Trump administration stakes Pentagon claim in Venezuelan oil reserves via private partner

The Pentagon now owns a stake in Venezuelan oil reserves it may never fully control.
The Defense Department's 35% ownership of NABEP raises questions about what Pentagon equity actually means operationally in a foreign country.
Mark

So the Pentagon now owns part of a Venezuelan oil company. How does that even work?

Mimi

The Defense Department gets 35 percent ownership of NABEP, which holds drilling rights to seventeen oil fields. It's structured as a financial stake in a private company, not direct government control.

Luke

But the company is run by a Venezuelan executive, and the fields are in Venezuela. What does Pentagon ownership actually mean operationally?

Mimi

That's the question nobody's answered clearly yet. The State Department also has purchase rights on the oil itself, so there are multiple layers of U.S. involvement.

Mark

And this is supposed to lower gas prices in America?

Mimi

That's the administration's argument. More Venezuelan oil on the market could theoretically increase supply and soften prices. But analysts say it'll take years—maybe a decade—to rebuild the infrastructure and get production up to meaningful volumes.

Luke

Years or a decade is a long time to wait for a campaign promise. And Venezuelan oil is heavy and sulfurous, so it's not a direct substitute for what Americans are used to refining.

Mark

So why do this now?

Mimi

The administration removed Maduro in January and sees an opening. Venezuela has the world's largest proven reserves but has been crippled by underinvestment. This deal is meant to unlock that potential.

Luke

Except critics—including Democrats and Venezuelan opposition figures—are calling it an asset grab. They're questioning whether the Venezuelan government even had the legal authority to make this deal.

Mark

What does Rodriguez say?

Mimi

She's calling it historic, saying it'll bring investment and tax revenue to Venezuela. She insists Venezuela retains control of its resources.

Luke

But if the Pentagon owns 35 percent of the company extracting the oil, and the State Department has first refusal on purchases, how much control does Venezuela actually retain?

  • Pentagon owns 35% of North American Blue Energy Partners
  • NABEP holds 100-year drilling concessions across 17 Venezuelan oil fields containing 65 billion barrels
  • Current production: 200,000 barrels daily; target: over 1 million barrels daily
  • Up to $100 billion in infrastructure investment required
  • U.S. military removed President Nicolás Maduro in January 2026

The Pentagon will own 35% of NABEP, while the State Department gets rights to purchase 20% of output at production cost, securing access to roughly one-fifth of Venezuela's proven reserves. NABEP aims to increase production from 200,000 to over 1 million barrels daily, requiring up to $100 billion in infrastructure investment, though experts warn meaningful price impacts could take years.

The Trump administration announced a deal giving the U.S. Defense Department a 35% stake in North American Blue Energy Partners, which holds 100-year concessions to drill 17 Venezuelan oil fields containing 65 billion barrels of oil.

On Monday, the White House unveiled the mechanics of an ambitious plan to position the United States as a stakeholder in Venezuela's vast oil reserves. At the center of the arrangement sits North American Blue Energy Partners, a private company that has secured drilling rights across seventeen Venezuelan oil fields for the next century.

The scale of what is at stake becomes clear in the numbers. Those seventeen fields hold approximately 65 billion barrels of oil—roughly one-fifth of Venezuela's proven reserves. Under the agreement, the U.S. Defense Department will own 35 percent of NABEP outright. The State Department, separately, gains the right to purchase 20 percent of the company's oil output at production cost, and holds first refusal on everything else. The White House framed the arrangement as costing American taxpayers nothing.

NABEP is run by Venezuelan executive Alejandro Betancourt and currently operates as the country's second-largest private oil producer, extracting more than 200,000 barrels daily. The company has announced plans to dramatically expand that output to over 1 million barrels per day in the near term, with interim Venezuelan President Delcy Rodriguez describing an ultimate target of 1.5 million barrels daily as part of what she called a 25-year arrangement. To reach those figures, NABEP says it will invest up to $100 billion in new infrastructure across Venezuela's oil sector.

The Trump administration has positioned the deal as a cornerstone of energy security. The president has argued it will increase oil flowing to American markets, lower energy prices at the pump, and allow the government to rebuild the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. The White House statement declared the agreement would "secure our energy dominance for the next century." This push into Venezuelan oil production accelerated after the U.S. military removed former President Nicolás Maduro from power in January, creating space for the Trump administration to pursue what it sees as a strategic opportunity in a country that claims the world's largest proven oil reserves but has suffered years of underinvestment and economic collapse.

Yet significant obstacles stand between the announcement and the promised results. Oil industry analysts express skepticism that the deal will meaningfully lower American gas prices anytime soon. Rebuilding Venezuela's energy infrastructure will take years—possibly more than a decade—before new production reaches U.S. markets in volumes large enough to move the needle on prices. Venezuelan crude presents additional complications: it tends to be heavy and high in sulfur content, making it substantially harder to refine than the light, sweet crude typically pumped in the United States.

The arrangement has triggered sharp criticism from multiple directions. Democratic Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island, the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, called the plan to give the Pentagon a financial stake in Venezuelan oil "a blatant abuse of power and taxpayer dollars." He pointed to the sequence of events—the military removal of Maduro, the Trump administration's backing of the unelected leadership that followed, and now the use of U.S. military assets to support a private oil venture—as evidence of a coordinated extraction strategy.

Opposition within Venezuela itself has been vocal. Critics of Rodriguez have labeled the concessions an "asset grab" and questioned whether the Venezuelan government possessed legal authority to hand a foreign military a stake in such a large portion of the nation's oil reserves. Rodriguez has countered that Venezuela retains control over its natural resources and that the deal will attract private investment and generate hundreds of billions in tax revenue for the country.

What remains unresolved is whether the arrangement will survive legal challenge, whether the promised infrastructure investment materializes, and whether the political consensus that enabled it—both in Washington and in Caracas—holds as the years required for production ramp-up unfold.

This deal secures our energy dominance for the next century—all at zero cost to the United States.
— White House statement
A blatant abuse of power and taxpayer dollars. President Trump has been explicit about his desire to extract Venezuela's oil.
— Democratic Senator Jack Reed, ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur CBS News ↗
Nous contacter FAQ