In the last weeks of a Congress that will soon change hands, the nation's top security officials have asked lawmakers to renew a surveillance authority whose lapse has been quietly tolerated for months. The debate over Section 702 is, at its root, an old argument about how far a state may listen in the name of safety, and whether the trust of its citizens can be kept while that listening continues. Washington now weighs an urgent deadline against the promise of a more skeptical future Congress, and the outcome will shape how much warrantless reach the government retains.
Trump Officials Press Congress to Renew Warrantless Surveillance Law Before Republicans Lose Control
The law expired in June, yet the NSA can still run it until March 2027.
Mark
Why is the administration pushing now, if the program can run until March 2027?
Mimi
The letter says new certification orders take months to obtain and turn into operating instructions, so the renewal process has to start by Dec. 9. They say otherwise there's a gap in intelligence.
Mark
And the other side doesn't buy that?
Mimi
Don Bell of the Project on Government Oversight called the date completely arbitrary. He argues the real fear is a next Congress that adds limits.
Luke
Worth separating those. The administration's timeline is its own account of how long the process takes. Bell's motive claim is his reading of their intent. The reporting doesn't independently verify either.
Mark
What's the core dispute over the law's content?
Mimi
Whether the government should need a judge's permission before deliberately accessing Americans' messages that get swept up. Civil libertarians in both parties want that. Security agencies say it would hamstring the program.
Luke
Again, that effect is the agencies' argument. The article doesn't test it.
Mark
Himes seems to be warning his own side's opponents, too.
Mimi
He told Ratcliffe and Clayton a renewal next year would look radically different, with a stronger warrant requirement. He's expected to chair House Intelligence in January.
Luke
That's his prediction, from an interview. What's actually known is that 60 Senate votes would most likely be needed, and no vote count is reported. Whether this passes in the lame duck is unknown.
Le Pouls
- Three top security officials have pressed Congress to renew Section 702 before a December 9 deadline, warning that any delay risks a dangerous gap in intelligence.
- The law already lapsed in June, yet the NSA can legally continue until March 2027, which lets both sides argue that the clock is either urgent or artificial.
- Privacy advocates in both parties are pushing for judicial approval before agencies search Americans' communications, and some are calling a last-minute attachment to the defense bill a betrayal.
- Passage will likely require 60 Senate votes, and incoming House intelligence leaders have signaled that a renewal next year could bring far stronger warrant requirements.
- The fight is landing in a lame-duck session where the hawks and civil liberties coalitions cut across party lines, leaving the final vote uncertain.
In the last weeks of a Congress that will soon change hands, the nation's top security officials have asked lawmakers to renew a surveillance authority whose lapse has been quietly tolerated for months. The debate over Section 702 is, at its root, an old argument about how far a state may listen in the name of safety, and whether the trust of its citizens can be kept while that listening continues. Washington now weighs an urgent deadline against the promise of a more skeptical future Congress, and the outcome will shape how much warrantless reach the government retains.
On a Friday in November, Attorney General Todd Blanche, Director of National Intelligence Jay Clayton, and CIA Director John Ratcliffe sent a letter to the leaders of both parties in Congress. At President Trump's urging, they asked for an extension of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act within the month. They described the law as the most indispensable tool for detecting terrorist plots, cyber intrusions, and weapons proliferation, and said nothing could replace it.
Section 702 traces back to 2008, when Congress gave legal footing to a warrantless wiretapping program the Bush administration had built in secret after September 11. It allows the government to collect, without a warrant, the messages of foreigners abroad from American companies, even when those foreigners are talking with Americans. That reach is the heart of the controversy.
The law expired in June amid a deadlock over new limits, a contested acting appointment at the intelligence agencies, and a veto threat tied to an unrelated voting measure. Because of how it was written, the NSA can keep operating the program until March 2027, but the officials insist that renewal must begin by December 9 to avoid a gap. Critics called that deadline arbitrary, suspecting the administration simply fears a future Congress.
The path is steep. Most likely 60 Senate votes would be needed, and privacy advocates want judges to approve any deliberate search of Americans' messages. Senator Ron Wyden argued the matter belongs to the next Congress, while Representative Jim Himes warned the administration that a renewal next year would likely look far different. What happens next depends on whether leaders attach an extension to the defense bill before the deadline, and whether enough senators can be found to carry it.
On Friday, three of the Trump administration's top national security officials sent a letter to congressional leaders asking them to extend a warrantless surveillance law within the next month. The signers were Todd Blanche, the attorney general; Jay Clayton, the director of national intelligence; and John Ratcliffe, the C.I.A. director. They wrote that President Trump had urged them to push for an extension of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act now, in the last weeks of a Republican-controlled Congress.
The officials called the law the single most indispensable tool for keeping the country safe. They said it lets the intelligence community detect and disrupt terrorist plots, cyber intrusions and weapons proliferation, and that no other authority can replace it. The letter went to Senator John Thune, the majority leader, and Speaker Mike Johnson, along with their Democratic counterparts, Senator Chuck Schumer and Representative Hakeem Jeffries.
The law has a particular history. Congress enacted Section 702 in 2008 to put a form of the Stellarwind warrantless wiretapping program on legal footing. The Bush administration had created Stellarwind in secret after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Section 702 lets the government obtain, without a warrant, the messages of foreigners abroad from American providers such as AT&T and Google, even when those foreigners are communicating with Americans.
The statute is not currently in force in the ordinary sense. It expired in June amid a congressional impasse. Lawmakers were deadlocked over proposed new limits, over Democratic pushback to Mr. Trump's temporary appointment of Bill Pulte, an inexperienced loyalist, as acting spy chief, and over Mr. Trump's vow to veto any FISA legislation unless Congress first passed an unrelated measure tightening voting restrictions. Because of how the law was written, though, the National Security Agency can legally keep running the program until March 2027, when the annual certification orders from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court lapse.
The officials set Dec. 9 as their deadline. Obtaining a new set of annual certification orders and turning them into operating instructions takes months, they argued, and the government must start the 2027 renewal process by then to prevent a gap in critical intelligence. Don Bell, senior policy counsel at the Project on Government Oversight, called that deadline completely arbitrary. He said the White House and surveillance hawks fear the next Congress will end what he called the administration's blank check for warrantless surveillance.
A bill would face a hard road. Because of the Senate filibuster, 60 votes would most likely be needed to bring a Section 702 bill to the floor, whether on its own or bundled into a larger vehicle such as the annual National Defense Authorization Act. Privacy and civil liberties advocates in both parties want new limits, including a requirement that the government get a judge's permission before deliberately accessing the messages of Americans swept up in the program. A lengthy debate could also eat into time Republicans want for other priorities, such as confirming judges. A coalition of privacy groups released a joint letter Friday urging Congress not to fold an extension into the defense bill at the last minute, calling that a betrayal of the democratic process.
Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat who favors more limits, said the issue should wait for the next Congress, when Democrats will hold control. He called it unconscionable for any Democrat to hand Mr. Trump powerful spying powers right after millions of Americans told Congress to stand up to his abuses, and said there is time to pass real reforms.
The politics do not follow the usual party lines. National-security hawks and centrists in both parties are aligned against an alliance of civil liberties-minded lawmakers from both sides. Representative Jim Himes, a Connecticut Democrat expected to chair the House Intelligence Committee in January, said he warned Mr. Ratcliffe and Mr. Clayton in a classified briefing this week that the administration needed to work with lawmakers in the lame-duck session or face a far more skeptical Congress. A renewal next year would look radically different, he said he told them, likely with a stronger warrant requirement for searching Americans' information in the repository of intercepted communications. Security agencies oppose that, arguing it would hamstring the program.
What to watch is whether leaders try to attach an extension to the defense bill before Dec. 9, and whether 60 senators can be found for it.
Citations marquantes
Section 702 is the single most indispensable tool we have to keep our homeland and the American people safe.— Todd Blanche, Jay Clayton and John Ratcliffe, in a letter to congressional leaders
Don Bell called the Dec. 9 deadline completely arbitrary.— Don Bell, Project on Government Oversight
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur The New York Times ↗