For the first time in thirty years, a federal court designed to operate in the shadows of national security law has been called into the light. The Justice Department's decision to invoke the Alien Terrorist Removal Court against Nazira Haji Zada — an Afghan woman in Fort Worth accused of nurturing her family's loyalty to ISIS — marks not merely a legal first, but a signal that the current administration intends to reach for tools long left on the shelf. When governments awaken dormant instruments of law, the act itself becomes a statement about the era we are entering.
Trump admin invokes 30-year-dormant terror court to deport Afghan woman in ISIS plot case
Family members convicted and imprisoned; alleged plot aimed at mass casualty attack on Election Day voters.
Terrorists have no place in the United States
Mark
So this court has existed for thirty years and never been used. What changed?
Mimi
The Trump administration decided to use it. They had a case—Haji Zada—and they filed the first petition ever. It's a choice to activate it now.
Luke
Right, but we should be clear: we don't know if this is a one-off or the start of a pattern. One case doesn't tell us policy.
Mark
What makes this court different from regular immigration court?
Mimi
It's designed for terrorism cases where classified information is involved. Regular courts can't handle classified evidence the same way. This one can.
Luke
And that matters because it means the defendant may not see all the evidence against them. That's a significant procedural difference.
Mark
What's the actual allegation against Haji Zada herself?
Mimi
The FBI says she supported ISIS, encouraged her children to pledge loyalty to the group, and supported a plot by family members. Her son and son-in-law were convicted of planning an Election Day attack.
Luke
But we should note: the memo says she "supported" the plot. The details of what that support consisted of—we don't have those yet. The classified nature of the proceedings means we may never see them.
Mark
So what happens next?
Mimi
The court holds a hearing Thursday. Then presumably the process moves forward toward a deportation decision.
Luke
And we'll be watching to see if other cases follow through this same court, because that will tell us whether this is genuinely a new policy direction or an isolated case.
Il Polso
- A court created by Congress in 1996 and never once used has now been activated, ending three decades of dormancy with a single deportation petition.
- Haji Zada's son received a fifteen-year prison sentence for his role in a 2024 Election Day terror plot, while her son-in-law pleaded guilty to conspiring to provide material support to ISIS — the family's alleged radicalization forming the core of the government's case against her.
- Prosecutors say the plot was alarmingly concrete: AK-47 rifles ordered, family assets liquidated, and one-way tickets purchased — evidence that intent had moved toward execution.
- The court's unique structure — five federal judges empaneled to handle classified evidence outside ordinary proceedings — means Haji Zada's case may unfold largely beyond public view.
- Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche's framing of the case as a matter of national identity, not just law, suggests this activation is meant to be seen as a precedent, not an exception.
For the first time in thirty years, a federal court designed to operate in the shadows of national security law has been called into the light. The Justice Department's decision to invoke the Alien Terrorist Removal Court against Nazira Haji Zada — an Afghan woman in Fort Worth accused of nurturing her family's loyalty to ISIS — marks not merely a legal first, but a signal that the current administration intends to reach for tools long left on the shelf. When governments awaken dormant instruments of law, the act itself becomes a statement about the era we are entering.
A federal courthouse in Washington opened its doors this week to a court that has never before heard a case. The Alien Terrorist Removal Court, established by Congress in 1996 to handle deportations involving classified evidence, was invoked for the first time to pursue the removal of Nazira Haji Zada, an Afghan woman living in Fort Worth, Texas. Her initial hearing was scheduled for Thursday — the first substantive proceeding in the court's thirty-year existence.
The Justice Department's case centers on Haji Zada's alleged role as the ideological anchor of a family drawn into ISIS sympathy. An FBI memo concluded that she had encouraged her children to pledge loyalty to the terrorist organization. Her son, Abdullah Haji Zada, was sentenced to fifteen years in prison following conviction on charges tied to a 2024 Election Day terror plot and has agreed to accept deportation after serving his sentence. Her son-in-law, Nasir Ahmad Tawhedi — once employed as a security guard at a U.S. military installation in Afghanistan — pleaded guilty to conspiring to provide material support to ISIS. Prosecutors documented that he had ordered AK-47 rifles, liquidated family assets, and bought one-way tickets abroad for his wife and child.
The court itself occupies a singular legal space: five federal judges appointed by the Chief Justice, empowered to weigh evidence that cannot be disclosed in ordinary immigration proceedings. No administration had ever filed a petition there — until now. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche described Haji Zada as the matriarch of an ISIS-sympathizing family and framed the court's activation as a fulfillment of congressional intent. Whether this case remains singular or becomes the first in a series will define how consequential this quiet awakening truly is.
A federal court that has sat unused for three decades opened its doors this week for the first time, activated to pursue the deportation of an Afghan woman accused of supporting a family terror plot aimed at Election Day voters. Nazira Haji Zada, living in Fort Worth, Texas, became the first person ever to face removal proceedings through the Alien Terrorist Removal Court since Congress established it in 1996. An initial hearing was scheduled for Thursday in Washington, D.C., marking the first substantive use of a legal mechanism designed specifically to handle terrorism cases involving classified evidence.
The Justice Department's decision to invoke the court signals a shift in how the administration intends to handle national security deportations. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche framed the move in stark terms, describing Haji Zada as the matriarch of an ISIS-sympathizing family and stating that the case demonstrated terrorists have no place in the country. According to an FBI memo dated July 15, authorities determined that Haji Zada supported the Islamic State and had encouraged her children to pledge their loyalty to the terrorist organization.
The family's alleged plot was not hypothetical. Haji Zada's son, Abdullah Haji Zada, was sentenced in November to fifteen years in prison after conviction in Oklahoma on charges related to a 2024 Election Day terror plot. He has agreed to accept deportation once his sentence is served. Her son-in-law, Nasir Ahmad Tawhedi, who previously worked as a security guard at a U.S. military installation in Afghanistan, pleaded guilty to conspiring to provide material support to ISIS. Prosecutors documented that Tawhedi had taken concrete steps toward executing an attack: he ordered AK-47 rifles, liquidated family assets, and purchased one-way plane tickets to Afghanistan for his wife and child.
The Alien Terrorist Removal Court exists in a legal category of its own. Composed of five federal judges appointed by the Supreme Court's chief justice and drawn from various districts, it was created to handle cases where the government seeks to remove noncitizens classified as alien terrorists under federal immigration law, particularly when the evidence includes classified information that cannot be disclosed in ordinary proceedings. For thirty years, no administration filed a petition. Now, with Haji Zada's case, that dormancy has ended. All proceedings are being held at the E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Courthouse in Washington.
The activation of this court reflects a deliberate choice by the Trump administration to use available legal tools for terrorism-related removals. Blanche's statement emphasized that Congress created the mechanism specifically to remove from the country those deemed to pose terrorist threats. The question now is whether this first use signals a pattern—whether other cases will follow through the same specialized channel, and whether the use of classified evidence procedures will become routine in terrorism deportations under this administration.
Citazioni salienti
The allegations in this case show the matriarch of an ISIS-sympathizing family aiding in a plot to launch a mass casualty attack on American voters on Election Day.— Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche
Congress created the Alien Terrorist Removal Court three decades ago to remove from the United States alien terrorists who never should have been here in the first place.— Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche
Vuoi la storia completa?
Leggi l'originale su Fox News ↗
Politics & Governance