In the autumn of 2026, a Swedish manufacturing company summoned the digital ghost of Greta Garbo—an actress who spent her final decades fleeing the very spotlight now trained upon her once more. SKF Group's AI-generated likeness of the long-deceased star placed commerce and memory in uneasy conversation, asking an old question in a new register: who holds the rights to a life, and for how long? The advertisement arrived not merely as a marketing decision, but as a signal that the boundary between the living and the dead is becoming, in the digital age, increasingly negotiable.
Swedish Firm Creates AI Version of Greta Garbo for Ad Campaign
The dead are made to sell.
Mark
Why does it matter that SKF Group chose Greta Garbo specifically? She's been dead for over thirty years.
Mimi
Because Garbo spent her entire life resisting exactly this kind of thing—being used, being packaged, being made into a commodity. She left Hollywood partly because she couldn't control how her image was being used. To resurrect her digitally for an ad is almost a violation of her stated values.
Luke
But we should be careful here. The article doesn't say what SKF Group's legal basis was, or whether they consulted her estate. We know the ad happened and that people had mixed reactions to it. We don't actually know if they had permission or not.
Mark
So the real question is: who owns a dead person's image?
Mimi
Exactly. And right now, the law is murky. In some places, publicity rights die with the person. In others, they pass to the estate for a limited time. But there's no clear global standard, especially not for AI-generated versions.
Luke
The article also doesn't tell us whether the digital Garbo was convincing or not—it just says viewers were divided. That's important. If the technology had been flawless, this might be a different story.
Mark
You mean if it had been perfect, people might have been more disturbed?
Mimi
Or less disturbed. A perfect recreation might feel like a tribute. An imperfect one feels like a mistake, or worse, like a parody.
Luke
We also don't know what the ad was actually selling, or how the Garbo likeness was used in it. Was she the main focus? A cameo? That context matters for understanding what SKF Group was trying to do.
Mark
So this is really about the technology catching up to the ethics?
Mimi
It's about the technology outpacing the ethics. The capability exists now. The rules haven't caught up. And Garbo's case is just the beginning.
Le Pouls
- A Swedish industrial company has deployed artificial intelligence to resurrect one of cinema's most private icons for a manufacturing commercial—without her consent, which can never now be given.
- Audiences split sharply: some found the synthetic Garbo momentarily convincing, while others felt the reconstruction failed to capture the intangible quality that made her legendary, leaving an unsettling impression instead of an inspiring one.
- The advertisement exposed a legal vacuum—rights of publicity over deceased individuals remain poorly defined across most jurisdictions, leaving estates, families, and the public with little recourse.
- Deeper than legality, the campaign provoked a cultural reckoning: Garbo's mystique was built on refusal to be commodified, making her appearance in an ad for industrial equipment feel like a particular kind of violation.
- The case is now widely regarded as an early benchmark for a coming wave of AI resurrections, forcing the question of where tribute ends and exploitation begins.
In the autumn of 2026, a Swedish manufacturing company summoned the digital ghost of Greta Garbo—an actress who spent her final decades fleeing the very spotlight now trained upon her once more. SKF Group's AI-generated likeness of the long-deceased star placed commerce and memory in uneasy conversation, asking an old question in a new register: who holds the rights to a life, and for how long? The advertisement arrived not merely as a marketing decision, but as a signal that the boundary between the living and the dead is becoming, in the digital age, increasingly negotiable.
SKF Group, a Swedish manufacturing firm, released an advertisement this fall built around a digital recreation of Greta Garbo, the Swedish-American actress who died in 1990 at age 84. The campaign marked a striking moment in the accelerating practice of using artificial intelligence to bring deceased public figures back to commercial life—a practice that occupies a murky legal and ethical space, especially when the subjects can no longer speak for themselves.
Garbo spent the last decades of her life deliberately withdrawing from public view, cultivating a legacy defined as much by absence as by performance. Her estate had historically managed her image with restraint. To see her appear in an advertisement for industrial equipment represented a sharp departure from that careful stewardship.
Reactions were immediate and divided. Some viewers found the digital reconstruction momentarily persuasive; others felt it fell into the uncanny valley—that disquieting space where something almost human registers as deeply wrong. The ineffable quality that made Garbo magnetic on screen proved difficult for the technology to replicate, at least to skeptical eyes.
Beyond aesthetics, the campaign opened larger questions. Legal frameworks governing the posthumous use of a person's likeness remain underdeveloped in most jurisdictions, leaving estates and families with limited tools to respond. And for a figure whose cultural power was rooted in her refusal to be sold, the irony of her digital self endorsing a product carried its own particular weight.
The Garbo advertisement is unlikely to remain an isolated case. As AI-generated likenesses grow cheaper and more convincing, the temptation to borrow the prestige of the famous dead will only intensify. Each instance will demand a fresh reckoning with consent, dignity, and the difference between honoring a legacy and consuming it.
SKF Group, a Swedish manufacturing company, released an advertisement this fall featuring a digital recreation of Greta Garbo, the Swedish-American actress who died in 1990. The ad marked a notable moment in the expanding use of artificial intelligence to resurrect deceased public figures for commercial purposes—a practice that exists in a legal and ethical gray zone, particularly when the subjects cannot consent.
Garbo, one of cinema's most iconic figures, spent decades cultivating an image of mystery and distance from public life. She died at age 84 in New York City, having largely withdrawn from the spotlight decades earlier. The decision to use her likeness in a contemporary manufacturing advertisement represented a significant departure from how her legacy had been managed—carefully, sparingly, and with attention to her own stated wishes about privacy.
The synthetic Garbo generated immediate and divided reactions. Some viewers found the digital reconstruction compelling enough to suspend disbelief, at least momentarily. Others were unconvinced by the replica, finding it fell short of capturing the ineffable quality that made the original actress so arresting on screen. The uncanny valley—that unsettling space between something almost human and something clearly artificial—proved difficult for the technology to bridge, at least in the eyes of skeptical viewers.
The campaign raised questions that extend well beyond advertising aesthetics. When a company can digitally resurrect a deceased person without their consent, who owns that image? What obligations do corporations have to the estates or families of the deceased? And what does it mean for the cultural memory of a figure like Garbo, whose power partly derived from her refusal to be commodified, to suddenly appear in a commercial for industrial equipment?
SKF Group's use of the technology sits at the intersection of several emerging tensions in the digital age. Artificial intelligence has advanced to the point where it can generate convincing likenesses of real people—living and dead. The cost of doing so has dropped significantly. But the legal frameworks governing such use remain underdeveloped. In many jurisdictions, the right of publicity—the legal protection that prevents unauthorized commercial use of a person's image—does not clearly extend to deceased individuals, or extends only for a limited time.
The Garbo advertisement is unlikely to be the last of its kind. As the technology improves and becomes cheaper, more companies will face the temptation to deploy the likenesses of famous deceased figures to lend prestige or emotional weight to their products. Each instance will force a reckoning with questions about consent, dignity, and the line between honoring a legacy and exploiting it. For now, the Swedish actress's digital doppelgänger serves as an early test case—one that revealed both the promise and the uncanniness of the technology, and the deep discomfort many people feel when the dead are made to sell.
Citations marquantes
Garbo spent her entire life resisting being used and packaged as a commodity, making the digital resurrection for commercial purposes a potential violation of her stated values— implicit in the reporting
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur The New York Times ↗
Politics & Governance