Trump Says Musk Restored Ukraine's Starlink Access as Officials Trade Blame Over Restrictions

Ukrainian military units were reportedly left scrambling when sudden Starlink restrictions disrupted communications during the war with Russia.
"The bottom line, he put it back."
Trump, asked about the reported call to Musk, would not say who phoned whom about Ukraine's Starlink access.
Mark

Starlink is back for Ukraine. Is that the end of it?

Mimi

Not quite. Service returned after the reported call, but connectivity has reportedly stayed spotty. And nobody has settled who restricted it in the first place.

Mark

Trump said he wouldn't say whether he called Musk. What do we actually know?

Luke

Very little firsthand. The call comes from a Wall Street Journal report. Trump declined to confirm or deny it. What he did say is that Musk put it back.

Mark

And who imposed the limits?

Mimi

Three accounts, three answers. Rubio says a private commercial contract governs speeds. Musk says Starshield is controlled by the US government. Trump says it wasn't him and he doesn't think it was Elon.

Luke

Worth noting they can't all be right. Rubio's account points to Musk's company, Musk's points to the military and president. Nothing in the reporting resolves it.

Mark

Why does the origin matter if it's fixed?

Mimi

Because Ukraine's military was scrambling on October 13. If access can be cut suddenly, it can be used as pressure, and that concern is now out in the open.

Luke

Careful, though. That is a concern raised, not something shown. There's no evidence here that anyone used it as leverage on purpose.

Mark

What's the wider backdrop?

Mimi

A strained Trump-Zelenskyy relationship, Trump blaming Kyiv for the war not ending, and criticism of his easing of pressure on Russia, including the diesel purchases.

Luke

And the outcome is still open. We don't know if connectivity stabilises or whether this surfaces in peace talks.

  • Ukrainian units were left scrambling on October 13 when sudden Starlink restrictions cut through the communications their defences depend on.
  • Trump says the service is back, but declines to confirm the reported phone call that supposedly brought it back.
  • Rubio points to a private commercial contract, Musk points to the US military and the president, and the blame ricochets between them.
  • Connectivity remains spotty even after restoration, leaving the question of stability and control open as peace talks loom.

A piece of orbital infrastructure, the satellite network that keeps Ukraine's military talking and its air defences awake, was suddenly thrown into doubt, and in the fog of that disruption a familiar question of power has surfaced: who holds the switch. The President says the service was restored and that the origin of the limits matters less than the outcome, while the Secretary of State and the tech entrepreneur who built the network point toward different hands on the controls. In a war that has already reshaped the arrangements of nations, the dispute reveals how much modern defence now rests on private contracts and public authority tangled together, and how uncertain the lines between them can become.

On Thursday, reporters pressed President Donald Trump about a Wall Street Journal account that he had called Elon Musk and asked him to lift restrictions on Ukraine's Starlink connection. Trump would not confirm the call. "Whether I called or whether somebody else called, doesn't make any difference, I guess," he said. "The bottom line, he put it back."

The service sits at the heart of Ukraine's war effort and its air defences. On October 13, Ukrainian officials said sudden restrictions had left the military scrambling. Service has since returned, though reports say the connection remains unreliable.

What stays unsettled is who imposed the limits. Trump says it was neither him nor Musk. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said speed and access are governed by a private commercial contract, placing the decision with Musk's company. Musk countered that Starshield, the military version, is controlled by the US government and ultimately the president.

The stakes are political. Many worry the technology could become leverage in pressure on Kyiv over peace talks, given Trump's tense relationship with Volodymyr Zelenskyy. As the war grinds on and Washington eases pressure on Russia, the question of who controls Ukraine's connection is now watched closely for what it signals about the path to a settlement.

On Thursday, reporters asked President Donald Trump about a Wall Street Journal account saying he had phoned Elon Musk and told him to lift restrictions on Ukraine's Starlink connection. Trump would not say whether he made the call. "Whether I called or whether somebody else called, doesn't make any difference, I guess," he said. "The bottom line, he put it back."

The service at issue is a satellite internet network that plays a central role in Ukraine's war effort and its air defences. On October 13, Ukrainian officials announced that sudden restrictions on Starlink had left the country's military scrambling. According to the Journal, service returned to normal after the call between the two men. Reports since then say connectivity has remained spotty even though the system is back online.

What remains unsettled is who imposed the limits in the first place. Trump has denied ordering them. Speaking on Friday, he said: "I don't know if it was anybody, but it wasn't me, and I don't think it was Elon." He added that, from what he understood, things were "the same as it's always been."

Secretary of State Marco Rubio pointed in a different direction on Wednesday. Speed and access, he said, are governed by a private commercial contract that sets how the equipment can be used and at what speeds. That places the decision with Musk's company.

Musk rejects that. In a social media post on October 14, he said Starshield, the military-grade version of Starlink, is owned and controlled by the US government. In his words, any limits on speed or usage are decided by the US military and ultimately the president. So the account from the Secretary of State and the account from Musk assign responsibility to different parties, and neither matches Trump's statement that he does not know who was behind it.

The dispute matters because of the political setting. The speed caps and restrictions have raised concerns that Trump, or his right-wing allies, might use the technology as leverage to push Ukraine toward US demands. Trump's relationship with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been contentious, and he has repeatedly called Zelenskyy "difficult" in contrast to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Russia launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022, and the war has ground on slowly since. Europe has backed Ukraine's defence, while Trump has suggested Ukraine bears some blame. In 2025 he cited Ukraine's NATO ambitions, saying he thought that was what caused the war to start. More recently he wrote on Truth Social that Zelenskyy does not want to end the war and probably never did.

Trump has faced criticism from Democrats and some Republicans for easing pressure on Russia. His administration recently issued a series of announcements about buying Russian diesel and easing restrictions on Russia's energy sector. Those moves come as he deals with political fallout from high fuel prices, which followed his decision to join Israel in launching a war on Iran. He has also said he would be open to a trilateral meeting with Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping, which would be a first for the three leaders.

The things to watch now are whether Ukraine's connectivity stabilises, and whether access to Starlink becomes a lever in the US push for a peace deal.

Whether I called or whether somebody else called, doesn't make any difference, I guess. The bottom line, he put it back.
— Donald Trump, to reporters Thursday
Any limits on speed or usage are decided by the US military and ultimately POTUS.
— Elon Musk, social media post, October 14
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en Al Jazeera ↗
Contáctanos FAQ