Stellar Activity, Not a Giant Planet, Explains 70 Ophiuchi's 170-Year-Old Wobble

An upper limit, not a ban, on planets
Yiting Li on what the 70 Ophiuchi result means: giant planets are ruled out, smaller ones are not.
Mark

So the planet people thought they saw in 1855 isn't there?

Mimi

Not a Jupiter-sized one, not in the regions they checked. The wobble that looked like a planet came from changes on the stars' surfaces.

Mark

Why did it take 171 years?

Mimi

Earlier measurements never fully ruled out giant planets in the inner regions. Li pulled together about a century of historical data and added new observations from Chile and Texas.

Luke

Let me mark the boundary. The exclusions are specific: within 5 AU of star A and within half an AU of star B. Outside those zones, the reporting doesn't say.

Mimi

Right, and that's why the researchers frame it as a limit, not a ban.

Mark

What does the stellar-activity finding mean beyond this one system?

Mimi

Meyer called it a cautionary tale. Stars aren't perfectly stable, and their activity can imitate a planet in radial velocity data.

Luke

Worth noting Li's line that she'd wager other planets exist is a bet, not a finding. Nothing in the study confirms a small planet.

Mark

And the habitable zone angle?

Mimi

It's possible, not established. Even a rocky planet there wouldn't prove life.

Luke

Same caution applies to the missions. Meyer expects 70 Oph AB to be a target for the Habitable World Observatory, but that's his expectation, and SHERA is still a mission under study.

  • A 171-year-old planetary hope, first raised in 1855 and later dismissed, flickered back to life through a stubborn wobble in starlight.
  • Astronomers faced a puzzle: was the tug on 70 Ophiuchi's stars a hidden giant planet, or merely the stars misleading their watchers?
  • A century of historical measurements was stitched together with fresh data from telescopes in Chile and Texas to separate planet from stellar noise.
  • The verdict points to shifting stellar surface activity, ruling out Jupiter-sized planets within 5 AU of the primary and 0.5 AU of its companion.
  • The door remains open for Saturn-sized and smaller worlds, and future flagship missions like the Habitable Worlds Observatory may come searching.

For more than a century and a half, a faint tremor in the light of a pair of nearby stars invited the hope that a giant world lay hidden among them. Now the careful accumulation of old records and new observations has traced that tremor to the restless surfaces of the stars themselves, closing one chapter of an old human question about whether we are alone among the stars. The silence about giant planets is not an emptiness, for smaller and perhaps habitable worlds may still wait in the quiet regions the instruments have not yet reached.

In 1855, the British astronomer William Jacob proposed that a planet circled one of the stars in 70 Ophiuchi, a pair about 16 light-years from Earth. It was the first exoplanet candidate ever proposed for a star system. The claim was later rejected, yet the faint signal in the stars' motion never quite went away.

Now, 171 years later, a team led by the University of Michigan and postdoctoral researcher Yiting Li has explained that signal. It came from the stars themselves, not from a giant planet. By combining roughly a century of historical measurements with new observations from the Magellan Clay Telescope in Chile and the Harlan J. Smith Telescope in Texas, the researchers showed that shifting activity on the stars' surfaces mimicked the wobble a planet would cause.

The team found no Jupiter-sized planets within 5 astronomical units of 70 Oph A or within half an astronomical unit of 70 Oph B. Michael Meyer, a senior co-author, called the result a cautionary tale about how stellar activity can imitate planets in radial velocity data. The study also precisely mapped the orbits of the two stars.

The system is not empty, though. The method was built to find giant planets, so Saturn-sized and smaller worlds, including rocky planets in the habitable zone, remain possible. Li described the result as an upper limit rather than a ban, and said she would bet that other planets are out there. The finding is part of a broader effort to plan future searches, and 70 Oph AB may become a target for upcoming flagship missions such as the Habitable Worlds Observatory.

In 1855, a British astronomer named William Jacob proposed that a planet circled one of the stars in 70 Ophiuchi, a pair of stars about 16 light-years from Earth. That made it the first star system with an officially proposed exoplanet candidate. His claim was later rejected. Now, 171 years after he made it, a University of Michigan-led team has explained the signal that kept the idea alive: it came from the stars themselves, not from a giant planet.

The system, known as 70 Oph AB, is a binary in which two stars orbit each other. The researchers searched it for planets as massive as Jupiter or larger and found none in the regions they examined. Around 70 Oph A, they excluded such planets within 5 astronomical units. Around 70 Oph B, they excluded them within half an astronomical unit. An astronomical unit is the average distance between Earth and the Sun, about 93 million miles.

The long-standing puzzle involved radial velocity, a measure of how fast a star moves toward or away from us. A planet's gravity tugs its star slightly back and forth, producing a wobble that shows up in the star's light. For years, the wobble in 70 Oph AB looked like what a Jupiter-sized planet might cause. Measurements over the past 171 years had never fully eliminated that possibility in the system's inner regions.

To test it, the team, led by postdoctoral researcher Yiting Li, combined roughly a century of historical measurements with new observations from two telescopes: the 6.5-meter Magellan Clay Telescope at Las Campanas Observatory in Chile and the 2.7-meter Harlan J. Smith Telescope at McDonald Observatory in Texas. The analysis was sensitive enough to separate the apparent planetary signal from changes on the stars. The team concluded that variations in stellar surface activity over time produced the wobble. Scientists from more than a dozen institutions took part, including NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and IPAC at Caltech. NASA supported the work in part, and the Heising-Simons Foundation provided additional funding. The results appear in The Astrophysical Journal.

Michael Meyer, a senior co-author and chair of Michigan's astronomy department, said Li assembled an enormous amount of data from around the world and carefully explored every possibility. He called the result a cautionary tale about how stellar activity can mimic planet signals in radial velocity data. The study also pins down the orbits of 70 Oph A and 70 Oph B as some of the most precisely understood stellar orbits in the sky.

The result does not make the system empty. The team's approach was built to find giant planets, not small ones, so Saturn-sized and smaller worlds remain possible, including rocky planets in the habitable zone, where temperatures could allow liquid water on a surface if the atmosphere is suitable. Finding such a planet would not by itself show that life exists there. Li described the finding as an upper limit, not a ban, and said that given how common planets are in the Milky Way, she would wager other planets are there. She called the result a mix of disappointment and excitement.

The system matters partly because of where it sits. Roughly half of all stellar systems in the Milky Way hold at least two stars, and 70 Oph AB is the third closest binary to Earth, after Alpha Centauri at 4.2 light-years and 61 Cygni at 11.4.

Meyer said the new limit helps in designing future search strategies. Michigan is part of a team studying a space mission called SHERA, which would focus on binaries, with 70 Oph AB among a handful of targets. He expects the system to be a target for flagship missions such as NASA's Habitable World Observatory, which could study smaller planets that current instruments cannot yet detect.

The study sets an upper limit, not a ban, on planets.
— Yiting Li, University of Michigan
It's a cautionary tale about how stellar activity can mimic planet signals using the radial velocity.
— Michael Meyer, University of Michigan
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur Science Daily ↗
Nous contacter FAQ