In the shadow of a senator's final work, President Trump signed into law a sweeping bipartisan sanctions package aimed at squeezing Russia's capacity to fund its war in Ukraine, now entering its fifth year. The legislation — bearing the imprint of the late Senator Lindsey Graham, who died months before seeing it enacted — passed with rare cross-party conviction, reflecting a broad national consensus that economic pressure, not diplomacy alone, must answer the ongoing violence. Yet even in this moment of alignment, the law carries within it an unresolved tension: the same tariff powers granted
Trump signs sweeping Russia sanctions bill named for late Sen. Graham
Putin is a thug who understands only force and strength
So this bill was named for Graham—was it something he was pushing for before he died, or did it become his legacy project after?
He was actively working on it. He'd been developing it for more than a year, and he was still engaged right up until his death in July. His sister said he believed it would work by squeezing Putin economically.
But here's the thing—we don't actually know if Graham would have supported the final version Trump signed. The White House resisted it initially, and they only agreed after the bill was amended to include a five-year Iran sanctions extension. That's a significant change.
So Trump got something he wanted in exchange for signing?
That's how it appears. The Iran extension was described as Trump's push, and once it was added, he gave his approval.
Right. And that matters because it means the bill that bears Graham's name isn't exactly the bill Graham spent a year developing. It's the bill Graham's bill became after Trump's conditions were met.
What about the tariff authority? That seems like the part people are most worried about.
The bill lets Trump impose tariffs up to 100 percent on the top five importers of Russian oil and gas. There's an exception for countries importing less than 15 percent of Russia's natural gas and taking steps to reduce that.
But the concern from Democrats like Jeffries is that Trump could use that tariff authority against allies, not just Russia. The bill gives him the power; it doesn't constrain how he uses it.
So the bipartisan vote—86-11 in the Senate, 262-159 in the House—that doesn't mean everyone agreed on what this bill actually does?
No. People voted for it for different reasons. Some saw it as a way to pressure Russia. Others may have seen it as a way to support Ukraine. But the tariff mechanism is where the real disagreement sits.
And that's the forward-looking question: what does Trump do with that power? The bill passed, but the actual impact depends entirely on his choices.
Le Pouls
- Russia's shadow tanker fleet and financial networks have kept Putin's war economy breathing for years, and this law is designed to cut off that oxygen at the source.
- The bill passed with striking bipartisan force — 86-11 in the Senate, 262-159 in the House — a rare display of unity in a fractured legislative era.
- The White House initially pushed back, and the bill only secured Trump's signature after negotiators added a five-year extension of Iran sanctions, a concession that unlocked presidential support.
- House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and other Democrats warned that the expanded tariff authority hands Trump a loaded economic weapon with no clear limits on where it might be aimed.
- The legislation's true test lies ahead: whether Trump wields the new tariff powers narrowly against Russia or uses them as broader leverage in unrelated trade disputes with allies.
In the shadow of a senator's final work, President Trump signed into law a sweeping bipartisan sanctions package aimed at squeezing Russia's capacity to fund its war in Ukraine, now entering its fifth year. The legislation — bearing the imprint of the late Senator Lindsey Graham, who died months before seeing it enacted — passed with rare cross-party conviction, reflecting a broad national consensus that economic pressure, not diplomacy alone, must answer the ongoing violence. Yet even in this moment of alignment, the law carries within it an unresolved tension: the same tariff powers granted to confront Moscow could, in other hands or other moods, be turned toward allies.
President Trump signed a landmark sanctions package into law on Friday, marking the final legislative legacy of Senator Lindsey Graham, who died in July just weeks after returning from a visit to Ukraine. The bill, developed over more than a year alongside Senator Richard Blumenthal, targets Russian officials, financial institutions, and the shadow tanker fleets sustaining Moscow's energy exports — all with the explicit aim of economically strangling Putin's ability to continue his war in Ukraine.
Graham's sister, Darline Graham, appointed to complete his Senate term, released a statement capturing the bittersweet weight of the moment. She expressed her belief that her brother would have been overjoyed, noting he had long argued that squeezing Russia economically was the surest path to forcing a reckoning.
The bill's passage was striking in its breadth. Beyond sanctions on Russian banks and officials, it directs the president to impose tariffs of up to 100 percent on the largest importers of Russian oil and gas — with an exemption carved out for countries actively reducing their Russian energy dependence. It cleared the Senate 86-11 and the House 262-159, margins that reflect genuine cross-party agreement.
The road to Trump's desk was not smooth. The White House resisted early drafts, wary of constraints on presidential flexibility. A negotiated addition — a five-year extension of Iran sanctions — ultimately brought Trump on board. But not everyone was persuaded. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries argued forcefully that granting the president sweeping new tariff authority risked economic harm to American consumers, warning the powers could easily be redirected toward European allies rather than Russian adversaries.
Whether the law achieves its stated purpose remains an open question. The sanctions architecture is formidable, but its real meaning will be written in how Trump chooses to use the authority it grants him — and whether that authority stays trained on Moscow.
President Donald Trump signed a sweeping sanctions package into law on Friday, cementing what will be remembered as the final legislative legacy of the late Senator Lindsey Graham. The bill, drafted alongside Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, targets Russian officials, banks, and the shadow fleet of tankers that have kept Moscow's energy exports flowing despite years of international pressure. Its stated purpose is direct: to starve Vladimir Putin of the economic resources needed to sustain his war in Ukraine, now in its fifth year.
Graham, a South Carolina Republican and longtime Trump ally, had been working on the legislation for more than a year. He died unexpectedly in July, just after returning from a trip to Ukraine. His sister, Darline Graham, who was appointed to complete his Senate term, released a statement Friday expressing what she believed her brother would have felt. "I wish Lindsey were here to celebrate this historic day," she wrote. "Lindsey believed this bill, which he worked on for well over a year, would help end the war through squeezing Putin economically and forcing his customers to reevaluate their relationship with Russia."
The measure arrived at Trump's desk with unusual bipartisan momentum. It passed the Senate 86-11 and the House 262-159—margins that signal broad agreement across party lines on the need to pressure Russia. The bill's architecture is multifaceted. Beyond sanctioning Russian officials and financial institutions, it directs the president to impose tariffs of up to 100 percent on the five largest importers of Russian oil and natural gas. There is a carve-out: countries that import less than 15 percent of Russia's natural gas exports and have taken meaningful steps to reduce those imports are exempt from the tariff requirement.
Senator Blumenthal, speaking after the House passed the bill Wednesday evening, framed the measure as an expression of strength. "Putin is a thug who understands only force and strength, which is what we must show clearly and unequivocally," he said. He also reflected on Graham's absence. "If he were here today, he would be jubilant about our bill's passage—and already thinking about the next one."
The path to Trump's signature was not straightforward. The White House initially resisted the measure, concerned that it would constrain the president's flexibility on sanctions policy. Negotiations continued until the bill was revised to include a five-year extension of existing sanctions on Iran—a priority for Trump. That addition proved sufficient to secure his support.
Not all lawmakers embraced the legislation. A vocal group of Democrats warned that Trump's newly expanded tariff authority could become a tool for imposing additional levies on the European Union and other trading partners, with unpredictable consequences for American consumers. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York was direct in his opposition. "Why in the world would this Congress or the People's House give this president unfettered authority to visit more tariffs on the world that will have an adverse economic impact on the American people?" he asked. "I can't do it." His objection, however, did not slow the bill's passage.
The signing represents a moment of alignment between Trump and the bipartisan consensus on Russia policy—a consensus that Graham spent his final months building. Whether the sanctions regime will achieve its stated goal of pressuring Moscow to reconsider its war effort remains to be seen. The real test will come in how Trump exercises the tariff authority the bill grants him, and whether he uses it primarily as a tool against Russia or as leverage in other economic disputes.
Citations marquantes
I wish Lindsey were here to celebrate this historic day. I know he would be so proud.— Darline Graham, Lindsey Graham's sister
Why in the world would this Congress give this president unfettered authority to visit more tariffs on the world that will have an adverse economic impact on the American people?— House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries