Trump approves execution of Fort Hood shooter Nidal Malik Hasan by firing squad

13 soldiers killed and 32 wounded in the 2009 Fort Hood attack; surviving family members testified about the devastating impact on their families.
I shot to kill, Hasan told the sanity board
Hasan's statement during evaluation after the 2009 Fort Hood attack that left 13 soldiers dead.
Mark

Why did it take so long—nearly seventeen years—to get to this point?

Mimi

The military justice system requires automatic appeals at multiple levels. His case went through the Army courts, then the federal appeals court, then he petitioned the Supreme Court. Each step took time.

Luke

Right, but we should be clear: those appeals were the legal process working as designed. This wasn't delay or obstruction. It was the system.

Mark

What made this case different from other death sentences in the military?

Mimi

The sheer scale of the attack—thirteen killed, thirty-two wounded—and the fact that the victims were unarmed soldiers in a processing facility. The prosecution's case was straightforward.

Luke

But we should note that Hasan's legal team raised procedural objections about the trial itself. The Supreme Court didn't rule on the merits; they just declined to hear it. We don't know what those objections were or how substantial they might have been.

Mark

What happens now?

Mimi

The Army secretary sets the time and place. The execution by firing squad will proceed unless something unexpected happens in the courts.

Luke

And that's the thing—we don't have a date yet. There could still be last-minute legal filings, clemency petitions, or other developments. The approval is given, but the execution itself hasn't happened.

Mark

How rare is a military execution in modern America?

Mimi

The last one was in 1961. That's sixty-five years. President Bush approved one in 2008, but a federal court stopped it. So this would be genuinely historic if it happens.

Luke

Historic in a specific way: it's the first presidential approval to actually result in execution since 1961. That's worth noting as distinct from the approval itself.

  • Thirteen soldiers died and thirty-two were wounded in a 2009 attack carried out by a man who knew his targets would be unarmed and preparing for deployment.
  • For nearly seventeen years, surviving families have lived inside a legal process that moved slowly through courts-martial, military appeals, federal courts, and finally the Supreme Court — which declined to intervene.
  • President Trump's formal approval of execution by firing squad now marks the first time a military death sentence has cleared every institutional barrier and received presidential sign-off in sixty-five years.
  • The Army secretary holds the remaining authority to set the time and place, meaning the execution remains authorized but unscheduled — justice arrived at, but not yet delivered.

Seventeen years after a former Army officer opened fire on unarmed soldiers at Fort Hood — killing thirteen and wounding thirty-two — the long arc of military justice has arrived at its most solemn threshold. President Trump has approved execution by firing squad for Nidal Malik Hasan, the first presidential authorization of a military execution to survive the full appellate process since 1961. The decision, emerging from exhausted appeals and a formal recommendation through the chain of command, places the weight of collective grief, institutional law, and executive power at a single, still-uncertain moment yet to be scheduled.

On the morning of November 5, 2009, Nidal Malik Hasan attended noon prayers, then drove to a soldier readiness facility at Fort Hood knowing it would be crowded with unarmed troops preparing for deployment. He opened fire, shouting "Allahu Akbar," killing thirteen soldiers and wounding thirty-two before being shot and detained by law enforcement.

The legal process that followed stretched across nearly two decades. Hasan was court-martialed in 2013 and sentenced to death after emotional testimony from surviving family members — among them Joleen Cahill, widow of a retired warrant officer who had tried to stop the attack. During a sanity evaluation, Hasan offered a stark summary of his own intent: "I shot to kill."

His sentence moved automatically through military and federal appellate courts. A court upheld the death sentence in early 2025. An appeal to the Supreme Court, raising procedural objections, was declined. With those avenues closed, the path opened for executive action.

President Trump approved execution by firing squad on Monday, acting on a recommendation from Secretary of War Pete Hegseth. It is the first presidential authorization of a military execution under the Uniform Code of Military Justice to survive the full appeals process since Private John Bennett was hanged in 1961. The Army secretary will now determine when and where the sentence will be carried out. No date has been set.

On November 5, 2009, Nidal Malik Hasan, a former Army officer, walked into a soldier readiness processing facility at Fort Hood carrying two firearms. He had attended noon prayers at a mosque that morning, then driven to the administrative building knowing it would be filled with unarmed soldiers preparing for deployment. He opened fire, shouting "Allahu Akbar" as he moved through the crowd. When the shooting stopped, 13 soldiers were dead and 32 others wounded. Hasan was detained after a firefight with law enforcement left him with multiple gunshot wounds.

Nearly seventeen years later, the legal machinery that began grinding in the aftermath of that attack has reached its conclusion. President Trump approved an execution by firing squad for Hasan on Monday, according to Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell, acting on a recommendation from Secretary of War Pete Hegseth. If carried out, the execution will mark the first time a sitting president has successfully authorized a military execution since 1961, when Private John Bennett was hanged after attempting to murder an eleven-year-old girl in Austria. President George W. Bush had approved a military execution in 2008, but a federal court blocked it before it could be carried out.

Hasan was court-martialed four years after the attack and sentenced to death in 2013. The trial included testimony from surviving family members. Joleen Cahill, widow of retired Chief Warrant Officer Michael Cahill, spoke about her husband's effort to stop Hasan and the devastation that followed for her family. The prosecution's case rested on the morning of August 27, 2013, after two days of emotional testimony from widows and parents of those killed.

When asked about his actions during a sanity evaluation, Hasan stated simply: "I shot to kill." He denied experiencing depression, mania, psychosis, anxiety, or cognitive symptoms during the attack. The military justice system required his death sentence to be automatically appealed first to the U.S. Army Criminal Court of Appeals, then to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. A court upheld the death sentence in early 2025. Hasan's legal representation then appealed to the Supreme Court, raising procedural objections about how the trial was conducted, but the Supreme Court declined to review the case.

With those appeals exhausted, the path was clear for executive action. Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the death penalty remains the gravest punishment available in a court-martial, reserved for members of the military. Hasan's execution, if it proceeds, will be the first presidential approval of such a sentence to actually reach execution in sixty-five years. The Army secretary will now determine the time and place for the firing squad execution. No date has been set.

Judgment day for Hasan has finally come
— Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell
I shot to kill
— Nidal Malik Hasan, in sanity board report
Vuoi la storia completa? Leggi l'originale su Fox News ↗
Contattaci Domande frequenti