Trump, Xi tackle Middle East as Iran unveils seven-day peace plan

The seven-month conflict has killed thousands, degraded Iran's conventional forces, and prompted a humanitarian crisis with rising acute malnutrition among Yemeni children.
The choice now rests with the United States.
Iran's Foreign Minister on the seven-day peace proposal requiring US sanctions relief to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
Mark

So Iran is saying it can reopen the Strait of Hormuz in seven days if the US lifts sanctions. That sounds like a concrete offer. Why hasn't the US just said yes or no?

Mimi

Because it's not just about the strait. Iran is also saying it won't budge on nuclear enrichment, even if the US accepts this peace plan. Trump has made it clear Iran can never have nuclear weapons. Those two positions don't fit together easily.

Luke

Right, and we should be careful here. The US official said discussions are "positive and constructive," but that's the kind of language diplomats use when nothing is actually decided. We don't know if the US is seriously considering the Iranian terms or just being polite through Qatar.

Mark

What about China's role? Trump warned Xi not to help Iran. Did that warning actually change anything?

Mimi

China depends on Middle Eastern oil, so it has its own reasons to want the strait open. Xi pushed for returning to the June ceasefire framework. But the reports about China supplying Iran with air-defence systems and helping with sanctions evasion—those are real concerns for Washington.

Luke

Though we should note: Perdue said China "assured" them they're not providing support. That's a statement from one side. We don't have independent confirmation of what China is actually doing, or what it will do going forward.

Mark

The humanitarian piece—the malnutrition in Yemen. Is that directly caused by the war, or was it already a problem?

Mimi

The UN children's agency specifically tied the rise in acute malnutrition to the violence. Yemen was already fragile, but the conflict has made it worse.

Luke

The agency reported it on September 25, but we don't have numbers on how many children or how sharp the increase is. It's documented, but the scale isn't spelled out in what we have.

Mark

So where does this actually go? Is there any real chance of a deal?

Mimi

That depends on whether the US can separate the nuclear question from the immediate ceasefire. If it can't, the seven-day plan stays on the table but doesn't get accepted.

Luke

And we're watching whether China actually honors its assurance to Trump. If Beijing keeps helping Iran evade sanctions, the whole diplomatic effort could collapse.

  • Iran's Foreign Minister unveiled a seven-day ultimatum at the UN: lift the blockade, release frozen funds, and waive oil sanctions — or the strait stays closed and the fighting continues.
  • Trump warned Xi directly that US-China relations hinge on Beijing withholding support from Tehran, even as reports surfaced of Chinese missile transfers and sanctions-evasion assistance to Iran.
  • China, dependent on Middle Eastern oil and watching Houthi attacks choke Red Sea shipping lanes, pressed Trump to revive the June ceasefire framework as a path toward broader settlement.
  • Iran's senior officials made clear that no peace deal — however favorable — would purchase any flexibility on the nuclear program, leaving the conflict's deepest fault line unresolved.
  • The war has metastasized across the region: Hezbollah engaged in Lebanon, Houthis targeting Saudi interests in Yemen, Iraqi militias blamed for a pipeline strike, and Gulf states accelerating military coordination under the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement.
  • The UN children's agency reported rising acute malnutrition among Yemeni children on the same day diplomats were trading proposals, placing the human cost of the seven-month war in stark relief.

Seven months after fighting began in the Middle East, the world's two largest powers have entered direct conversation over how it ends. On the margins of the United Nations General Assembly, Presidents Trump and Xi met in Washington as Iran placed a concrete seven-day peace proposal on the table — one that would reopen the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for sanctions relief. The negotiation reveals how thoroughly a regional war can become a global reckoning, touching oil markets, nuclear ambitions, humanitarian survival, and the fragile architecture of great-power relations.

The Middle East war that began in late February has now drawn Washington and Beijing into direct negotiation over its terms. As Xi Jinping concluded a three-day state visit to Washington on September 25 — timed deliberately to coincide with the United Nations General Assembly — he and President Trump discussed a conflict that has upended global oil markets and pulled in regional actors from Lebanon to Yemen.

At the UN, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi laid out a stark proposal: if the United States lifted its blockade on Iranian ports, released frozen funds, and waived oil sanctions, Iran would reopen the Strait of Hormuz and halt fighting on all fronts within seven days. A US official described ongoing mediated talks as 'positive and constructive,' though Washington had not publicly committed to the terms.

China's stake in the outcome is concrete — the country depends heavily on Middle Eastern oil, and Iranian threats to tanker traffic, combined with Houthi attacks along Red Sea chokepoints, have created genuine supply anxiety. Xi urged Trump to return to a June ceasefire framework as the basis for broader negotiations. Trump delivered a sharper message in return: Chinese support for Iran, direct or indirect, would be unacceptable. His ambassador to Beijing said Xi had personally assured Trump that no such support was being provided — an assurance complicated by reports of Chinese missile transfers and sanctions-evasion assistance to Tehran.

Seven months of fighting have killed thousands, degraded Iran's conventional forces, and spread the conflict across the region. Iranian drones have struck Gulf allies, Houthi fighters have targeted Saudi interests, and Iraqi militias were blamed for a pipeline attack that briefly removed Saudi oil from global markets. Saudi Arabia, meanwhile, moved to consolidate its position — hosting defence officials from Turkey and Pakistan in Riyadh as foreign ministers from all three countries gathered under the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement.

Yet even as diplomats maneuvered, Iran's senior officials signaled that no peace deal would purchase flexibility on the nuclear question. Tehran would grant no concessions on uranium enrichment — a position that sits uneasily with Trump's vow that Iran will never develop nuclear weapons. The seven-month war, which began as a confrontation between two powers, has become a test of whether the world's major players can manage a conflict that now touches every critical interest at once.

The Middle East war that began in late February has now drawn the world's two largest powers into direct negotiation over its terms. On September 25, as Chinese President Xi Jinping concluded a three-day state visit to Washington, he and President Trump discussed the seven-month conflict that has upended global oil markets and pulled in regional allies across the Persian Gulf and beyond. The timing was deliberate: Xi's visit overlapped with the United Nations General Assembly, where Iran and the United States were already engaged in quiet talks brokered by Qatar.

Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi stood before reporters at the UN and laid out a concrete proposal. His government had formally unveiled a seven-day plan the day before. The terms were stark: if the United States lifted its blockade on Iranian ports, released frozen Iranian funds, and waived its oil sanctions, Iran would reopen the Strait of Hormuz and halt fighting on all fronts—including in Lebanon, where Iranian-backed Hezbollah has been engaged with Israeli forces. The clock would start the moment Washington accepted. "The choice now rests with the United States," Araqchi said. A US official, speaking anonymously, acknowledged that discussions were underway through mediators and described them as "positive and constructive," though Washington had not yet publicly committed to the Iranian terms.

China's interest in the outcome is not abstract. The country depends heavily on Middle Eastern oil, and the conflict has already disrupted that flow. Iranian threats against tankers transiting the Strait of Hormuz, combined with attacks by Iranian-allied Houthi fighters along Red Sea chokepoints, have created genuine supply anxiety. Xi pressed Trump to return to a June framework agreement that had briefly produced a ceasefire, urging both sides toward wider negotiations on a broader settlement. Trump, for his part, delivered a different message: he warned Xi that Chinese support for Iran—direct or indirect—would be unacceptable to the United States. Trump's ambassador to Beijing, David Perdue, told CNBC that Trump had reiterated this position to Xi and said the Chinese leader had assured him that Beijing was not providing such assistance. When pressed on Fox News about whether China would stop helping Iran, Perdue said simply: "They assured us yesterday they're not doing that."

The warning reflected real concerns. Reports had surfaced that China had supplied Iran with shoulder-fired air-defence missile launchers and had helped Tehran find ways to evade US oil sanctions. The stakes of the conflict itself have only widened since fighting began on February 28 with US and Israeli strikes. Seven months of alternating pauses and renewed strikes have killed thousands, degraded Iran's conventional military capacity, and damaged an economy already under severe strain. Iran and its allies have responded by extending the war throughout the region. Iranian drones and missiles have struck US allies in the Gulf. Houthi fighters in Yemen have targeted Saudi interests. Iranian-aligned militias in Iraq were blamed for a pipeline attack that temporarily removed Saudi oil from the market. The result is a conflict that no longer belongs to any single theater.

Yet even as major powers maneuvered, Iran signaled it would not bend on the issue that has animated US policy for years. A senior Iranian official told Reuters that Tehran would show no flexibility over its nuclear program, even if the United States accepted the peace deal. Iran would grant no concessions on its right to enrich uranium or to ship highly enriched uranium out of the country. Trump has vowed that Iran will never develop nuclear weapons—a position that sits uneasily with any settlement that does not address the nuclear question directly.

The humanitarian toll has become impossible to ignore. The United Nations children's agency reported on September 25 that the violence in Yemen had triggered a new crisis, with acute malnutrition rising among children. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia moved to consolidate its regional position. On the same day that defence officials from Turkey and Pakistan met in Riyadh to review security and discuss military coordination, the foreign ministers of all three countries had gathered within the framework of the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement. The message was clear: as Iran and its allies extended the conflict, Saudi Arabia's partners were moving to shore up the kingdom's defences. The seven-month war, which began as a confrontation between two powers, has become a test of how the world's major players will manage a conflict that touches every critical interest—oil, regional stability, nuclear proliferation, and humanitarian survival.

If the necessary conditions are met, the strait can be reopened, a normal maritime passage restored within seven days. The choice now rests with the United States.
— Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi
We are having positive and constructive discussions through the mediators, and we continue to discuss the nuclear issues.
— US official (anonymous)
Contact Us FAQ