to press Putin the other way. A diesel arrangement that would let Russia sell fuel into American and global markets, alongside a speed cap on the military-grade Starlink service that Ukraine depends on, has left many asking whether Washington is trading the fate of a invaded nation for domestic relief at home. Whatever the motives in Washington, the effect, as this account sees it, is that Ukraine is weakened and Putin is strengthened, and the human cost of that shift falls on those already living under missile fire.
Four weeks after Donald Trump signed a new round of sanctions on Russia's energy sector into law, he struck a deal with Vladimir Putin to let Russia supply diesel to the American and global market. Many observers, including some Republicans, see it as a reversal that undercuts the sanctions' purpose of pushing Putin toward ending the war. The analysis behind this account describes it as one of Putin's biggest economic and propaganda victories since 2022.
The motive, the piece suggests, is domestic. Diesel prices are high, partly because of the war in Iran, and Republicans are fighting to hold Congress in the midterms. Critics across both parties answer that rewarding an illegal invasion would only invite further aggression. Senator Thom Tillis called the capitulation unconscionable.
The Starlink episode deepened the unease. A slowdown of the military-grade service Ukraine relies on was traced by the Wall Street Journal to Elon Musk, though some officials say he acted alone and others say he consulted Trump first. Zelenskyy warned people could die, and Trump said he would like to find out who was responsible.
The story also carries a long shadow of Putin's history with American presidents, each of whom hoped for a good relationship and was disappointed. Thousands of Ukrainian civilians have been killed by Russian missiles, and Russian casualties are widely believed to be as high as one million. What comes next is whether Trump pursues the proposed three-way summit and how his party responds before November.
Four weeks after signing a new round of sanctions on Russia's energy sector into law, Donald Trump has made a deal with Vladimir Putin for Russia to supply diesel to what he calls the "American and global marketplace." The reversal has stunned even some Republicans, and ABC's analysis describes it as Putin's biggest economic and propaganda victory since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022.
The sanctions were signed in September. They were championed by the late senator Lindsey Graham and named in his honour. The diesel arrangement cuts against their purpose, which was to inflict enough economic pain on Russia to push Putin toward ending the war. The analysis notes the asymmetry: if Ukraine laid down its weapons now, it would lose the fifth of its territory Russia has taken and risk losing the whole country, whereas if Russia stopped, the fighting would stop.
The motive, the piece argues, is domestic politics. Diesel prices are high, largely because of the war in Iran, and that is one reason Republicans are fighting to hold both the House and the Senate at the midterm elections. "We have given tremendous amounts to Ukraine," Trump said this week. "We've got nothing back other than high diesel." Leading figures in both parties reject that framing. They argue that letting Putin conquer Ukraine would reward an illegal invasion and might encourage him to turn to other European countries. Republican senator Thom Tillis called it unconscionable that the administration is capitulating to a Russian dictator who illegally invaded Ukraine and butchers innocent civilians daily.
Other signals point the same direction. Trump has said he is interested in a Moscow proposal for a summit of the US, China and Russia, a meeting that would elevate Putin and discuss a war without the attacked country in the room. This week, Trump's Ukraine negotiator, Steve Witkoff, also called Putin a "humanitarian" after Russia released an American it had held in prison for four years. For families of the thousands of Ukrainian civilians killed by Russian missiles, the article says, the word would be hard to hear.
Then there is Starlink. In recent days it emerged that either Elon Musk or the White House had ordered a slowdown of the military-grade version of the service that Ukraine relies on. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said people could die because of the change. Musk put the responsibility on Trump, writing on X that limits on speed or usage are decided by the US military and ultimately the president. Trump said he did not know who was responsible but would "like to find out."
The Wall Street Journal reported this week that it was Musk who limited Ukraine's access. Some US officials told the paper Musk acted "unilaterally" and that Trump did not specifically order any retribution against Ukraine. But one person familiar with the matter said Musk spoke to multiple senior administration officials, including Trump, before imposing the speed cap. Republican congressman Brian Fitzpatrick, who sits on the House Oversight Committee, told CNN the US military would have to know about any change to a military-grade Starlink, and called the situation "heartbreaking." The analysis concludes that whoever gave the order, Ukraine was weakened, and that Musk, who appears to be back in regular contact with Trump, evidently felt sure Trump would not object.
The piece places this within Putin's long history with American presidents. It notes Russia 1, the country's most-watched network, "welcomed" Trump back two days after his re-election while showing nude photographs of Melania Trump, which the author reads as a mobster's mix of kind words and menace. Putin has played out a similar psychodrama with Clinton, Bush, Obama and Biden, each of whom hoped for a good relationship and ended disappointed. Stephen Hadley, national security adviser from 2005 for four years, told PBS Frontline that Putin saw in Trump a "penchant for authoritarianism" and said: "What's not to like if you're Vladimir Putin?"
On terms, Trump wants Ukraine to accept that Russia keeps the land it has taken since 2022, and Zelenskyy has said he would consider a ceasefire along a frozen frontline. Russia wants the entire Donbas. Exact figures are unavailable, but Russian casualties, including dead, wounded and missing, are widely believed to run as high as 1 million. What to watch next is whether Trump pursues the three-way summit and how Republicans respond ahead of the midterms.
Citations marquantes
It's unconscionable that this administration is capitulating to a Russian dictator who illegally invaded Ukraine and butchers innocent civilians every single day.— Republican senator Thom Tillis
Any limits on speed or usage are decided by the US military and ultimately POTUS.— Elon Musk, on X