In the long arc of European security, Tuesday's statement from President Trump marks a significant narrowing of American commitment: U.S. troops will not stand between Ukraine and Russian forces, and two of Ukraine's most cherished war aims — NATO membership and the recovery of Crimea — have been declared impossible by the man currently holding the world's most powerful office. The declaration follows a day of intensive diplomacy at the White House and a recent meeting with Vladimir Putin in Alaska, suggesting that Washington's vision of peace is one Ukraine may find difficult to recognize as
Trump rules out U.S. troops for Ukraine defense, calls NATO bid 'impossible'
Both of those things are impossible, Trump said of NATO and Crimea.
Mark
So Trump is saying no American troops in Ukraine, but only while he's president. What happens after 2029?
Mimi
Exactly. He can't bind a future administration. His assurance is personal to his term, which ends in January 2029. After that, it's up to whoever comes next.
Luke
But we should be clear about what changed. On Monday he didn't rule it out. Tuesday he did. That's a shift, not a reversal of some long-standing position.
Mark
And the NATO and Crimea thing—he's saying those are off the table for Ukraine?
Mimi
That's what he said. He called both "impossible." No NATO membership, no getting Crimea back. Those are the conditions he's laying out for a deal.
Luke
Though we should note: those are Trump's assessments, not necessarily what Putin has formally demanded. Trump is interpreting what he thinks is negotiable based on his Alaska meeting with Putin.
Mark
So Ukraine has to choose between fighting indefinitely or giving up territory and its NATO dream?
Mimi
That's the choice Trump is presenting. He says a deal is possible if Ukraine accepts those terms. He's optimistic about reaching one.
Luke
The reporting doesn't tell us what Zelenskyy said in response, or whether he's willing to accept this framework. We know they talked for hours, but the actual Ukrainian position on these terms isn't in the story.
Mark
That seems like the crucial thing to know.
Mimi
It is. And it's probably still being worked out behind closed doors.
O Pulso
- Trump reversed his own ambiguity within 24 hours, moving from an open door on troop deployment Monday to an explicit 'no' on Tuesday — a whiplash that underscores how unsettled U.S. policy toward Ukraine remains.
- Ukraine's two foundational war aims — reclaiming Crimea and joining NATO — were dismissed in a single sentence as flatly 'impossible,' stripping Kyiv of the negotiating ground it has defended for years.
- Putin's conditions, as relayed by Trump after their Alaska summit, demand Ukrainian military withdrawal from Donetsk and Luhansk and formal cession of Crimea — terms that amount to a significant territorial surrender.
- Trump expressed optimism that a deal is within reach, but only if Ukraine abandons its maximalist goals, framing peace as a transaction that requires Zelenskyy to accept loss as the price of ending the fighting.
- The deepest unresolved tension is structural: any assurance Trump offers expires with his presidency in January 2029, leaving Ukraine's long-term security dependent on European arrangements whose strength remains untested.
In the long arc of European security, Tuesday's statement from President Trump marks a significant narrowing of American commitment: U.S. troops will not stand between Ukraine and Russian forces, and two of Ukraine's most cherished war aims — NATO membership and the recovery of Crimea — have been declared impossible by the man currently holding the world's most powerful office. The declaration follows a day of intensive diplomacy at the White House and a recent meeting with Vladimir Putin in Alaska, suggesting that Washington's vision of peace is one Ukraine may find difficult to recognize as victory. What endures beyond the moment is a deeper question the statement cannot answer: what security, if any, can be promised to a nation when the promise itself expires in January 2029.
President Trump clarified Tuesday what he had left open the day before: American soldiers will not be deployed to defend Ukraine against Russia. The statement came during a Fox News morning interview, offered as his personal assurance — though one with a built-in expiration date, as his presidency concludes in January 2029.
The reversal followed a day of intensive White House diplomacy. On Monday, Trump had met for hours with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders, searching for a path to end Russia's invasion. When asked whether U.S. troops might join a European-led security arrangement for Ukraine, Trump had not ruled it out. Tuesday's interview closed that door.
Also closed, in Trump's telling, are two of Ukraine's central war aims. NATO membership and the recovery of Crimea — seized by Russia in 2014 — are both 'impossible,' he said flatly. These are not peripheral ambitions; they represent the core of what Ukraine has said it is fighting for.
Trump's position appears shaped by his recent summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska. He reported that Putin showed openness to security guarantees for Ukraine, but not ones involving American forces. Putin's terms for any Russian withdrawal center on Ukrainian concessions: pulling troops from Donetsk and Luhansk and accepting formal Russian control over Crimea.
Trump expressed confidence a deal could be reached — but only if Ukraine accepts these conditions. The message to Zelenskyy was clear: peace, as Washington now defines it, requires territorial loss and the surrender of NATO aspirations. What remains unanswered is what meaningful security for Ukraine looks like once Trump's personal assurances run out.
President Trump walked back his ambiguity on Monday with a clearer statement Tuesday: American soldiers will not be deployed to defend Ukraine against Russian forces. Speaking on Fox News Channel's morning program, he offered what he called his personal assurance on the matter, though the weight of that promise carries an expiration date—his presidency ends in January 2029, after which he will have no authority over military decisions.
The reversal came after a day of high-stakes diplomacy at the White House. On Monday, Trump had spent hours in talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders, all aimed at finding a path to end Russia's invasion. When journalists pressed him then about whether American troops might participate in a European-led security arrangement to protect Ukraine's borders, Trump had not closed the door. That ambiguity prompted the follow-up question on Tuesday.
But Trump's clarification on troop deployment was paired with a harder line on Ukraine's broader war aims. In the same interview, he declared that two central Ukrainian objectives are simply unachievable: regaining the Crimean Peninsula, which Russian forces seized in 2014, and joining NATO. "Both of those things are impossible," Trump said flatly. These are not minor aspirations for Ukraine. NATO membership has been a stated goal for years, and the recovery of Crimea represents territory and sovereignty that Ukraine has fought to reclaim.
Trump's assessment appears to align with what he has learned from his recent dealings with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The two met in Alaska the previous week, and Trump reported afterward that Putin seemed open to the idea of security guarantees for Ukraine—though notably, not the kind that would involve American boots on the ground. Instead, Putin's conditions for any withdrawal of Russian forces center on Ukrainian concessions: the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in the east, and formal Russian control over Crimea.
The president expressed optimism that a deal to end the invasion can be struck, but only if Ukraine accepts these terms. He framed the negotiation as one where Ukraine must surrender its maximalist goals in exchange for an end to the fighting. The message to Zelenskyy and European allies was unmistakable: the path to peace, in Trump's view, runs through territorial loss and the abandonment of NATO aspirations.
What remains unresolved is what security guarantees would actually look like without American military involvement. Trump's personal assurance carries weight only during his tenure. A future president could reverse course, leaving Ukraine dependent on European security arrangements alone—a prospect that may explain why Zelenskyy and other leaders sought clarity on this point in the first place. The conversation at the White House was meant to chart a course toward ending the war, but it also exposed the limits of what Trump is willing to commit to beyond his own time in office.
Citações Notáveis
Both of those things are impossible— Trump, on Ukraine's NATO membership and Crimea recovery
You have my assurance, and I'm president— Trump, on his guarantee that U.S. troops won't defend Ukraine
Quer a matéria completa?
Leia o original em New York Daily News ↗
War & Conflict