In the long contest between the world's two largest economies, a fragile truce has begun to fray. After China moved to restrict exports of rare earth elements — materials woven into the sinew of modern technology and defense — President Trump canceled a planned meeting with Xi Jinping and threatened a new wave of tariffs, signaling that the temporary peace negotiated in Switzerland may not hold. What unfolds next will determine not only the relationship between Washington and Beijing, but the stability of the global supply chains that quietly sustain everyday life.
Trump threatens massive tariffs as China restricts rare earth exports
Mutually assured disruption is no longer a metaphor
So Trump is saying he won't meet Xi in South Korea. Is that the actual story, or is the story the rare earths?
The rare earths are the trigger. China announced new export restrictions on Thursday—requiring special approval for foreign companies to ship them, rejecting military-related requests. That's what prompted Trump to cancel the meeting and threaten massive new tariffs.
But we should be clear: Trump didn't formally cancel. He said there "seems to be no reason" to meet. That's different from a definitive cancellation. And the meeting was supposed to happen at APEC in South Korea at the end of the month.
Why do rare earths matter so much? What are they actually used for?
They're in electronics, computer chips, lasers, jet engines. Basically, if it's advanced technology, it probably needs rare earths. China controls a huge portion of the global supply, which gives them leverage.
And that leverage is exactly why this is happening. China knows the U.S. needs these materials. The timing—right after a ceasefire announcement—is what Trump found suspicious.
Did Trump have evidence that China was trying to upstage him?
No. He said "I wonder if that timing was coincidental?" but offered no actual evidence. That's important to note.
The bigger picture is that they'd already negotiated down from a trade war. Tariffs went from 145% on Chinese goods and 125% on American products down to 30% and 10% respectively. This rare earth move threatens that truce.
So we're back to where we were before the negotiations?
Not necessarily. Analysts disagree on what Trump's threat means. It could be posturing for new talks, or it could be genuine escalation. Nobody knows yet.
Craig Singleton at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies said this could mark the end of the tariff truce. Both sides are reaching for economic weapons simultaneously.
And neither wants to back down?
That's what Singleton said. But we don't actually know what Trump will do next, or how China will respond. The threat is real, but the follow-through is still uncertain.
El Pulso
- China's decision to require special government approval for rare earth exports — materials essential to chips, jet engines, and military systems — struck at the foundation of American technological and defense supply chains.
- Trump responded by canceling his planned meeting with Xi Jinping and threatening a 'massive increase' in tariffs, raising the specter of a return to the near-total trade blockade that paralyzed bilateral commerce earlier this year.
- A tariff truce brokered in Switzerland had brought U.S. rates down from 145% to 30% and Chinese rates from 125% to 10%, but analysts now warn that fragile peace may be unraveling faster than either side anticipated.
- Both nations are simultaneously reaching for economic weapons — new port fees, chip restrictions, agricultural disputes, and rare earth controls — with neither showing willingness to stand down.
- Analysts are divided on whether Trump's threat is a genuine escalation or a negotiating posture, but the window for a return to the table is narrowing, and global supply chains hang in the balance.
In the long contest between the world's two largest economies, a fragile truce has begun to fray. After China moved to restrict exports of rare earth elements — materials woven into the sinew of modern technology and defense — President Trump canceled a planned meeting with Xi Jinping and threatened a new wave of tariffs, signaling that the temporary peace negotiated in Switzerland may not hold. What unfolds next will determine not only the relationship between Washington and Beijing, but the stability of the global supply chains that quietly sustain everyday life.
President Trump announced Friday that he would not travel to South Korea to meet with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, citing what he called Beijing's hostile decision to restrict exports of rare earth elements — metallic materials critical to American electronics, computer chips, jet engines, and military systems. China had imposed new controls requiring foreign companies to seek special government approval before shipping these materials, and said it would reject any export requests tied to military applications.
Trump responded on Truth Social by threatening a 'massive increase' in tariffs on Chinese goods, alongside other unspecified countermeasures. The threat revived memories of the trade war's most destructive phase, when the U.S. had imposed 145% tariffs on Chinese products and China had retaliated with 125% tariffs on American goods — rates so extreme they functioned as near-total blockades on bilateral trade.
Negotiations in Switzerland and the United Kingdom had brought those rates down substantially, creating what analysts called a tariff truce. But the underlying tensions never resolved. Disputes over rare earths, advanced chip exports, Chinese purchases of American soybeans, and new port fees levied by both sides continued to simmer — and China's latest move reopened the wound.
Trump also suggested, without evidence, that Beijing had deliberately timed its export restrictions to overshadow a ceasefire he claimed to have brokered between Israel and Hamas, accusing China of holding the world 'captive' through its dominance of rare earth supply.
Analysts offered competing readings of the moment. Some saw Trump's threat as a negotiating posture, betting that China had overreached. Others were less sanguine. Craig Singleton of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies warned that Trump's posts could mark 'the beginning of the end of the tariff truce,' describing a situation where both nations were reaching for economic weapons simultaneously, with neither willing to step back. 'Mutually assured disruption between the two sides is no longer a metaphor,' he said.
What remained uncertain was whether the coming weeks would bring a return to punishing tariff rates or a path back to negotiation — a question whose answer would shape not just U.S.-China relations, but the stability of global supply chains that depend on both nations' cooperation.
President Trump announced Friday that he would not meet with Chinese leader Xi Jinping during a planned trip to South Korea later in the month, citing what he called China's hostile moves in restricting rare earth exports. The decision came after Beijing announced new controls requiring foreign companies to obtain special approval before shipping rare earth elements—metallic materials essential to American electronics, computer chips, lasers, jet engines, and military systems. China also said it would reject any export requests for technologies used in mining, smelting, or recycling rare earths if those technologies could be used in military applications.
In response, Trump posted on Truth Social that he was considering a "massive increase" in tariffs on Chinese products entering the United States, alongside other unspecified countermeasures still under review. The threat came as the two countries have been locked in an escalating trade dispute that earlier this year spiraled into tariff rates so punishing they effectively froze bilateral commerce. The U.S. had imposed 145% tariffs on Chinese goods while China responded with 125% tariffs on American products—rates so extreme they functioned as near-total trade blockades.
Negotiations in Switzerland and the United Kingdom had brought those rates down substantially: the U.S. tariff fell to 30% and China's to 10%, creating what analysts called a tariff truce. But the underlying tensions never fully resolved. Disagreements persist over American access to rare earths, U.S. restrictions on China's imports of advanced computer chips, Chinese purchases of American soybeans, and port fees both countries have begun levying on each other starting Tuesday. China's latest move on rare earth exports reopened the wound.
Trump characterized the timing as particularly galling, noting it came just as a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas was being announced—a development he claimed credit for brokering. He suggested without evidence that China had deliberately timed its export restrictions to overshadow his diplomatic achievement, posting on social media: "I wonder if that timing was coincidental?" He also said China was "becoming very hostile" and holding the world "captive" through its control of rare earth materials.
Analysts offered competing interpretations of what Trump's threat actually signaled. Cole McFaul, a research fellow at Georgetown University's Center for Security and Emerging Technology, suggested Trump was positioning himself for fresh negotiations, operating from the assumption that China had overreached. From Beijing's perspective, however, the situation looked different. McFaul noted that Chinese officials believed they had successfully extracted concessions in previous talks and felt confident in their ability to manage the Trump administration.
Craig Singleton, senior director of the China program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, warned that Trump's posts could mark "the beginning of the end of the tariff truce" that had brought temporary relief from the trade war's most destructive phases. He described the current moment as one where both nations were simultaneously reaching for economic weapons, with neither side showing willingness to step back. "Mutually assured disruption between the two sides is no longer a metaphor," Singleton said.
The European Union Chamber of Commerce in China noted that Beijing's previous rounds of rare earth export controls had already created a backlog of pending license applications. The new restrictions would only deepen the complexity facing companies trying to source these materials globally. What remained unclear was whether Trump's threat represented genuine escalation or a negotiating tactic—whether the coming weeks would bring a return to the punishing tariff rates of earlier this year or a path back to the negotiating table. The answer would shape not just U.S.-China relations but the stability of global supply chains that depend on both nations' cooperation.
Citas Notables
From Beijing's point of view, they're in a moment where they're feeling a lot of confidence about their ability to handle the Trump administration. Their impression is they've come to the negotiating table and extracted key concessions.— Cole McFaul, Georgetown University's Center for Security and Emerging Technology
The risk is clear: Mutually assured disruption between the two sides is no longer a metaphor. Both sides are reaching for their economic weapons at the same time, and neither seems willing to back down.— Craig Singleton, Foundation for Defense of Democracies