In the long contest between great powers and the resources that sustain them, Donald Trump has named a specific prize: Kharg Island, the Persian Gulf terminal through which nearly all of Iran's oil reaches the world. His threat, issued amid ongoing US-Iran hostilities that have claimed thousands of lives since February, marks a shift from targeting military capacity to targeting economic survival — a move that would reshape not only Iran's future but the architecture of global energy markets. Whether diplomacy, already quietly underway, can forestall that outcome remains the defining question
Trump threatens to seize Iran's Kharg Island, rattling global oil markets
Thousands of people have died, mainly in Iran and Lebanon, since major US and Israeli strikes began on February 28.
My preference would be that. I don't know that America has the stomach for it.
Mark
So Trump is saying he wants to seize an Iranian island. Is that a real military possibility, or is this rhetoric?
Mimi
It's a real threat, which is different. He's explicitly stated it multiple times, including on social media. Whether the US military could actually do it is a separate question, but the intent is clear.
Luke
We should be careful here. Trump said it's his preference, but also said he doesn't know if America has the stomach for it. That's not the same as a declared plan.
Mark
Why does this island matter so much?
Mimi
It handles about 90 percent of Iran's oil exports—roughly 1.5 to 2 million barrels a day before recent disruptions. It's basically Iran's economic lifeline.
Luke
That's the strategic value. But we should note that oil shipments have already faced disruptions from the ongoing conflict. So the island's current capacity isn't the same as its normal capacity.
Mark
What would happen to global oil prices if he actually did this?
Mimi
They'd likely spike significantly. We already saw a 0.5 to 0.7 percent rise just from the threat. Sustained control would give the US enormous leverage over global energy markets.
Luke
True, but we don't know how much of that price movement was from Trump's threat versus other market factors. The reporting attributes it to the threat, but that's one variable among many.
Mark
Is there any chance this actually leads to a negotiated settlement?
Mimi
Interestingly, yes. Iranian sources told Reuters that negotiations have intensified and made progress, even while the military operations continue. One source said the war is a military dead end.
Luke
But that's one Iranian source's assessment. We don't have independent verification of how close any deal actually is, or what the terms might be.
Mark
How many people have died in this conflict?
Mimi
Thousands, mainly in Iran and Lebanon, since February 28 when the major strikes began.
Luke
The reporting says thousands but doesn't give a precise number. That's honest—we may not have exact figures yet—but it's important to note that we're talking about a significant loss of life.
Der Puls
- Trump explicitly named Kharg Island — the artery of Iran's economy — as his preferred military objective, raising the stakes of an already deadly conflict to an entirely new register.
- Oil markets responded within hours: Brent crude climbed toward $94 a barrel as traders absorbed the possibility that 90% of Iran's crude export capacity could fall under American control.
- Thousands have already died since US and Israeli strikes began on February 28, and Trump's promise of 'bigger, more powerful' bombing that same evening signaled no immediate pause in the military campaign.
- Iran's Revolutionary Guard has answered with missile and drone strikes across Gulf facilities in Kuwait, Bahrain, and Jordan, while one Iranian source described the military situation as 'a dead end' for both sides.
- Behind the escalating rhetoric, indirect negotiations between Washington and Tehran have quietly intensified, with both sides reportedly exploring a preliminary peace arrangement after more than three months of war.
In the long contest between great powers and the resources that sustain them, Donald Trump has named a specific prize: Kharg Island, the Persian Gulf terminal through which nearly all of Iran's oil reaches the world. His threat, issued amid ongoing US-Iran hostilities that have claimed thousands of lives since February, marks a shift from targeting military capacity to targeting economic survival — a move that would reshape not only Iran's future but the architecture of global energy markets. Whether diplomacy, already quietly underway, can forestall that outcome remains the defining question of this moment.
Donald Trump declared this week that the United States intends to seize Kharg Island, Iran's principal oil export hub in the Persian Gulf. Despite its modest footprint — roughly a third the size of Manhattan — the island channels approximately 90 percent of Iran's crude exports, historically sending between 1.5 and 2 million barrels daily toward Asian markets, particularly China. Trump framed his ambition in explicitly economic terms, comparing his vision to Washington's approach to Venezuela's energy sector and stating his desire to assume "total control" of Iran's oil and gas operations.
The announcement came alongside warnings of imminent escalation. Speaking on Fox News, Trump promised larger and more powerful bombing campaigns that same evening, while expressing a preference for avoiding civilian infrastructure. Hours later, he reinforced the threat on social media, declaring that Kharg Island and other oil facilities would eventually come under American control. Energy markets responded swiftly, with Brent crude rising to $93.56 a barrel and West Texas Intermediate climbing to $90.68.
The conflict has already extracted an enormous human cost. Thousands have died, predominantly in Iran and Lebanon, since the United States and Israel launched coordinated strikes on February 28. American forces targeted surveillance systems, communications networks, and air defense installations across Iran, while Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps retaliated with missile and drone attacks against US military facilities throughout the Gulf, including the Navy's Fifth Fleet headquarters in Bahrain.
Yet even as the military pressure intensifies, diplomacy has not collapsed. Trump acknowledged that negotiations with Iran were continuing alongside operations, and Iranian and Western officials confirmed to Reuters that indirect talks had accelerated in recent weeks, centered on a possible preliminary peace arrangement. An Iranian source described the military situation plainly: 'This war, from a military standpoint, is a dead end.' Whether that shared exhaustion can translate into a settlement before Trump's stated preference becomes operational policy is now the central uncertainty hanging over the region.
Donald Trump said this week that he wants the United States to eventually seize control of Kharg Island, Iran's primary oil export terminal, while simultaneously warning of imminent and larger military strikes against Tehran. Speaking on Fox News, Trump named the island as his preferred target because of its economic significance to Iran, though he acknowledged uncertainty about whether Americans would accept such an escalation. "My preference has always been – take Kharg Island," he said. "I don't know that America has the stomach for it."
The island sits in the Persian Gulf and functions as the hub of Iran's oil export infrastructure. Despite its modest size—roughly one-third the area of Manhattan—it handles approximately 90 percent of Iran's crude oil exports. Before recent disruptions, between 1.5 and 2 million barrels of Iranian oil moved through the facility daily, making it one of the most strategically valuable energy assets in the Middle East. Most of that oil has historically flowed to Asian markets, particularly China. Trump suggested he wanted to model his approach on how Washington had handled Venezuela's energy sector, eventually assuming direct control over Iran's oil and gas operations.
Trump also announced that larger bombing campaigns would begin that evening. "There will be more bombing tonight. It will be bigger — bigger, more powerful," he said. He indicated a preference for avoiding civilian targets like bridges and power plants, but made clear that military pressure would persist. Hours later, he reinforced the threat on social media, claiming that much of Iran's military capacity had already been destroyed and stating: "At some point in the not too distant future, we will be taking Kharg Island, and other oil infrastructure points, and assume total control of their Oil and Gas Markets."
The market reacted immediately. Brent crude futures rose 46 cents to $93.56 per barrel, a gain of 0.5 percent. West Texas Intermediate crude climbed 65 cents to $90.68, up 0.7 percent. Energy analysts have long viewed Kharg Island as one of the most valuable strategic assets in Iran's possession. Control of it would grant enormous leverage over Iranian energy exports and potentially reshape global oil markets. For Tehran, any sustained disruption to the island threatens serious economic consequences, since oil exports represent a major revenue source for the government.
Despite the military threats, Trump said negotiations with Iran had not ended. He indicated that talks were continuing even as operations proceeded. Iranian sources and Western officials told Reuters that indirect discussions between Washington and Tehran had intensified in recent weeks, focusing on a possible preliminary peace arrangement after more than three months of conflict. One Iranian source said the military situation had reached a stalemate. "This war, from a military standpoint, is a dead end," the source told Reuters. "The Americans could not achieve their goals by attacking Iran. There has been progress in negotiations."
The conflict has already exacted a heavy toll. Thousands of people have died, predominantly in Iran and Lebanon, since the United States and Israel launched major strikes on February 28. The US military said it targeted surveillance systems, communication networks, and air defense facilities across Iran, describing the operations as responses to what American officials characterized as continued Iranian aggression. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps responded with missile and drone attacks against American military targets throughout the Gulf region, including facilities in Kuwait, Bahrain, and Jordan, as well as the US Navy's Fifth Fleet headquarters in Bahrain.
The threat to Kharg Island represents a new dimension in the conflict—one that directly targets Iran's economic lifeline rather than its military infrastructure. If Trump follows through, the consequences would extend far beyond Tehran. Global oil markets, already volatile from months of regional instability, would face unprecedented pressure. The question now is whether negotiations can produce a settlement before Trump's stated preference becomes policy.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
This war, from a military standpoint, is a dead end. The Americans could not achieve their goals by attacking Iran. There has been progress in negotiations.— Iranian source to Reuters
At some point in the not too distant future, we will be taking Kharg Island, and other oil infrastructure points, and assume total control of their Oil and Gas Markets.— Trump, in social media post
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte?
Das Original lesen bei The Financial Express ↗
War & Conflict