In England, the higher education regulator has concluded that the long-trusted ritual of the unsupervised assignment may no longer prove what a student knows, because artificial intelligence can now carry much of that work in minutes and leave little trace. The finding, drawn from conversations with hundreds of university staff and students across more than a hundred institutions, asks universities to reconsider how they measure learning at a moment when the value of a degree depends on whether its grades still mean something. Universities are answering in different ways, with some returning t
Students Can Pass University Assessments With AI in Minutes, Regulator Warns
A generational risk to the system as it stands
Mark
What's the headline finding here, in plain terms?
Mimi
That many assessments students do unsupervised can be completed well with AI, sometimes in minutes, and the regulator says that can't be reliably detected.
Luke
Worth being clear on the base: 244 staff and 91 students, from at least 127 universities. That's views gathered, not a measurement of how many students actually cheat.
Mark
So it's about vulnerability, not proven misconduct?
Mimi
Mostly, yes. Though staff did describe students finishing whole assessments in minutes and getting similar grades, plus piles of near-identical submissions.
Luke
Those are reported cases. The source doesn't say how common they are.
Mark
What does the regulator want changed?
Mimi
More AI-free assessment, with closed-book and practical exams named as most effective. And replacement of any assessment that AI can pass without the skills being tested.
Luke
Universities UK says many have already moved to in-person exams, vivas and controlled AI use. We don't know how widespread that is against the 93 still using remote exams.
Mark
And the fee threat?
Mimi
Proposals would let the OfS bar fee increases or cap student numbers for universities missing quality standards. That's still a consultation.
Luke
Right, and the report doesn't say AI assessment alone would trigger it. Nothing is decided yet.
The Pulse
- An regulator warns that many unsupervised university assessments can be finished with AI, sometimes in minutes, and staff may never notice.
- Students who use AI and those who refuse it on environmental or ethical grounds are pulling the campus atmosphere apart.
- Universities are scrambling to shift toward closed-book exams, vivas, presentations and in-person tasks, while 93 UK institutions still rely on remote online exams.
- Proposals could bar non-compliant universities from raising fees or cap their student numbers, and the consultation outcome will decide how hard the squeeze lands.
In England, the higher education regulator has concluded that the long-trusted ritual of the unsupervised assignment may no longer prove what a student knows, because artificial intelligence can now carry much of that work in minutes and leave little trace. The finding, drawn from conversations with hundreds of university staff and students across more than a hundred institutions, asks universities to reconsider how they measure learning at a moment when the value of a degree depends on whether its grades still mean something. Universities are answering in different ways, with some returning to exams held in person and others building AI into their assessments under controlled conditions, while students and the sector continue to argue over what should be kept and what should be let go. The question now rests with a consultation that could tie tuition fees and student numbers to whether institutions can show their assessments are sound.
England's higher education regulator, the Office for Students, has delivered a hard verdict on university coursework. Working with the charity Advance HE, it found that many unsupervised assessments can be completed to a high standard with AI, sometimes within minutes, and that staff often cannot reliably detect it. The research drew on 244 staff and 91 students across at least 127 universities, and it included accounts of identical-looking assignments and staff who doubted their own assessments were fit for purpose.
The regulator's remedy is direct. Where an assessment can be done with AI without testing the underlying knowledge and skills, it should be replaced, with closed-book and practical exams judged the most effective. Remote online exams, which spread during Covid, are still used in some form by 93 UK universities, and the OfS sees them as a serious risk to credibility.
The sector's response is mixed. Universities UK says many institutions have already moved toward in-person exams, vivas, presentations and controlled uses of AI, and it wants to keep flexibility across subjects. The National Union of Students argues that essays and slideshows were already failing students and staff, and it calls for innovation designed with students rather than the defence of tradition.
The pressure is not only academic. Proposals now in consultation would allow the regulator to bar institutions that miss its quality standards from raising tuition fees or to limit their student numbers, which makes the outcome of that process the next decisive moment.
England's higher education regulator has put a blunt finding in front of universities: a lot of what students are asked to do for a grade can be done by AI, sometimes in minutes, and staff may never know. The Office for Students (OfS) says it is frequently possible for students to use AI "in ways that cannot be reliably detected."
The conclusion comes from new research by the OfS and Advance HE, a charity that gives awards for teaching excellence. It draws on the views of 244 higher education staff and 91 students from at least 127 universities. The researchers found that a significant proportion of assessments take place in unsupervised, uncontrolled formats where students can reach AI tools, and that many of these can be finished to a high standard with little engagement from the student.
Unsupervised assessment covers coursework, but also remote online exams, which spread widely during Covid. Research from Swansea University last year suggested that 93 universities in the UK still use them in some form. The OfS says this poses a significant risk to the credibility of assessment, and that closed-book and practical exams are the most effective alternatives.
The accounts gathered by the research are specific. The OfS heard of students completing entire assessments within minutes using AI and receiving grades similar to those of students who had not used it. Some staff reported receiving large numbers of assignments that looked the same, and some did not believe their institution's assessments were fit for purpose. Others described a polarised atmosphere, with students who use AI on one side and "conscientious objectors" who avoid it on environmental and other grounds on the other.
Josh Fleming, the OfS director of strategy and delivery, said there are fantastic examples of universities seizing the opportunities AI offers, but that there should be far greater use of AI-free assessment. He called the situation a generational risk to the system as it stands, threatening both students' learning and institutions' ability to assess them. The report is stark on the remedy: if an assessment can be completed with AI without the underlying knowledge and skills being tested, it should be replaced.
Kathryn Harrison-Graves, deputy chief executive of Advance HE, said students want greater clarity about what is expected of them, while staff have varying levels of confidence and support. The research also stressed the importance of AI literacy during and after university, and noted that some institutions already tell students clearly where AI can and cannot be used.
Universities UK, which represents more than 140 institutions, said universities are making significant progress. A spokesperson said there is further to go, but many have made substantial changes, including more in-person exams, presentations, vivas, process-based assessment, and assessments that integrate AI in a controlled way. The spokesperson added that different subjects need different approaches and that universities should keep the flexibility to choose them.
Lewis Wilson of the National Union of Students took a different line, saying AI is threatening traditional methods, such as essay questions, handouts and slideshows, that students and staff have long said are not fit for purpose. He urged the sector to drop outdated methods kept in the name of tradition and to back innovative practice co-designed with students.
The stakes are financial as well as academic. Under proposals now out for consultation, universities that fail to meet OfS quality standards could be barred from charging increased tuition fees or have caps placed on their student numbers. The outcome of that consultation is the thing to watch.
Notable Quotes
There should be far greater use of AI-free assessment.— Josh Fleming, director of strategy and delivery, Office for Students
Many have made substantial changes to how they assess students, including more in-person exams, presentations and vivas.— Universities UK spokesperson
Want the full story?
Read the original at BBC News ↗