Tech giants' $500B AI borrowing spree rattles global markets

trouble with its debt could trigger contagion across AI finance
Oracle's mounting debt and shrinking cash reserves raise fears of a domino effect through the entire sector.
Mark

Why does it matter that tech companies are borrowing so much? Couldn't they just use their own cash?

Mimi

They could, but the scale of what they're building is staggering. A single data center can cost billions. Even Apple or Microsoft can't fund this alone without gutting their balance sheets, so they borrow. The problem is everyone is borrowing at once.

Luke

But wait—how much of that $500 billion is actually new debt versus refinancing old debt? The story doesn't say.

Mimi

Fair point. We know it's from nine months in 2024, and it's described as "from next to nothing" before that. So it's genuinely new borrowing, not just rolling over old loans.

Mark

And this is crowding out government bonds?

Mimi

Exactly. An investor has a choice: lend to Microsoft at 6 percent or lend to the US government at 5.3 percent. More investors are picking Microsoft. That forces the government to offer higher rates to compete.

Luke

But is that actually causing the Treasury yield to rise, or is it just one factor among many? The story mentions inflation and the Iran war too.

Mimi

It's one factor among several. The story attributes the rise to both inflation and the AI borrowing. We can't isolate exactly how much each contributes.

Mark

What happens if the AI boom slows down?

Mimi

Then companies stop borrowing, investors get nervous about whether these firms can service their debt, and you could see a sharp market correction. Oracle is the canary in the coal mine—if they can't pay, it could spread.

Luke

How likely is that actually? Is there evidence the boom is slowing, or is this just theoretical risk?

Mimi

The July Nasdaq drop suggests some skepticism emerged, but the borrowing continued. It's a real risk the Bank of England flagged, but it's not inevitable.

Mark

So we're in a waiting period.

Mimi

Yes. The system is stable as long as AI companies keep growing and can service their debt. The moment that breaks, the whole structure becomes fragile.

  • Tech firms have borrowed $500 billion in nine months — a pace Goldman Sachs projects will reach $1.2 trillion by 2027 — dwarfing even the railroad and internet booms of prior eras.
  • As investors chase higher-yielding tech debt, capital is draining from US Treasury bonds, pushing 10-year yields above 5.3 percent, the highest since 2002, and raising borrowing costs for governments, homeowners, and businesses worldwide.
  • The Bank of England has formally warned that a sharper market correction remains a live risk, and a single July bout of AI skepticism was enough to send the Nasdaq down nearly 7 percent — a glimpse of what broader contagion could look like.
  • Oracle, carrying $125 billion in debt with shrinking cash reserves and a major data center project facing delays, has emerged as the sector's most visible fault line — a potential trigger for cascading defaults across AI finance.

In the span of a single year, the world's largest technology companies have borrowed at a scale that rivals the great infrastructure booms of history, reshaping the architecture of global finance in the process. Nearly half a trillion dollars raised for artificial intelligence infrastructure has begun crowding out the sovereign debt that underpins the global economy, pushing US Treasury yields to heights unseen in a generation. The question now is whether this wager on AI's transformative promise is a rational bet on the future or a familiar overreach — the kind that markets, in their long memory, have seen before.

From virtually nothing at the start of 2024, the world's largest technology companies have raised approximately $500 billion in debt over nine months to build the chips, servers, and data centers that artificial intelligence demands. Goldman Sachs projects the total will reach $1.2 trillion by 2027 — a trajectory that, adjusted for inflation, would exceed what cable operators spent building the internet or what railroad companies spent expanding across 19th-century America.

The borrowing is reshaping global finance in ways that extend far beyond Silicon Valley. Meta now pays more than 7 percent annually on its debt; riskier cloud specialists have crossed above 9 percent. But the deeper disruption lies in what this capital chase is doing to US Treasury bonds. Investors who might otherwise have bought government securities are instead buying Microsoft or Meta debt, and the cumulative effect has pushed the 10-year Treasury yield — the benchmark that sets the tone for mortgages, car loans, and sovereign borrowing worldwide — above 5.3 percent, its highest level since 2002.

Behind the numbers lies a more familiar anxiety: the possibility that the AI boom, like the dot-com surge before it, could hit a wall. A moderate slowdown in construction timelines or revenue growth falling short of expectations could be enough to trigger a shock. The Bank of England's Financial Policy Committee issued a formal warning in late September that a sharper correction remains a live risk, and a brief episode of AI skepticism in July sent the Nasdaq down nearly 7 percent — a preview of what broader contagion might look like.

Oracle has emerged as the sector's most visible fault line. The cloud computing giant carries $125 billion in debt while its cash reserves shrink each quarter, and a major data center project in New Mexico faces possible delays. If Oracle stumbles on its obligations, analysts warn the consequences would not remain contained — they could ripple through an entire industry that has built its expansion on the assumption of continued access to cheap capital. That assumption is now being tested.

The world's largest technology companies have begun borrowing at a scale that has no recent precedent, and the reverberations are already visible in the global financial system. From virtually nothing at the start of 2024, tech firms have raised approximately $500 billion in debt over nine months to pay for the infrastructure that powers artificial intelligence—the chips, servers, and data centers that have become the central obsession of Silicon Valley and Wall Street alike. Goldman Sachs projects this will accelerate to $1.2 trillion by 2027, a trajectory that dwarfs historical comparisons: adjusted for inflation, the AI sector is expected to borrow more in 2026 than cable operators spent building out the entire internet, or than railroad companies spent during the 19th-century expansion of American rail.

What makes this borrowing spree consequential is not merely its size but its effect on the broader financial architecture. Investors, hungry for returns, have been willing to lend to these companies at rates that would have seemed impossible for blue-chip firms just years ago. Meta now pays more than 7 percent annually on its debt; riskier cloud data center specialists have crossed above 9 percent. Yet the real disruption lies elsewhere. As investors chase higher yields from tech companies, they are withdrawing capital from US Treasury bonds—the bedrock of global finance. A bond investor who might otherwise have purchased a government security might instead buy Microsoft debt, explained Mark Malek, chief investment officer at Siebert Financial. That shift, seemingly small at the individual level, has aggregate consequences: it pushes up the interest rates the US government itself must pay to borrow.

The 10-year Treasury yield, the benchmark that sets the tone for mortgages, car loans, and countless other financial instruments worldwide, now sits above 5.3 percent—its highest level since 2002. Multiple forces are at work here. Inflation, driven partly by the war against Iran and elevated energy prices, is one. But the AI borrowing surge is another, and it is happening at precisely the moment when financial markets are already volatile. Hedge funds, which move money far faster than traditional investors like pension funds and insurers, had accumulated an unprecedented 7 percent of all circulating US government bonds by the end of 2025, though that share has since declined. Their presence amplifies market swings.

Behind the numbers lies a deeper anxiety: the possibility that the AI boom, like the dot-com bubble before it, could hit a wall. A moderate slowdown in construction, project delays, or revenue growth that falls short of expectations could trigger a shock across financial markets, Malek warned. The Bank of England's Financial Policy Committee issued a formal warning in late September that "the risk of a sharper correction persists," particularly if concerns about the pace of AI development or adoption undermine earnings forecasts. In July, when some skepticism about the AI boom surfaced, the tech-heavy Nasdaq index fell nearly 7 percent—a preview of what broader contagion might look like.

Oracle has emerged as a potential flashpoint. The cloud computing specialist carries $125 billion in debt while its cash reserves shrink every quarter. A major data center project in New Mexico faces possible delays. If Oracle stumbles on its debt obligations, Malek suggested, the consequences could ripple through the entire AI finance ecosystem. The company's troubles would not remain isolated; they could trigger contagion across an industry that has built its expansion on the assumption of continued access to cheap capital. That assumption is now being tested.

This is not something that we've seen before. AI now accounts for 25% of all corporate bond issuance, up from 4% two years ago.
— Chris Della Fave, senior vice president at Post Oak Group
If Oracle has a problem and can't pay for something, trouble with its debt could trigger contagion across AI finance as a whole.
— Mark Malek, chief investment officer at Siebert Financial
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei The Straits Times ↗
Kontakt FAQ