Trump's Board of Peace unveils $2.45B Gaza reconstruction plan amid stalled peace efforts

Over 1,300 Palestinians, mostly civilians, killed since the October ceasefire; most Palestinians remain displaced in tent camps or ruins of former homes.
Palestinians don't need a slogan; they need a solution.
Tony Blair, on the Board of Peace's executive, on what Gaza reconstruction actually requires.
Mark

So the Board of Peace is proposing $2.45 billion for Gaza reconstruction. That sounds like a substantial commitment. What's actually in the plan?

Mimi

It's 66 projects over six months—temporary housing, clearing rubble, fixing hospitals, restoring power and water, deploying a security force. Practical things that would let people start rebuilding their lives.

Luke

But here's the thing: the board itself says full reconstruction will cost $35.2 billion medium-term and $71.4 billion over a decade. So this $2.45 billion is less than 7 percent of what's actually needed. It's a down payment, not a solution.

Mark

Why is the plan being unveiled now if the ceasefire has already stalled?

Mimi

Because the ceasefire is still technically in place, even if it's not working. The board is saying: if the political conditions improve, here's what we can do immediately. It's a readiness statement.

Luke

But the political conditions haven't improved in a year. Israel still occupies 60 percent of Gaza. Hamas hasn't disarmed. The board's own representative says progress depends on both things happening. Neither has.

Mark

What does the ceasefire actually look like on the ground right now?

Mimi

It's slowed the violence, but it hasn't stopped it. Over 1,300 Palestinians, mostly civilians, have been killed since October. Most people are still living in tents or in ruins. There's no international peacekeeping force, no new Palestinian government.

Luke

The Israeli military says it's targeting Hamas militants. Gaza health authorities say most of the dead are civilians. That's a significant disagreement about what's actually happening, and it matters for understanding whether the ceasefire is holding or just paused.

Mark

So what would it take for this reconstruction plan to actually move forward?

Mimi

Hamas would have to fully disarm and leave Gaza. Israel would have to withdraw from the territory it occupies. Both sides would have to agree to an international security presence and a new Palestinian administration.

Luke

And none of those things are happening. The board's high representative called on Israel to reduce military operations, but he also said everything depends on Hamas disarming first. That's the deadlock in one sentence.

  • A $2.45 billion reconstruction plan has been unveiled for Gaza, but it is a blueprint for a future that the present refuses to allow — the ceasefire it assumes has never truly held.
  • Over 1,300 Palestinians, mostly civilians, have been killed since the October ceasefire, while most of the population remains displaced in tent camps or the rubble of former homes.
  • Israel continues to occupy roughly 60 percent of Gaza and conditions its withdrawal on Hamas fully disarming — a demand Hamas has signaled willingness to consider but never acted upon.
  • The Board of Peace's high representative has called on both sides to move simultaneously — Hamas to disarm, Israel to pull back — but neither condition shows any sign of being met.
  • The plan itself is concrete: 66 projects covering temporary housing, hospital repairs, solar power units, tunnel sealing, and border restoration — serious work waiting on an unserious peace.

Nearly a year after a ceasefire was meant to transform Gaza, Trump's Board of Peace has released a $2.45 billion reconstruction blueprint — a detailed, earnest proposal for a territory where the political ground beneath any rebuilding remains deeply unstable. The plan envisions 66 projects addressing shelter, rubble, hospitals, and infrastructure, as a first installment toward what may ultimately cost over $100 billion across a decade. Yet the ceasefire it depends upon has become a frozen conflict: Israel still holds 60 percent of Gaza's territory, Hamas has not disarmed, and more than 1,300 Palestinians have died since the agreement took effect. Humanity has produced a blueprint for recovery while the conditions that would make recovery possible remain entirely unmet.

Nearly a year after a ceasefire was supposed to reshape Gaza, the territory remains fractured and largely unreconstructed. On Wednesday, Trump's Board of Peace released a six-month reconstruction blueprint priced at $2.45 billion — a first step toward what the board estimates will ultimately require $35.2 billion for medium-term recovery and another $71.4 billion over the following decade.

The plan is concrete and granular: 66 separate projects aimed at stabilizing the enclave before larger rebuilding can begin. It covers temporary housing, rubble clearance, hospital repairs, economic jumpstarting, a multinational security force, restored border crossings, electricity and water systems, and 25,000 portable solar units. Tony Blair, sitting on the board's executive, put it plainly: Palestinians in Gaza 'don't need a slogan; they need a solution.'

But the plan exists in a landscape where the ceasefire has become a hollow word. The October agreement was supposed to bring Israeli military withdrawal, Hamas disarmament, an international peacekeeping force, and a new Palestinian administration. None of these have materialized. Israel still controls roughly 60 percent of Gaza's territory and has continued military operations it describes as targeting Hamas militants. Gaza's health authorities report over 1,300 Palestinians killed since the ceasefire — the vast majority civilians.

Hamas has not surrendered its weapons. Israel has made clear it will not withdraw until Hamas fully disarms and leaves Gaza entirely. Neither side has moved, and the ceasefire has become a frozen conflict rather than a path toward peace. On the ground, most Palestinians remain in tent camps or ruins. No peacekeeping force has arrived. No new Palestinian government has taken shape.

The $2.45 billion proposal is a serious document addressing real needs. But it is ultimately a plan for reconstruction in a place where the political conditions for reconstruction do not yet exist — a detailed answer to a question that the parties in conflict have not yet agreed to ask.

Nearly a year after a ceasefire was supposed to reshape Gaza, the territory remains fractured and largely unreconstructed. On Wednesday, Trump's Board of Peace released a six-month reconstruction blueprint carrying a price tag of $2.45 billion—a first step toward what the board estimates will ultimately require $35.2 billion for medium-term recovery and another $71.4 billion over the following decade.

The plan itself is concrete and granular: 66 separate projects aimed at stabilizing the enclave before larger rebuilding can begin. The board proposes funding for temporary housing, clearing rubble from destroyed neighborhoods, repairing hospitals, jumpstarting economic activity, and deploying a multinational security force. The proposal also includes restoring border crossings, rebuilding electricity and water systems, installing 25,000 portable solar power units, and permanently sealing tunnels beneath sites needed for priority reconstruction work. Tony Blair, the former British prime minister who sits on the board's executive, framed the challenge plainly: Palestinians in Gaza "don't need a slogan; they need a solution."

But the plan exists in a landscape where the ceasefire itself has become a hollow word. The agreement reached last October was supposed to be transformative. It included provisions for Israeli military withdrawal from Gaza, the disarmament of Hamas, the arrival of an international peacekeeping force, and the establishment of a new Palestinian administration to manage daily governance. None of these have materialized in any meaningful way.

Israel still controls approximately 60 percent of Gaza's territory. Since the ceasefire took effect, Israeli forces have carried out regular military operations that the Israeli military characterizes as targeting Hamas militants. Gaza's health authorities report that over 1,300 Palestinians, the vast majority of them civilians, have been killed in that period. The Israeli military says four of its soldiers have died. The numbers themselves tell the story of a ceasefire that has slowed violence without stopping it.

Hamas, designated a terrorist organization by multiple countries, has not surrendered its weapons. The group has occasionally signaled willingness to do so, but those signals have not translated into action. Israel has made clear it will not withdraw from occupied areas until Hamas fully disarms and leaves Gaza entirely. This condition sits at the center of the impasse: neither side has moved, and the ceasefire has become a frozen conflict rather than a path toward peace.

On the ground, the human reality remains dire. Most Palestinians in Gaza continue to live in tent camps or among the ruins of homes destroyed during the fighting. No international peacekeeping force has arrived. No new Palestinian government has taken shape. Nikolay Mladenov, the board's high representative, acknowledged that progress hinges on Hamas disarming, but he has also called on Israel to reduce its military operations. The statement itself captures the bind: both conditions must be met, neither shows signs of being met, and the people living in the territory pay the cost of the standoff.

The $2.45 billion proposal is a serious document addressing real needs. But it is also a plan for reconstruction in a place where the political conditions for reconstruction do not yet exist. The board is essentially saying: here is what could happen if the ceasefire became real. Whether that happens depends on decisions that lie entirely outside the scope of any reconstruction budget.

Palestinians in Gaza don't need a slogan; they need a solution.
— Tony Blair, Board of Peace executive board member
Progress relies heavily on Hamas disarming, but Israel should also scale back its military operations.
— Nikolay Mladenov, Board of Peace high representative
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur Deutsche Welle ↗
Nous contacter FAQ