The 'Lazy Buffett' Pitch: Can Alaris Equity Partners Deliver Passive Income?

Buffett's company is now so big it must swallow whole businesses to move the needle
The column contrasts Berkshire's scale with Alaris's minority-stake model.
Mark

Why does this column lean so hard on Buffett?

Mimi

Because the name does the work. The pitch is that you can copy his logic cheaply, by owning a company that invests in other companies and collects steady returns.

Mark

How is Alaris different from Berkshire, according to the piece?

Mimi

Alaris takes minority, non-controlled stakes in small and mid-sized family or founder-run businesses, mostly through preferred equity. Buffett's company buys whole businesses or common equity.

Luke

Worth saying that the comparison is the author's framing. Nothing here shows Alaris actually follows Buffett's method.

Mark

The 13-15 percent return figure sounds attractive. Is that what investors get?

Luke

No. It's a target the column says Alaris aims for. The piece gives no realized results, so it's a goal, not a record.

Mimi

The dividend yield above 6 percent, paid quarterly, is the concrete hook for income seekers.

Mark

And the 117 percent gain?

Mimi

That's measured from March 2020, a low point, and the column admits the stock is flat for the year.

Luke

Exactly. That start date flatters the number. Same for the valuation claim: five times sales and one times book are stated, but there's no comparison to peers.

Mark

So what's missing?

Luke

Evidence the dividend is covered by cash flow, and how the partner businesses are holding up. The column asserts both without showing them.

  • A promotional column urges investors to chase passive income through a single stock, framing simplicity as a path to better returns.
  • Alaris Equity Partners, listed as TSX:AD, is pitched as a Buffett-style holding company that buys preferred stock in family-owned firms.
  • The writer targets a 13 to 15 percent annual return and a dividend yield above 6 percent as the reasons to buy.
  • The shares are up 117 percent since March 2020 yet flat for 2021, and the author dismisses that stall as no real obstacle.
  • Every claim about dividend durability and valuation remains the author's own assertion, so readers are urged to check the company's filings before acting.

On the eve of a late-summer week in 2021, a Canadian investment column asked a quiet question that has echoed through markets for generations: whether a sensible investor needs complicated machinery to earn a steady income, or whether patience and simplicity will do. Drawing on Warren Buffett's long-held skepticism of needless complexity, the piece offered Alaris Equity Partners on the Toronto Stock Exchange as a modest model of that idea, a firm that invests in family-owned North American businesses without seizing their control. Its promise rests on a 6 percent dividend and on the hope that the old wisdom still holds in a new decade. Whether that hope proves well founded is a matter the reader must still weigh for themselves.

A Motley Fool Canada column published in mid-August 2021 made a simple pitch built on one of Warren Buffett's best-known ideas: that complexity does not earn a premium. For investors seeking passive income, the writer argued, the most straightforward route is often the wisest, and the example offered was Alaris Equity Partners, traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange as AD.

The column presents Alaris as a kind of holding company, a business that invests in others to draw a steady return. Where Buffett's vehicle often buys whole companies or common shares, Alaris buys preferred stock in small and mid-sized firms, most of them family-owned or founder-led across North America. It supplies capital for growth while leaving owners in control, and it targets annual returns of 13 to 15 percent on those positions.

The centerpiece of the argument is the dividend. The column cites a yield above 6 percent, paid quarterly, and describes Alaris as an established payer whose income rests on predictable cash from its partner businesses. It also notes that the stock has gained 117 percent since March 2020 while remaining flat so far in 2021, a stall the writer treats as no barrier to buying. Shares are described as trading near five times sales and one times book value, which the author calls relatively undervalued.

The piece closes by returning to Buffett, noting that Berkshire Hathaway's size now forces it toward buying entire companies, while Alaris can take minority stakes and leave control with founders. Its preferred positions, the writer contends, produce the recurring cash that justifies a "lazy Buffett" approach.

The column is openly promotional, and its claims on dividend durability, return targets, and valuation are the author's assertions rather than independent analysis. Anyone weighing the idea would be wise to examine the company's own filings on payout coverage and the health of its partner businesses first.

A Motley Fool Canada column published on August 15, 2021 makes a pitch built around a single Warren Buffett idea: that complexity earns no premium. Its argument is that investors who want passive income do not need an elaborate or stressful strategy, and that the simplest route is often the best one. The stock it offers as the example is Alaris Equity Partners, listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the ticker AD.

The column frames Alaris as a kind of holding company. Holding companies invest in other businesses to draw a steady return from them. Buffett's vehicle buys whole companies or common equity, the piece notes, while some holding companies buy preferred stock, which carries a fixed-return element. Alaris belongs to the second group. It targets family-owned or founder-controlled small and mid-sized businesses across North America and supplies capital for expansion without asking the owners to give up control. According to the column, Alaris aims for annual returns of 13 to 15 percent on these investments.

The piece describes the business as exposure to asset management, with a focus on buyouts, growth capital, and mature investments. When lower-middle-market companies approach Alaris to recapitalize their equity, the company takes a non-controlled preferred equity position. The column says these investments have produced financial benefits and solid free cash flow, and that this cash flow has supported what it calls a massive dividend.

On the share price, the column reports that the stock is up 117 percent since March of 2020, though it is flat for 2021 so far. It presents that flat stretch as no obstacle, arguing the stock remains well suited to investors seeking passive income.

The dividend is the center of the case. The column cites a yield above 6 percent, paid quarterly, and calls Alaris an established dividend name whose payouts rest on predictable revenue streams from its partner businesses. It says the company has grown cash flow per share both organically and through new investments. On valuation, it states the shares trade at about five times sales and about one times book value, and describes them as relatively undervalued.

The closing section returns to Buffett. His wealth, the column says, was built on buying excellent businesses with large cash flows, but Berkshire Hathaway is now so large that it must absorb entire companies to make a difference. Alaris, by contrast, takes minority stakes and leaves control with founders. Its preference for preferred stock, the writer argues, secures recurring and stable cash flow, and that is why the shares have done well over the past year.

The column concludes that strong cash flow and the 6 percent yield make Alaris the right stock for a "lazy Buffett" approach. It is an opinion piece with a clear promotional bent, and its claims about dividend durability, the 13 to 15 percent return target, and valuation are the author's assertions rather than independent analysis. A reader weighing the idea would want to check the company's own filings on payout coverage and on the health of its partner businesses before acting.

Buffett once said there is no premium for complexity, so the easiest option is often the best way to build passive income.
— The Motley Fool Canada column, paraphrasing Warren Buffett
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei The Motley Fool Canada ↗
Kontakt FAQ