In the long arc of great-power rivalry, the United States and China paused in Beijing to lower their tariff shields on select goods, signaling that even the deepest economic antagonisms can yield, however briefly, to the logic of mutual interest. Presidents Trump and Xi emerged from two days of talks with a framework more symbolic than surgical — agriculture, aircraft, and the machinery of new trade boards pointing toward negotiation rather than resolution. The agreement is less a settlement than an invitation: both nations have agreed, for now, to keep talking, leaving the harder arithmetic o
Trump-Xi summit produces tariff cuts as US, China agree to expand trade
Both countries can find solutions through dialog and cooperation
Mark
So they announced a deal but didn't actually say what's in it?
Mimi
Essentially, yes. The tariff cuts are real—both sides committed to them—but the specifics are still being worked out by the trade boards they're setting up.
Luke
How real is a deal with no numbers attached? We know thirty billion in non-critical goods might get tariff cuts, but we don't know which goods or by how much.
Mimi
Fair point. What we do know is concrete: China will buy US planes, the US will review its dairy detention policy, and they'll address poultry and beef licensing issues.
Mark
Why did Trump say tariffs didn't come up if they're cutting them?
Mimi
He said they didn't discuss tariffs in the meetings themselves—but the agreement to cut them came out of the broader negotiation. It's a bit of a parsing.
Luke
Or it's a signal that Trump wanted to downplay tariff talk while still claiming a win. We can't know his intent from the reporting.
Mark
What's the risk here?
Mimi
Bloomberg says if the US reimposed reciprocal tariffs, China could face a ten percent increase overall, which could trigger retaliation and undo the whole thing.
Luke
That's Bloomberg's analysis, not confirmed fact. The actual tariff landscape depends on what gets negotiated in those boards.
Mark
So we're waiting to see if this holds?
Mimi
Yes. The framework is there. Whether it becomes real trade relief depends on what happens in the coming weeks.
O Pulso
- A summit that Trump said never touched tariffs somehow produced a tariff agreement — the gap between what leaders say and what diplomats sign is itself a measure of the tension.
- China's Commerce Ministry announced real commitments — aircraft purchases, agricultural concessions, a review of border detention policies — but released almost no numbers, leaving markets to fill the silence with speculation.
- Two trade and investment boards are being stood up to negotiate at least $30 billion in non-critical goods, a structural attempt to move friction from the headlines into the machinery of bureaucracy.
- Bloomberg Economics warns that if the US reinstates reciprocal tariff rates, China's overall burden could rise by roughly 10%, a figure large enough to trigger retaliation and erase the summit's goodwill.
- The deal is landing as a fragile opening — real enough to announce, incomplete enough to unravel — with the hardest questions deferred to negotiators who have not yet met.
In the long arc of great-power rivalry, the United States and China paused in Beijing to lower their tariff shields on select goods, signaling that even the deepest economic antagonisms can yield, however briefly, to the logic of mutual interest. Presidents Trump and Xi emerged from two days of talks with a framework more symbolic than surgical — agriculture, aircraft, and the machinery of new trade boards pointing toward negotiation rather than resolution. The agreement is less a settlement than an invitation: both nations have agreed, for now, to keep talking, leaving the harder arithmetic of tariffs and retaliation to boards not yet convened.
Donald Trump and Xi Jinping spent two days in Beijing in mid-May, and when they rose from the table, both governments announced they would cut tariffs on select goods and expand bilateral trade, with agriculture named as a particular focus. The statement from China's Commerce Ministry was notably thin on specifics — the details of what would be reduced, and by how much, were still being negotiated.
Trump had told reporters the day before that tariffs hadn't even come up in his conversations with Xi. Yet the agreement was real enough to announce. Both countries committed to establishing boards of investment and trade to work through the remaining questions, with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer confirming that one board would focus on reducing tariffs on at least $30 billion in non-critical goods.
China pledged to purchase American aircraft — without specifying numbers or models — and Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg and GE Aerospace's Larry Culp both traveled to Beijing and met with Chinese state officials. On agriculture, China agreed to address US concerns about import licenses for beef plants and poultry shipments, while the US said it would review its automatic detention policy on Chinese dairy and aquatic products, a long-standing friction point tied to melamine contamination and unapproved seafood additives.
China also raised smaller but symbolically significant asks: easing restrictions on potted plant exports and gaining US recognition that Shandong province is free of avian influenza. The Commerce Ministry framed the entire summit as proof that dialogue produces results.
The groundwork had been laid weeks earlier during trade talks in South Korea. But the destination remained unclear. Bloomberg Economics warned that if the US reimposed reciprocal tariff rates, China's overall tariff burden could rise by roughly 10% — enough, analysts suggested, to prompt retaliation and undo whatever trust the summit had built. For now, the two countries had agreed to keep talking. What they would actually agree to remained an open question.
Donald Trump and Xi Jinping sat down in Beijing for two days in mid-May, and when they left the table, both countries had agreed to cut tariffs on certain goods. The announcement came Saturday from China's Commerce Ministry, which said the two sides would adopt measures to lower levies on select products and expand bilateral trade, with agriculture named as a particular focus. The statement was notably thin on specifics. Both teams, the ministry said, were still negotiating the details of what would actually come off the shelves and by how much.
Trump had told reporters on Friday, before the formal announcement, that tariffs hadn't even come up in his conversations with Xi. "They're paying substantial tariffs, but we didn't discuss," he said from Air Force One. Yet the agreement to cut them was real enough—or at least real enough to announce. The two countries committed to establishing boards of investment and trade to hash out the remaining questions. According to Jamieson Greer, the US Trade Representative, one of these boards would focus on reducing tariffs on at least thirty billion dollars' worth of non-critical goods.
China made a concrete commitment to purchase American aircraft, though the ministry released no numbers or specifications about which planes or how many. Two executives traveled with Trump to Beijing to make the case: Larry Culp, who runs GE Aerospace, and Kelly Ortberg, the chief executive of Boeing. Both met with Chinese state officials during the summit. On the agricultural side, China said it would address American concerns about import licenses for beef plants and issues surrounding poultry shipments from certain US states. The US, in turn, agreed to look into China's complaints about the automatic detention of dairy and aquatic products at the border—a policy the FDA currently enforces because of melamine contamination in dairy and unapproved drugs in some seafood. Unless importers can prove their shipments are safe, the products get turned away.
China also raised concerns about export restrictions on potted plants and asked the US to recognize Shandong province as free of highly pathogenic avian influenza. These were not small asks. They represented the kinds of trade friction that had accumulated over years of tension between the two economies.
The Commerce Ministry framed the agreement as proof that dialogue works. "Both countries can find solutions to the problems through dialog and cooperation," the statement said. The groundwork for these discussions had actually been laid weeks earlier, during trade talks in South Korea that preceded the Beijing summit.
But clarity on where tariffs would actually land remained elusive. Bloomberg Economics warned in a report that if the US followed through on its stated intention to reimpose reciprocal tariff rates—a policy Trump had championed—China could face an increase of roughly ten percent in its overall tariff burden. That kind of move, Bloomberg suggested, could easily prompt Chinese retaliation, undoing whatever goodwill the summit had generated. For now, the two countries had agreed to talk. What they would actually agree to remained an open question.
Citações Notáveis
They're paying substantial tariffs, but we didn't discuss.— Donald Trump, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One
Both countries can find solutions to the problems through dialog and cooperation.— China's Commerce Ministry statement
Quer a matéria completa?
Leia o original em The Economic Times ↗
Politics & Governance