On a November day marking seventy-five years since the Philippines and the United States bound themselves together through a mutual defense pact, a Philippine lawmaker stepped forward to question what that alliance has become. Rep. Antonio Tinio of the ACT Teachers party-list objected to Washington's renamed "Department of War" and warned that a growing American military presence, carried out under the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement, could draw his country into a rivalry with China that he sees as not its own. His challenge reaches beyond one anniversary speech, touching on an older qu
Tinio Assails US 'Department of War' Rhetoric, Warns Philippines Could Be Drawn Into US-China Conflict
A bigger target, not a safer nation.
Mark
Why did a statement about a name get such a strong reaction?
Mimi
Tinio took the ambassador's reference to the "Department of War" as proof of intent. He said the US isn't pretending anymore, and he tied the name to deployments and EDCA sites in the Philippines.
Mark
And the occasion was the 75th anniversary of the Mutual Defense Treaty?
Mimi
Yes. Ambassador Lee Lipton praised Washington's enduring commitment, and Tinio answered point by point, including the exercises and the security assistance.
Luke
Let me separate what's established from what's argued. The statement and the anniversary are on the record. The claim that the Philippines would be dragged into a conflict is Tinio's warning, not a finding.
Mark
What about the line that bases make the country a bigger target?
Luke
Same thing. It's his assessment. The report offers no independent analysis of that risk.
Mimi
Fair, but it shows where the Makabayan bloc stands: they see sovereignty, not security, as the issue.
Mark
He also raised tariffs and economic effects.
Luke
He cited tariff barriers and what he described as harm to workers and communities. No figures are given, so those claims can't be checked from this piece.
Mimi
And the embassy's reply isn't included, so we only hear one side here.
Mark
So what should a reader watch for?
Luke
Whether the debate over EDCA sites moves beyond statements like this one into actual policy or legislative action. That's not in this reporting.
Il Polso
- A lawmaker's sharp rebuke of the US "Department of War" name lands as an open challenge to a celebrated anniversary of the alliance.
- Tinio's warning that each base, missile system and warship makes the Philippines "a bigger target" raises the stakes of EDCA expansion amid US-China tensions.
- He directly contests the ambassador's claims of hundreds of joint exercises, millions in aid and an "equally strong economic partnership," citing tariffs and local hardship.
- He presses old wounds, demanding US accountability for atrocities and recognition of Philippine sovereignty, and calls for an independent foreign policy.
- The debate is sharpening over EDCA sites and the alliance's direction, though no embassy response has yet answered his criticism.
On a November day marking seventy-five years since the Philippines and the United States bound themselves together through a mutual defense pact, a Philippine lawmaker stepped forward to question what that alliance has become. Rep. Antonio Tinio of the ACT Teachers party-list objected to Washington's renamed "Department of War" and warned that a growing American military presence, carried out under the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement, could draw his country into a rivalry with China that he sees as not its own. His challenge reaches beyond one anniversary speech, touching on an older question that Filipinos have long carried: whether a close partnership protects a nation or quietly makes it a stage for someone else's contest.
On Tuesday, November 3, ACT Teachers Party-list Representative Antonio Tinio issued a statement that took aim at the name Washington now uses for its defense establishment, the "Department of War." He argued that the growing American military footprint in the Philippines could pull the country into a conflict with China. Tinio, the House deputy minority leader and a member of the Makabayan bloc, was responding to remarks by US Ambassador Lee Lipton, who had praised the "enduring commitment" between the two nations on the 75th anniversary of their Mutual Defense Treaty.
His sharpest line came in response to the ambassador's wording about the department. "The US is not even pretending anymore," he said, describing a war department sending war personnel and assets into the country and drawing it deeper into a dispute that he insisted was not the Philippines' own. He repeated his long-held objection to US exercises and deployments carried out under the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement, warning that these could turn the Philippines into a launch point for American operations and expose Filipinos to greater danger as relations between Washington and Beijing remain strained.
Tinio also disputed the figures the ambassador had cited, including the hundreds of joint exercises and millions of dollars in security assistance. "These exercises do not defend Filipino sovereignty," he said. He disputed the claim of an equally strong economic partnership as well, pointing to US tariffs on Philippine goods and the harm he said American facilities and economic policies bring to local communities and workers. True friendship, he said, is measured by justice, equality and respect for sovereignty rather than drills and aid.
The anniversary also led him to raise harder questions of history. He asked where American accountability stands for atrocities on Philippine soil, and where recognition of Philippine sovereignty stands given what he described as de facto US control over the country's defense and foreign policy. He invoked American colonial rule, insisting that the milestone should not paper over past abuses or unequal ties.
He closed with a call for an independent foreign policy grounded in standing with the Filipino people, rather than with "war-makers and their allies," and for an end to what he called servility to the "US war machine." His remarks reflect a continuing argument over EDCA sites and the alliance's course. It remains one lawmaker's view, and the reporting includes no response from the embassy.
On Tuesday, Nov. 3, ACT Teachers Party-list Rep. Antonio Tinio put out a statement attacking the name the United States now uses for its defense establishment: the "Department of War." He said Washington's growing military footprint in the Philippines could pull the country into a conflict with China.
Tinio is the House deputy minority leader and a member of the Makabayan bloc. He was reacting to a statement from US Ambassador to the Philippines Lee Lipton, who had praised Washington's "enduring commitment" to the Philippines on the 75th anniversary of the Mutual Defense Treaty between the two countries.
The ambassador's phrasing about the department's name drew Tinio's sharpest line. "The US is not even pretending anymore," he said. He described the arrangement as a war department sending war personnel and war assets into the Philippines, and said it was pulling the country deeper into a US-China conflict that, in his words, is not the Philippines' own.
He repeated a longstanding objection to the US military exercises and deployments in the country, including those carried out under the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement, or EDCA. In his view, they risk turning the Philippines into a staging ground for American operations in the region. He also warned that the spread of EDCA sites across the country could expose Filipinos to greater danger while tensions between Washington and Beijing continue.
Tinio challenged the figures the ambassador had pointed to, namely the hundreds of joint exercises and the millions of dollars in US security assistance. These, he argued, serve American geopolitical interests rather than those of Filipinos. "These exercises do not defend Filipino sovereignty," he said, adding that every base, missile system and warship stationed in the country makes it "a bigger target, not a safer nation."
He also disputed the ambassador's description of the relationship as an "equally strong economic partnership." He cited US tariff barriers on Philippine goods and what he characterized as harmful effects on local communities and workers from American military facilities and US-backed economic policies. Real friendship between nations, he said, should be judged by justice, equality and respect for sovereignty, not by military drills and aid.
The anniversary prompted Tinio to raise questions about history. He asked where US accountability is for atrocities committed on Philippine soil, and where recognition of Philippine sovereignty is amid what he called de facto US control of the country's defense and foreign policy. He also invoked American colonial rule, arguing that the treaty's milestone should not be used to gloss over past atrocities and unequal relations.
He closed by calling for an independent foreign policy, which he said means standing with the Filipino people rather than with "war-makers and their allies." He urged an end to what he called servility to the "US war machine" and a pursuit of peace built on sovereignty and national interest.
The remarks reflect a continuing domestic argument over EDCA sites and the direction of the alliance. The statement is one lawmaker's view, and the reporting includes no response from the embassy to his criticism.
Citazioni salienti
This is a war department deploying war personnel and war assets into our country, and it is dragging the Philippines deeper into a US-China conflict that is not ours.— Rep. Antonio Tinio, ACT Teachers Party-list
An independent foreign policy means standing with the Filipino people, not with war-makers and their allies.— Rep. Antonio Tinio
Vuoi la storia completa?
Leggi l'originale su Manila Bulletin ↗
War & Conflict