More than eighteen months after fleeing Damascus, former Syrian President Bashar Assad has been sentenced to death by a court in his own capital — tried in absentia for crimes against humanity, murder, and torture committed across a twenty-four-year rule and a thirteen-year civil war. The verdict, broadcast live on Syrian state television, establishes Assad as the ultimate decision-maker behind state violence that killed hundreds of thousands and displaced millions. Though Assad remains sheltered in Moscow under Russian asylum, the trial marks the first formal reckoning of Syria's post-Assad e
Syrian court sentences ousted President Assad to death in absentia
The decision-maker who mobilized state institutions to carry them out
Why does a death sentence matter if Assad is sitting safely in Russia?
Because it establishes a legal record. It says officially, in court, what he did and that it was criminal. If circumstances change—if Russia's position shifts, if there's a diplomatic opening—that verdict is already there. It's not nothing.
What about the people who actually lived through this? Does a trial in absentia feel like justice to them?
For some, maybe it's a beginning. For others, it might feel hollow. You're watching the person who ordered your family's torture stand in a cage—that's Atef Najib. But Assad himself? He's watching from Moscow. The satisfaction is incomplete.
Why was Najib so important to arrest?
He was the head of the secret police in Daraa when the whole thing started in 2011. He was there at the beginning, implementing the orders. He's not a figurehead—he's someone who actually did the work. That's why getting him mattered.
Does Russia extraditing Assad seem possible?
Not really. Russia granted him asylum. That's a political statement. Syria can demand all it wants, but Moscow isn't going to hand over someone it just protected. Unless something fundamental shifts in their relationship, Assad stays in Russia.
What happens to the other officials who fled?
They're in the same position as Assad—sentenced in absentia, beyond reach. The new Syrian government can pursue them through Interpol, through diplomatic channels, but without cooperation from the countries harboring them, it's mostly symbolic. Najib is the exception because he stayed.
Il Polso
- A Damascus court has sentenced Bashar Assad to death for premeditated murder, torture, and crimes against humanity — including the intentional killing of children — making him the most prominent figure condemned by Syria's new judicial order.
- Assad's brother Maher and several other senior officials received the same sentence in absentia, while the verdicts carry immediate legal weight for only one man: cousin Atef Najib, who was arrested fleeing Syria and stood trial in person inside a courtroom cage.
- Najib's conviction — for murder, the killing of children under fifteen, and torture resulting in death — represents the rare instance where accountability moved from symbol to consequence, making him the highest-ranking regime official prosecuted in person.
- Syria's transitional government has formally demanded Russia extradite Assad, but Moscow's decision to grant him asylum signals a diplomatic standoff that could leave the death sentence as a moral declaration rather than an enforceable judgment.
- The verdicts land in a country still navigating the wreckage of fifty years of Assad family rule, where justice and ceremony remain difficult to separate — and where the question of whether powerful men will ever truly answer lingers over every proceeding.
More than eighteen months after fleeing Damascus, former Syrian President Bashar Assad has been sentenced to death by a court in his own capital — tried in absentia for crimes against humanity, murder, and torture committed across a twenty-four-year rule and a thirteen-year civil war. The verdict, broadcast live on Syrian state television, establishes Assad as the ultimate decision-maker behind state violence that killed hundreds of thousands and displaced millions. Though Assad remains sheltered in Moscow under Russian asylum, the trial marks the first formal reckoning of Syria's post-Assad era — a society reaching, however imperfectly, toward the ancient human need to name what was done and who did it.
A Syrian court in Damascus sentenced former President Bashar Assad to death on Tuesday, convicting him in absentia of premeditated murder, torture, arbitrary detention, and crimes against humanity — including the intentional killing of children. The Fourth Criminal Court, whose proceedings were broadcast live on Syrian state television, ruled that Assad bore ultimate responsibility for mobilizing state institutions to carry out these acts across his twenty-four-year rule and the thirteen-year civil war that consumed his country.
Assad has been beyond Syria's reach since December 2024, when rebel forces swept through Damascus and he fled with his family to Russia, where the Kremlin granted them asylum. Syria's new government has formally demanded his extradition, but Moscow's protection makes compliance unlikely, leaving the sentence as a historically significant but immediately unenforceable act of reckoning.
Assad's brother Maher and several other former officials were also sentenced to death in absentia. The trial did, however, produce one defendant who could not escape: Atef Najib, Assad's cousin and former head of the Political Security Branch in Daraa — the city where the 2011 uprising first ignited. Arrested in January 2025 while attempting to flee Syria, Najib stood in a courtroom cage in a prison uniform as the judge pronounced his death sentence for murder, the killing of children under fifteen, and torture resulting in death.
Najib's in-person conviction marks the closest Syria's transitional justice has come to direct accountability, a contrast that throws the limits of the other verdicts into sharp relief. Whether the sentences handed down in Damascus will ever reach the men still living under foreign protection remains the defining question of Syria's long, unfinished search for justice.
A Syrian court handed down a death sentence against Bashar Assad on Tuesday, more than eighteen months after the former president fled Damascus as rebel forces swept through the capital in December 2024. Assad, who had ruled Syria for twenty-four years following his father's death in 2000, is now beyond the reach of Syrian justice—he and his family sought asylum in Russia, where the Kremlin granted him refuge as Syria's new authorities began systematically pursuing members of the ousted regime.
The Fourth Criminal Court in Damascus convicted Assad of premeditated and intentional murder affecting multiple victims including children, torture, arbitrary detention, and crimes against humanity. In the judge's formal reading, broadcast live on Syrian state television, the court established that Assad bore ultimate responsibility for these acts—that he was the decision-maker who mobilized state institutions to carry them out. The verdict represents the first major accountability proceeding of the post-Assad era, a symbolic reckoning even if the defendant himself remains in Moscow.
Assad's rule had sustained the Alawite minority's dominance over Syria's Sunni majority while maintaining the country's alliance with Iran and its hostility toward Israel and the United States. His family had held power for more than fifty years before the uprising that began in 2011 spiraled into civil war, a conflict that would ultimately displace millions and kill hundreds of thousands. The new Syrian government has formally demanded that Russia extradite Assad, though Moscow's decision to grant him asylum suggests little likelihood of compliance.
The court also sentenced Assad's brother Maher and several other former government officials to death in absentia, convicting them of premeditated murder and torture resulting in death. But the trial produced one figure who could not escape: Atef Najib, Assad's cousin and a senior security official who had headed the Political Security Branch in Daraa when the 2011 uprising began. Najib was arrested in January 2025 while attempting to flee Syria, making him the highest-ranking official from the old regime to face trial in person.
Najib stood in a cage inside the courtroom, dressed in a prison uniform, as the judge pronounced his death sentence. The court convicted him of murder, the intentional killing of children under fifteen, and torture resulting in death—all classified as crimes against humanity. His trial and conviction marked a rare moment of direct accountability, a contrast to the absent defendants whose sentences, however symbolically significant, carry no immediate legal consequence. The question now facing Syria's transitional authorities is whether any of the regime figures beyond Najib's reach will ever answer for their actions, or whether the sentences handed down in Damascus will remain largely ceremonial gestures toward justice.
Citazioni salienti
The contribution of the criminal Bashar Assad to the crimes was that of the person ultimately responsible for decision-making, mobilizing state institutions to commit them— Judge, Fourth Criminal Court of Damascus