Five months into a war that has already redrawn the contours of global energy and military commitment, President Trump stood before a crowd in Garden City and declared that the Strait of Hormuz — one of the world's most consequential waterways — would soon become American territory. The statement, whether policy or provocation, arrives at a moment when two nations have locked each other in a naval stalemate over a passage that once carried a fifth of the world's oil, and when the human and economic costs of that standoff are beginning to press against the patience of ordinary life. History has
Trump vows to declare Strait of Hormuz US territory after Iran defeat
USS Abraham Lincoln personnel experiencing difficult living conditions, deteriorating mental health, and reported suicide attempts after nine-month deployment.
no ships get through unless we want them to
Mark
When Trump says he'll declare Hormuz a US territory, is he actually proposing to annex it, or is this more of a rhetorical flex?
Mimi
The reporting suggests even officials weren't sure. It could be either—or neither. What matters is that after five months of war, he's comfortable saying it out loud at a rally, and people are listening.
Mark
Why would Iran close the strait in the first place if it just hurts their own economy?
Mimi
Because it hurts everyone else more. Iran can't win a conventional war, so it weaponizes the one thing it controls—the chokepoint. One-fifth of global oil moves through there. Close it, and you're not just fighting America; you're fighting the world's energy supply.
Mark
But the US blockade is also preventing ships from moving. So who's actually winning that stalemate?
Mimi
Neither side is winning. That's the point. It's a standoff that keeps prices high indefinitely, which helps Trump politically in some ways—he can claim strength—but hurts him in others when people see their heating bills.
Mark
What about the sailors on the Abraham Lincoln? Nine months is a long deployment.
Mimi
It is. And the reports of suicide attempts suggest the human cost is real and accumulating. Trump's response—that it's "not nearly enough"—tells you how he's prioritizing the mission over the people executing it.
Mark
Does anyone actually believe Trump would or could declare Hormuz US territory?
Mimi
Probably not in any legal sense. But the fact that he said it, and that it didn't immediately disqualify him, shows how much the war has shifted what seems possible to say aloud.
Le Pouls
- Trump's declaration that the US will claim the Strait of Hormuz as its own territory after defeating Iran has blurred the line between military campaign and imperial ambition, leaving allies and adversaries alike uncertain whether this is policy or performance.
- Iran's closure of the strait and the US counter-blockade have created a chokepoint stalemate that has driven energy prices sharply higher, with American families absorbing the cost at gas pumps and heating bills every month.
- Trump told Americans to accept paying 'a tiny little bit more' for fuel, framing economic pain as patriotic sacrifice — but rising costs are already shaping the battlefield for November's midterm elections.
- Aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, nine months of continuous deployment have taken a severe toll: sailors are reporting deteriorating mental health and suicide attempts, yet Trump dismissed calls to bring the carrier home, signaling the mission will not shorten.
- Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister flatly rejected Trump's territorial claim, vowing the strait would remain under Iranian authority — ensuring that whatever the statement meant, its consequences will be real and lasting.
Five months into a war that has already redrawn the contours of global energy and military commitment, President Trump stood before a crowd in Garden City and declared that the Strait of Hormuz — one of the world's most consequential waterways — would soon become American territory. The statement, whether policy or provocation, arrives at a moment when two nations have locked each other in a naval stalemate over a passage that once carried a fifth of the world's oil, and when the human and economic costs of that standoff are beginning to press against the patience of ordinary life. History has long known that wars begun with clear objectives rarely end within their original borders — geographic, political, or moral.
At a rally in Garden City, New York, President Trump told the crowd that once Iran is fully defeated, he intends to declare the Strait of Hormuz a territory of the United States. Whether the statement was serious policy or rhetorical flourish remained genuinely unclear — but it landed five months into a war that has already transformed global energy markets and stretched American military resources in ways still difficult to measure.
The conflict began in late February with coordinated US-Israeli strikes aimed at dismantling Iran's nuclear program and reshaping Middle Eastern power. Iran responded with drone and missile attacks on regional allies, and — more damagingly for the world economy — closed the Strait of Hormuz, cutting off roughly one-fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas shipments. The United States answered with its own naval blockade, and the two sides settled into a stalemate over the narrow waterway, each denying the other passage. The result has been a sustained rise in energy prices felt by commuters, families, and businesses across America.
Trump addressed the economic pain directly, urging Americans to accept slightly higher gas prices as the cost of preventing a nuclear-armed Iran. He framed the sacrifice as a service to the world, and claimed the blockade was working without exception. But the financial strain is already expected to dominate the November midterm elections, when voters will render their own judgment on the war's costs and direction.
The human toll surfaced in Trump's remarks as well. Families of sailors aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln — deployed to the Middle East for nine months — had raised alarms about deteriorating mental health and suicide attempts among the crew. Trump dismissed the concern, saying the deployment was 'not nearly enough' and confirming the carrier would be relieved by a comparable vessel. The mission, he made clear, would go on.
Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister rejected Trump's territorial claim outright, insisting the strait would remain under Iranian authority. The exchange underscored how far the conflict has drifted from its original stated objectives — a campaign against a nuclear program that has become, among other things, a contest over who controls one of the most strategically vital passages on earth.
At a police academy rally in Garden City, New York, on Friday, President Donald Trump announced that he would soon declare the Strait of Hormuz a US territory once Iran is fully defeated. "After we finish defeating Iran, which is being very badly defeated — pretty soon I'll be declaring the Hormuz Strait a territory of the United States," he said to the crowd, then added simply: "It's true." Whether he meant the statement as policy or rhetoric remained unclear, five months into a war that has reshaped global energy markets and American military commitments in ways still unfolding.
The conflict began on February 28, when the US and Israel launched coordinated strikes against Iran. The stated objectives were ambitious: to dismantle Iran's nuclear program, to trigger internal unrest that might force regime change, and to reshape the balance of power across the Middle East. Iran's response came swiftly and in multiple forms. The country deployed drones and missiles against American allies throughout the region. More consequentially for the global economy, Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz—the narrow waterway between Iran and Oman through which roughly one-fifth of the world's oil and liquefied natural gas had flowed before the war began. The blockade was both a military tactic and an economic weapon.
The United States answered Iran's closure with its own naval blockade, positioning ships to prevent Iranian vessels from moving through the strait and accessing ports. The two nations settled into a stalemate over this vital chokepoint, each preventing the other from using waters they both claimed authority over. The consequence was immediate and visible at gas pumps across America: energy prices climbed sharply, and they have stayed elevated. Families budgeting for heating oil, commuters filling their tanks, and businesses calculating transportation costs all felt the weight of a distant conflict made tangible through their monthly bills.
Trump addressed this directly during his remarks. He told Americans they would need to "pay a tiny little bit more" for gasoline, framing the cost as a necessary sacrifice to prevent "a very evil country" from acquiring nuclear weapons. "What we're doing is a great service for the world, not only for ourselves," he said, and claimed that the blockade was working perfectly: "no ships get through unless we want them to." The economic pain, in his telling, was a small price for a larger good. Yet the rising fuel costs and the broader economic disruption from the war are expected to become central issues in the November midterm elections, when voters will weigh the administration's handling of both the conflict and its domestic consequences.
Trump also addressed concerns about the USS Abraham Lincoln, an aircraft carrier that has been deployed to the Middle East for nine months. Families of sailors aboard the ship had contacted military media outlets with troubling reports: personnel were struggling with difficult living conditions, experiencing deteriorating mental health, and in some cases attempting suicide. The deployment, they argued, had gone on too long. Trump rejected this assessment entirely. The carrier's time at sea was "not nearly enough," he insisted, and he confirmed that it would be replaced by another vessel "very similar" in capability. The implication was clear: the mission would continue, the sacrifice would continue, and the burden on those carrying it out would be sustained.
Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi dismissed Trump's claim about the Strait of Hormuz with a statement that the country would "not be intimidated" and that the waterway would remain under Iranian control and authority. The declaration of territorial intent, whether serious or not, underscored how far the conflict had already pushed the boundaries of conventional international relations. What had begun as a military campaign against a nuclear program had evolved into a struggle over geography, resources, and the very definition of what territory the United States might claim as its own.
Citations marquantes
After we finish defeating Iran, which is being very badly defeated — pretty soon I'll be declaring the Hormuz Strait a territory of the United States.— President Donald Trump, at a rally in Garden City, New York
The country would not be intimidated and the strategic waterway would remain under Iranian control and authority.— Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi, responding to Trump's claim
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur Deutsche Welle ↗
Politics & Governance