Across a quiet stretch of the American nursery, a study of 227 young infants has found that most of them lack a bacterium long regarded as a quiet partner in human development. Bifidobacterium infantis, which helps unlock the nutrients in breast milk and supports the young immune system, was missing in roughly nine of every ten babies sampled. In its place, bacteria that can cause harm, and that often resist antibiotics, dominated the gut. The findings, drawn from five states, point to a pattern that has been building for generations through changes in birth, medicine, and feeding, yet they re
Study Finds Nine in Ten U.S. Infants May Lack Key Gut Bacterium Tied to Breast Milk Digestion and Immunity
Nine in ten infants were missing a bacterium once thought common
So what exactly did the study find?
That about nine in ten of the 227 infants sampled lacked B. infantis, a bacterium that breaks down the sugars in breast milk that babies can't digest themselves.
And what was in the gut instead?
Potentially harmful bacteria averaged 93 percent of the gut bacteria. E. coli, Klebsiella, Salmonella, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus and C. diff were the most common. They also found 325 antibiotic resistance genes, 54 percent of them conferring multi-drug resistance.
Let me slow us down. 227 babies in five states is not the whole country. The headline says nine in ten U.S. infants, but the study can only say that about its sample.
Fair. Does the study say why this is happening?
It points to a century-long decline in Bifidobacteria, with C-sections, antibiotics and formula named as factors in the research. Those are background, not something this sample proved.
Right. And Dr. Sylvester's statement that the dysfunction underpins many childhood ailments is his belief. The reporting doesn't show that link directly here.
What about the 93 percent figure? Does it mean the babies were sick?
Not as far as we're told. The bacteria are described as potentially dangerous, and the infants were outwardly healthy. Whether that translates to illness is not established.
What stands out is that this was off most parents' and pediatricians' radar. Next comes confirming how common it is and what drives it.
Il Polso
- Roughly nine in ten infants sampled were missing a bacterium that helps digest breast milk and shape immunity.
- Potentially harmful bacteria made up about 93 percent of the gut community on average, raising alarm among researchers.
- Hundreds of antibiotic resistance genes were found, with more than half conferring resistance to multiple drugs.
- Scientists are now racing to confirm whether this gap is truly national and to uncover what drives it.
- The study's reach is limited to 227 infants in five states, so its implications are still awaiting broader proof.
Across a quiet stretch of the American nursery, a study of 227 young infants has found that most of them lack a bacterium long regarded as a quiet partner in human development. Bifidobacterium infantis, which helps unlock the nutrients in breast milk and supports the young immune system, was missing in roughly nine of every ten babies sampled. In its place, bacteria that can cause harm, and that often resist antibiotics, dominated the gut. The findings, drawn from five states, point to a pattern that has been building for generations through changes in birth, medicine, and feeding, yet they remain a signal to be confirmed rather than a settled national verdict.
A study published in Scientific Reports has found that about nine out of ten infants in its sample were missing a single gut bacterium: Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis, or B. infantis. Researchers call it the largest effort yet to measure how widespread this gap is among U.S. babies.
The team drew fecal samples from 227 infants under six months old during pediatrician visits in California, Georgia, Oregon, Pennsylvania and South Carolina. They excluded babies with jaundice, those on antibiotics, and those with carbohydrate absorption problems, since such conditions could alter the gut on their own.
B. infantis matters because it breaks down human milk oligosaccharides, complex sugars that infants cannot digest unaided. It is also linked to immune development, protection against harmful bacteria, and lower rates of conditions like colic and diaper rash. Its absence in so many outwardly healthy babies surprised the researchers.
What filled the gap was troubling. Potentially dangerous bacteria made up about 93 percent of gut bacteria on average, and many carried antibiotic resistance genes. Co-author Karl Sylvester of Stanford called the U.S. infant gut clearly dysfunctional and suspects it plays a critical role in many childhood ailments.
The study situates this within a longer history: a substantial loss of Bifidobacteria over the past century, linked to more C-sections, antibiotic use and formula feeding. Yet the sample is modest, and further research is needed to confirm how common the deficiency is and what causes it.
A study published in Scientific Reports reports that about nine out of ten infants in its sample were missing a single gut bacterium: Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis, known as B. infantis. The researchers describe it as the largest effort so far to benchmark how widespread that gap is among U.S. infants, and what it does to the way their gut microbiomes function.
The work rests on fecal samples from 227 infants under six months old. The samples were collected during pediatrician office visits in five states: California, Georgia, Oregon, Pennsylvania and South Carolina. The team analyzed which bacteria were present and in what amounts, tested whether the bacteria could fully use human breast milk, and looked for antibiotic resistance genes. They excluded infants with jaundice, infants actively being treated with antibiotics, and infants diagnosed with problems absorbing carbohydrates in the intestine, because those conditions can change how the infant gut works.
B. infantis matters because of what it does with breast milk. Human milk contains carbohydrates called human milk oligosaccharides, or HMOs, which the infant cannot access on its own. B. infantis breaks them down into usable nutrients, and it differs from other Bifidobacteria species in being specifically adapted to human milk for this purpose. It is also increasingly linked to immune system development, to protecting the intestinal tract from dangerous bacteria, and to lower rates of common childhood conditions such as colic and diaper rash. The source describes B. infantis as having been widely considered among the most prevalent bacteria in infant intestines, which makes its absence in so many outwardly healthy babies a surprise.
The second finding concerns what was there instead. Potentially dangerous bacteria made up, on average, 93 percent of all bacteria in the infant gut microbiome. The most common were Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus and Clostridium difficile. Many of these are known to carry antibiotic resistance genes, and the researchers found 325 such genes in total, with 54 percent of them conferring resistance to multiple antibiotics.
Karl Sylvester, MD, a co-author, is a professor of surgery and pediatrics and associate dean of maternal child health research at Stanford University. He said the deficiency begins in the earliest weeks of life and is largely off the radar for parents and pediatricians. In his words, the infant gut is essentially a blank slate at birth that quickly picks up bacteria from the mother and environment. He said the team was surprised both by the lack of beneficial bacteria and by the high presence of potentially pathogenic ones and widespread antibiotic resistance. He called the U.S. infant gut microbiome clearly dysfunctional and said he believes this is a critical factor behind many infant and childhood ailments.
The study places this in a longer history. Evidence points to a substantial loss of Bifidobacteria in the infant gut over the past 100 years, with research citing more C-section deliveries, more antibiotic use and more infant formula use as contributing factors. Losing B. infantis, the source says, puts infants at greater risk of not getting the full value of breast milk, compromised immune development, a rise in harmful gut pathogens linked to increased gut pH, and a negative effect on the intestinal wall.
The sample is modest, though: 227 infants from five states, which alone cannot establish national prevalence or explain causes. Further research will be needed to confirm how common the deficiency is and what drives it.
Citazioni salienti
The infant gut microbiome in the U.S. is clearly dysfunctional, and we believe this is a critical factor underpinning many of the infant and childhood ailments we see today.— Karl Sylvester, MD, study co-author, Stanford University