Five years after the Taliban's return to power, Afghanistan's education system has been not merely neglected but deliberately remade — a transformation that has locked girls out of secondary schools entirely while quietly hollowing out the education boys still nominally receive. What the world witnesses as a crisis of exclusion is also a crisis of content, curriculum, and human capital, unfolding across an entire generation. The distinction matters: this is not a system that collapsed under pressure, but one that was taken apart by design and rebuilt toward a different end.
Taliban's 5-Year Rule Devastates Education for Afghan Girls and Boys Alike
Millions of Afghan children, particularly girls, have been denied access to education, with secondary school enrollment for girls nearly eliminated and boys facing severe educational deprivation.
Education as performance, not as learning
Mark
When we talk about education under the Taliban, why does the focus stay so heavily on girls?
Mimi
Because the ban is absolute and visible. Girls' schools are closed. It's a clear policy, easy to document, easy to be outraged by. Boys' schools still exist on paper.
Mark
But you're saying that existence is almost meaningless?
Mimi
It's worse than meaningless—it's a kind of slow erasure. A closed school is a tragedy everyone can see. A school that's open but gutted, where teachers have fled and the curriculum has been hollowed out, is a tragedy that looks like normalcy from the outside.
Mark
So the boys are still going to school, but they're not actually being educated?
Mimi
Many aren't going at all. But yes—those who do are sitting in classrooms where the substance has been removed. It's education as performance, not as learning.
Mark
What happens to a country when an entire generation grows up like that?
Mimi
You get a population that can't build anything. Can't repair infrastructure, can't run hospitals, can't think through problems. You get economic stagnation that looks permanent because it is.
Mark
Is there any sense that this could be reversed?
Mimi
Not in any timeframe that matters to the children living through it now. This isn't a policy that can be undone with a phone call. This is a generation that will carry the cost of these five years for the rest of their lives.
El Pulso
- Girls have been categorically removed from secondary education, their enrollment reduced to near zero by decree — a visible injustice that has drawn global condemnation.
- Boys remain in classrooms, but those classrooms have been stripped of qualified teachers, adequate resources, and any curriculum not aligned with Taliban ideology — a quieter collapse, but no less complete.
- Teachers have fled the country or left the profession, and the subjects that might prepare young Afghans for economic participation have been replaced with ideological instruction.
- Five years in, this is no longer an acute emergency — it is becoming the only reality millions of Afghan children have ever known, with the generational damage already irreversible for many.
- International attention, focused almost entirely on girls' exclusion, has left the deterioration of boys' education underexamined, even as both crises converge toward the same long-term consequence: a country without the human capital to rebuild itself.
Five years after the Taliban's return to power, Afghanistan's education system has been not merely neglected but deliberately remade — a transformation that has locked girls out of secondary schools entirely while quietly hollowing out the education boys still nominally receive. What the world witnesses as a crisis of exclusion is also a crisis of content, curriculum, and human capital, unfolding across an entire generation. The distinction matters: this is not a system that collapsed under pressure, but one that was taken apart by design and rebuilt toward a different end.
Five years after the Taliban's return, Afghanistan's education system tells two stories — one the world has watched closely, and one it has largely missed.
The first is the systematic exclusion of girls. Secondary schools shuttered, enrollment collapsed, an entire generation of young women locked out of classrooms by decree. The injustice is stark and the numbers confirm it. But while global attention has fixed itself on this visible crisis, a parallel collapse has been unfolding for boys — less publicized, but no less consequential.
Boys still sit in classrooms, but what happens inside those rooms has been fundamentally transformed. Teachers have fled or abandoned the profession. Resources are scarce. The curriculum has been ideologically restructured, hollowed of subjects that might prepare students for anything beyond religious instruction. A boy in school today is not receiving the education his older brother did five years ago — not because the building is closed, but because the purpose of what occurs inside it has changed.
The damage compounds quietly. Without skilled teachers, without a curriculum oriented toward practical knowledge, Afghan boys are losing years they cannot recover — years that might have built the capacity to work, to reason, to imagine alternatives. The harm is less visible than a padlocked school gate, but it may prove equally permanent.
What makes this moment especially grave is that it is no longer a crisis in its early phase. It is becoming the new normal. Children who were in primary school in 2021 are now teenagers who have spent half their adolescence in a collapsed system. Those born around the takeover know nothing else. The generational loss is already embedded.
The consequences extend beyond individual futures. A country cannot develop economically or build functioning institutions without an educated population. Afghanistan is not losing five years of schooling — it is losing the human capital that might have allowed recovery from decades of conflict. Both girls, absent from school entirely, and boys, present in name only, are being shaped toward the same destination: adulthood without the foundational tools that education provides.
This is not a system that failed. It was deliberately dismantled and rebuilt according to a different vision. That distinction is essential — because it means the damage will not resolve on its own. It was chosen, and undoing it will require something equally deliberate.
This Saturday marks five years since the Taliban returned to power in Afghanistan, and the toll on the country's education system has been catastrophic—though the story most people know is only half the picture.
The world has watched, with justified alarm, as the Taliban systematically dismantled girls' education. Secondary schools for girls have been shuttered. Enrollment has collapsed. An entire generation of Afghan girls has been locked out of classrooms, their futures narrowed by decree. The numbers are stark and the injustice is clear. But while international attention has focused almost entirely on girls, something equally devastating has been happening to boys' education—a crisis that receives far less scrutiny, even as it reshapes the country's future just as profoundly.
The collapse of boys' education in Afghanistan tells a different story, but it is no less complete. Schools that once functioned, however imperfectly, now operate without adequate resources. Teachers have fled the country or abandoned the profession, unwilling or unable to work under Taliban rule. The curriculum itself has been hollowed out and refilled with ideological content, stripping away subjects and approaches that don't align with the regime's vision. A boy sitting in a classroom today is receiving an education fundamentally different from what his older brother might have gotten five years ago—not because the school is closed, but because what happens inside it has been transformed.
The practical consequences ripple outward. Without functioning schools, without teachers who are paid or motivated, without a curriculum designed to prepare students for anything beyond religious instruction, Afghan boys are losing years that cannot be recovered. They are not learning the skills that might allow them to work, to build, to contribute to their own families' survival. They are not being educated in ways that might equip them to think critically or imagine alternatives. The damage is quieter than a school closure, but it may be just as permanent.
What makes this moment particularly grave is that it is not temporary. Five years in, this is not a crisis in its acute phase—it is becoming the new normal. Children who were in primary school when the Taliban took over are now teenagers who have spent half their adolescence in a collapsed education system. Those who were infants are growing up knowing nothing else. The generational loss is already baked in. Afghanistan is not simply experiencing an educational emergency; it is experiencing the construction of a new baseline, one in which millions of young people—boys and girls both—will reach adulthood without the foundational knowledge and skills that education provides.
The long-term consequences extend far beyond individual lives. A country cannot develop economically, cannot build functioning institutions, cannot compete regionally or globally, without an educated population. Afghanistan is not just losing five years of schooling; it is losing the human capital that might have allowed it to recover from decades of conflict. The boys who should be learning mathematics and science and history are instead sitting in ideologically restructured classrooms or dropping out entirely. The girls are not in school at all. Both trajectories lead to the same destination: a country with fewer people equipped to do anything except survive.
As the fifth anniversary passes, Afghanistan faces not a crisis that might be resolved with policy changes or international pressure, but a structural collapse that will take generations to repair—if repair is even possible. The education system did not fail; it was deliberately dismantled and rebuilt according to a different vision. Understanding that distinction matters, because it means this is not something that will fix itself. It is something that was chosen, and something that will require equally deliberate action to undo.
Quieres la nota completa?
Lee el original en NPR ↗
General News