On a Wednesday marked by the approval of the Jackdaw gas field, the Chancellor announced a modest Energy Wealth Fund, seeded with £2bn borrowed from the existing National Wealth Fund, and with it an old British question resurfaced: where did the North Sea money go? Treasury modelling now suggests that the £200bn of receipts, if patiently invested as Norway invested its own, might stand near £1tn today. The story sits between a nation's regret and its hope, a reminder that the choices made during the first flush of a resource boom echo for generations, and that a country can still learn from a
Treasury Models a £1 Trillion 'Lost' North Sea Fund as UK Launches Its First Energy Wealth Fund
After a half-century wait, Britain has an oil fund of its own.
Why does a £1tn number matter if the money was never saved?
Because it's the first time the Treasury has put a figure on the gap. Chancellor John Healey used it to frame the new £2bn Energy Wealth Fund as a correction of sorts.
Worth being clear what the number is. It's internal Treasury modelling, not an audited figure. It assumes £200bn of receipts, no withdrawals, and growth like Norway's.
So it's a best case.
Effectively, yes. And it leans on Norway's returns, which came largely from foreign investments in US big tech.
That's the difference in design. Norway must invest abroad. The UK fund is meant to invest domestically in green energy.
Does that mean weaker returns?
The reporting says it may struggle to match Norway's performance. It doesn't say by how much, and nobody knows yet.
There's also the timing. Norway's fund only began in earnest in 1996, and it started with two billion kroner.
And the revenue side is shrinking. Production is slowing, though Jackdaw and field extensions may ease that. How much is unconfirmed.
What does Norway have that Britain doesn't?
State control of its oil companies, so it also shares in their profits.
Der Puls
- A £1tn ghost haunts the Treasury: modelling suggests North Sea receipts could have become a vast sovereign fund, and the figure lands like a reproach.
- The new £2bn Energy Wealth Fund arrives small and late, carved from the National Wealth Fund, drawing sharp comparisons with Norway's fund worth trillions.
- Ministers are navigating a delicate course, promising to learn the principle of long-term saving without copying Norway's model, and pointing the fund toward domestic green energy.
- The fund is heading into headwinds: falling North Sea output will shrink energy tax income, returns may trail Norway's, and its performance will be the decisive test.
On a Wednesday marked by the approval of the Jackdaw gas field, the Chancellor announced a modest Energy Wealth Fund, seeded with £2bn borrowed from the existing National Wealth Fund, and with it an old British question resurfaced: where did the North Sea money go? Treasury modelling now suggests that the £200bn of receipts, if patiently invested as Norway invested its own, might stand near £1tn today. The story sits between a nation's regret and its hope, a reminder that the choices made during the first flush of a resource boom echo for generations, and that a country can still learn from a fortune it did not keep.
On Wednesday, at the announcement approving the Jackdaw gas field, Chancellor John Healey said Britain would create an Energy Wealth Fund. It is seeded with £2bn taken from the existing National Wealth Fund, and after roughly fifty years of debate, the country has an oil fund of its own, though a small one.
The question behind it is old. Norway has built a $2.4tn fund from the same sea, and Gulf exporters have amassed multi-trillion funds of their own. So where did Britain's go? The same week, national debt passed £3tn for the first time, sharpening the sense of what was not saved.
Healey argued that the proceeds of oil and gas now coming ashore should be invested for future generations. Treasury officials then calculated what the missing fund might be worth: if the historical North Sea receipts of £200bn had been invested, untouched, and grown at a rate comparable to Norway's, the total could be about £1tn today. Officials say the government wants to learn from Norway's principle rather than copy its model, and one insider called the lost opportunity a huge missed national asset.
Critics of the Thatcher era point to pre-election tax cuts that consumed peak oil revenues, while others blame later wasteful spending. Norway's fund, meanwhile, only truly began in 1996, and it has become part of everyday life there, with its value visible to anyone and drawn on gently to support public budgets, including during the pandemic.
Britain's version will work differently. It must be invested at home in green energy rather than abroad, and it may struggle to match Norway's returns, while the tax revenues that feed it are forecast to dwindle as production slows. Nobody expects £2bn to become £2tn. The real test is how it performs, and what it reveals about the decisions that were not made decades ago.
On Wednesday, at the announcement approving the Jackdaw gas field, Chancellor John Healey said the United Kingdom would create an Energy Wealth Fund. It is funded with £2bn taken from the existing National Wealth Fund. After roughly fifty years of debate, Britain has an oil fund of its own, though a small one.
The question hanging over it is an old one in UK economic policy circles. Norway has built a $2.4tn fund from the same North Sea, and several Gulf energy exporters have amassed multi-trillion funds from oil and gas revenues. So where, people have long asked, did Britain's go? The timing sharpens the point: the same week, the national debt reached £3tn for the first time.
Healey argued that the proceeds of oil and gas now coming ashore can be invested for future generations. He added that had this been done when North Sea oil was first discovered, Britain would have a sovereign wealth fund worth probably a trillion pounds.
On Wednesday, Treasury officials calculated for the first time what that missing fund might be worth. The figure comes from internal modelling. It assumes the UK's historical North Sea receipts of £200bn were invested, with no withdrawals, and grew at a rate comparable to Norway's. One insider said Norway shows the power of long-term investment, and that the government wants to learn from the principle rather than copy the model wholesale. The same person called it a missed opportunity, saying that systematic investment of those receipts could have built a huge national asset.
The counterfactual is a familiar one among economists critical of the Thatcher era. In their telling, peak oil revenues were frittered away on pre-election tax cuts, which ended up paying for 1980s garden conservatories. Others argue that later governments squandered the money on wasteful spending. It is also worth noting that Norway's fund only began in earnest in 1996. Supporters of Scottish independence have used the idea of a lost oil fund in their arguments, and some government advisers suggested such a fund in the 1970s.
Norway's fund has become a visible part of national life. The BBC correspondent reporting the story has met some of the officials who run it, and says they are sometimes lambasted by ordinary Norwegians on Oslo commuter trains, since anyone can check the fund's live value. Three percent of its value is drawn down each year, covering a fifth to a quarter of government budgets, and the state drew on it during the coronavirus pandemic. It is meant to help finance a post-oil economy and society, as are some of the Gulf equivalents.
The British version will work differently. Norway's fund must invest abroad and has grown enormously on the back of US big tech holdings. The UK plan is for a fund that can invest domestically in green energy, and the report notes it may struggle to match that performance. Energy tax revenues are also forecast to dwindle as North Sea production slows, although the decline may ease with Jackdaw and extensions to existing fields. And Norway's state still controls its oil companies, which also gives it a share of their profits.
The scale of Norway's growth is stark. Its fund began 30 years ago with an investment of two billion Norwegian kroner, and is now worth over a thousand times that. Nobody expects the £2bn Energy Wealth Fund to become £2tn by 2056. The test ahead is how it performs, and what it shows about what a far-sighted decision decades ago might have produced.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
If we had done this when North Sea oil was first discovered, we'd have a British Sovereign Wealth Fund now worth probably a trillion pounds.— Chancellor John Healey
The government wants to learn from Norway's principle of long-term investment rather than copy its model wholesale.— Treasury insider (paraphrased)