'The View' Co-Hosts Back Harris: Democrats Should Skip Impeachment if They Win Congress

Impeachment is moot without the 67 Senate votes needed to convict.
Ana Navarro's argument on The View, four days before the midterms, echoing Kamala Harris.
Mark

Why does a daytime talk show agreeing with Harris matter?

Mimi

It shows the argument forming across the party's media and strategist class days before the election: investigate, legislate, skip impeachment.

Mark

What is the core objection?

Mimi

Arithmetic. Conviction takes 67 Senate votes, and Harris, Navarro and Behar all say those votes aren't there.

Luke

Worth noting that's their assessment. Nobody in the reporting counts the actual Senate. It's a judgment, not a tally.

Mark

What do they want instead?

Mimi

Griffin names repealing tariffs and winding down the Iran war, which she says could draw Republican votes and lower fuel prices. Hostin cites Jeffries' 100-day and 100-hour plans.

Luke

Those plans are described secondhand by Hostin. And Griffin's claim that Republicans would join is a prediction, not something shown here.

Mark

Haines talks about voters feeling abandoned.

Mimi

She says Trump voters are angry over broken promises and that some red states are flipping. That's her read of the moment.

Luke

Right, and the flip claim comes without evidence in this piece. Also, it all assumes Democrats win, which hasn't happened.

Mimi

Navarro said as much: win first, then plan.

  • A voice from the Democratic side has publicly ruled out impeachment, setting off debate about what a newly empowered majority should do first.
  • The View's co-hosts moved quickly to echo the caution, citing the 67-vote Senate threshold as a wall that makes impeachment look moot.
  • Advisers and strategists are steering toward day-one measures like repealing tariffs and easing fuel prices, hoping to show voters results rather than retribution.
  • Warnings are spreading that a focus on revenge could send the party back to the minority, while the question of accountability through investigations remains unsettled.

Four days before a midterm election, a familiar question surfaced on a daytime television table: if Democrats win back Congress, should they try to impeach President Trump? Kamala Harris, speaking on a podcast, said no, citing scarce resources and the absence of the Senate votes that conviction would require, and the co-hosts of The View largely agreed. The moment reflects an old American pattern, in which a party out of power weighs the appeal of holding a president to account against the arithmetic of what can actually be won, and in which the lesson of Nixon's resignation hangs over every such calculation.

On Friday, four days before the midterm elections, the co-hosts of ABC's "The View" played a clip of Kamala Harris and then mostly agreed with her: if Democrats win back Congress, impeaching President Trump should not be the plan. Harris, speaking on a podcast Tuesday, called impeachment "not a good idea." She pointed to limited resources and to the Senate votes that were missing before and, by implication, are missing now.

The hosts offered their own reasons. Sunny Hostin looked to Hakeem Jeffries, who is expected to become speaker, and his 100-day and 100-hour plans, which she said may not include impeachment. Ana Navarro urged Democrats to win first, insisting there are "100 other ways" to hold the administration accountable. Joy Behar recalled Nixon's resignation and concluded that without the votes to convict, impeachment has no point. Sara Haines spoke about voters angry at broken promises, arguing Democrats should investigate but also deliver visible action. Alyssa Farah Griffin named tariffs and the war in Iran as early targets, both tied to fuel prices.

The caution was not confined to the table. James Carville had warned against impeachment earlier this month, and strategist Dan Turrentine said neither the Senate math nor the public supports it, warning that revenge could drive the party back into the minority. The open question is whether a Democratic majority, if it wins, follows this advice and turns its energy toward oversight and legislation.

On Friday, four days before the midterm elections, the co-hosts of ABC's "The View" played a clip of Kamala Harris and then largely agreed with what she said: if Democrats win back Congress, impeaching President Donald Trump should not be the plan.

Harris made the comments Tuesday on "The Parnas Perspective" podcast. She called impeachment "not a good idea," saying Democrats have limited resources and that the energy should go toward accountability and investigations. She also drew on her time in the Senate, noting that the votes were not there in the last go-round and, by implication, are not there now.

Sunny Hostin said she did not think impeachment belonged on the agenda. She pointed to House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries, whom she expects to be the next speaker after November. By her account, Jeffries has a 100-day plan covering tax credits, limits on ICE and restrictions on stock trades, plus a 100-hour plan to undo unpopular Trump policies. She said that plan may not include impeachment.

Ana Navarro argued that Democrats should first make sure they win. She said the focus should be on getting out the vote rather than debating what happens afterward. Even with the House, or both chambers, she said, Trump remains president, so legislation needs his signature or a veto-proof majority, which she called very difficult to reach. She said she is completely against impeachment, adding that there are "100 other ways" to hold the administration accountable, and that impeachment is moot without the 67 Senate votes needed to convict.

Joy Behar raised Richard Nixon, who resigned after Republican lawmakers told him he lacked enough Senate support to avoid conviction. Her conclusion about Trump: if Democrats lack the votes to convict, there is no point in impeaching.

Sara Haines made a political argument. She said many Trump voters are angry that he broke campaign promises, and she cited his remodeling and redecorating and what she called a pursuit of revenge. In her telling, voters were left high and dry, which she said explains why some red states appear to be flipping. Democrats, she said, should do investigations but also show immediate action on the promises they make, bringing policy to votes even if it cannot get past the president.

Alyssa Farah Griffin said a trial and investigation cost a lot of money. She suggested day-one measures a Democratic Congress could pursue that some Republicans might support: repealing Trump's tariffs, which falls under Congress's power of the purse, and trying to wind down or pause the war in Iran. Both, she said, would help bring down fuel prices.

The View was not alone. Earlier this month, veteran Democratic strategist James Carville also cautioned against impeachment if the party takes Congress. Dan Turrentine, a Democratic strategist and co-host of "The Huddle" podcast, told Fox News Digital that neither the Senate arithmetic nor the public is there. He said people are angry about the economy, tariffs, healthcare, the Iran war and corruption, and feel the president is focused on everything but them. He warned that the quickest path back to the minority is a focus on revenge and score settling.

The open question after Tuesday's vote is whether Democrats, if they win, spend their time on oversight and legislation as these voices urge.

Going in the direction of impeachment is not a good idea, because we have limited resources and the energy should go into accountability and investigations.
— Kamala Harris, "The Parnas Perspective"
If we don't have the votes to convict, there's no point in impeaching.
— Joy Behar, "The View"
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei Fox News ↗
Kontakt FAQ