Starship Ship Caught by Launch Tower Arms on 15th Flight, but Booster Lost in Gulf of Mexico

The arms closed around it.
Starship's spacecraft was caught by the Starbase launch tower for the first time after more than 22 hours in space.
Mark

So the spacecraft was caught by the tower for the first time. Why does that matter more than just landing it?

Mimi

Because the design depends on it. Starship is meant to return both stages to the launch site and be caught, so the spacecraft, the part that actually delivers payloads, had to prove it could do that.

Mark

And it was a long flight too.

Mimi

More than 22 hours, the longest yet. It reached orbit, deployed 26 Starlink V3 satellites, then came back through cloud over the Texas coast and was caught.

Luke

Worth saying the booster did not make it. The plan was a double catch, and that didn't happen.

Mimi

Right. A technical issue after stage separation sent the booster to a splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico instead.

Luke

Do we know what the issue was?

Mimi

Not from this reporting. It says only that a technical issue occurred, and that the booster has to be fine-tuned further.

Mark

The reaction was very enthusiastic. Isaacman said "almost magic."

Luke

Enthusiasm isn't evidence of reuse, though. Curlee's point is that one catch doesn't prove the system. She wants repeated successes. And the reporting doesn't say whether the caught spacecraft is fit to fly again.

Mimi

And the heat shield is not yet fully reusable, which bears directly on that question.

Mark

So what's still open?

Mimi

Catching both stages in one mission, a reusable heat shield, and fuel transfer in orbit, which the moon and Mars missions require.

Luke

Hourly launches and orbiting data centers are Musk's goals, not anything demonstrated here.

  • A spacecraft returning from orbit was snatched from the sky by the launch tower's mechanical arms, a first that sent a jolt through the program.
  • The planned double catch collapsed when the Super Heavy booster was diverted after a stage-separation fault and splashed into the Gulf of Mexico.
  • Engineers are working to turn this single success into a repeatable routine, with recovery of both stages on one mission still ahead.
  • Experts warn that a handful of wins is not enough, and the heat shield, orbital fuel transfer and booster refinement remain open problems.

On a Saturday in Texas, a machine of steel arms reached into the sky and caught the upper stage of a rocket returning from orbit, a small but resonant moment in humanity's long effort to make the act of leaving Earth something we can do again and again. The spacecraft had spent more than twenty-two hours on its fifteenth test flight, deploying satellites in orbit before threading back through clouds to be held by the launch tower it had departed from. The booster meant to be caught alongside it was lost to the Gulf of Mexico after a stage-separation fault, so the day's promise was only half kept. Still, the question it raises is an old one, whether what we build to reach the heavens can be brought home and flown once more.

On Saturday, the Starship spacecraft came home to its launch site in Texas and was caught out of the air by the giant mechanical arms of the launch tower. It was the first time an upper stage had been captured this way, and SpaceX treated it as a major step toward a fully reusable launch system.

The flight had lifted off from Starbase the afternoon before. It was Starship's fifteenth test and its longest yet, more than twenty-two hours in space. In orbit the spacecraft completed its insertion burn and deployed 26 Starlink V3 satellites before turning back toward Earth.

The return passed through thick clouds over the Texas coast. Emerging from them, the vehicle relit three engines, rotated upright and slowed toward the tower, and the arms closed around it. Elon Musk shared videos of the spacecraft suspended between them, calling it looking great.

The day was not a clean sweep. The plan had been to catch the booster as well, but after a technical issue at stage separation it was diverted and lost in the Gulf of Mexico.

The stakes lie in the design. Starship is meant to carry crew and cargo to orbit, the Moon, Mars and beyond, with both stages returning to be reused, unlike Falcon 9's discarded upper stage. NASA, which hopes to use Starship as an Artemis lunar lander, welcomed the catch, and experts called it a huge technical achievement. Others cautioned that repeated successes are needed before the system can be trusted with sensitive payloads. Obstacles remain: recovering both stages in one mission, a heat shield that is not yet fully reusable, and in-orbit fuel transfer that future lunar and Mars missions will require.

On Saturday, the Starship spacecraft came back to its launch site in Texas and was grabbed out of the air by the giant mechanical arms of the launch tower. It was the first time the upper stage of SpaceX's rocket had been caught that way, and the company treated it as a major step toward a fully reusable launch system.

The flight began on Friday afternoon from SpaceX's Starbase facility in Texas. It was Starship's 15th flight test, and it turned into the vehicle's longest mission so far, lasting more than 22 hours in space before the spacecraft returned on Saturday.

In orbit, the spacecraft performed its orbital insertion burn and entered Earth orbit. It then deployed 26 Starlink V3 satellites.

The return came through thick clouds over the Texas coast. After emerging from them, the spacecraft reignited three engines, flipped into a vertical position and slowed its descent toward the tower. The arms then closed around it. Elon Musk, SpaceX's chief executive, congratulated the team and posted videos of the spacecraft suspended between the arms, saying it "looks great."

The day was not a clean sweep. The mission had been planned to catch both the spacecraft and its Super Heavy booster on the same flight. After a technical issue following stage separation, the booster was diverted from its planned return to the launch site and splashed down in the Gulf of Mexico instead.

The stakes come from how Starship is designed. Starship, meaning the spacecraft and Super Heavy together, is meant to be a fully reusable system for carrying crew and cargo to Earth orbit, the moon, Mars and beyond. SpaceX's Falcon 9 reuses its first stage, but its upper stage, the part that delivers payloads to orbit, is discarded after each flight. Starship is intended to bring both stages back to the launch site to be caught.

NASA has a direct interest. The agency expects Starship to serve as a lunar lander for its Artemis mission, and NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman called the recovery "almost magic" and "one step closer to (the moon)." Clayton Swope, an aerospace expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, called it a "huge technical achievement" that proves the idea of a fully reusable Starship can work.

Others were more measured. Kathleen Curlee, an analyst at Georgetown University's Center for Security and Emerging Technology, praised the result but said SpaceX needs multiple repeated successes to prove it can handle sensitive payloads and missions.

Musk's longer-term vision is a workhorse of "rapidly reusable" rockets, with a goal of hourly launches that could send items such as internet satellites and data centers into space. Several obstacles remain. SpaceX has yet to recover both stages in a single mission. The heat shield, made of black hexagonal tiles that protect the vehicle during reentry, is not yet fully reusable. The company must also solve the problem of transferring fuel to the spacecraft in orbit, which future moon and Mars missions require, and it must further refine the Super Heavy booster, which ran into trouble during its descent on Friday.

A huge technical achievement and proves the whole idea of Starship as a fully reusable spaceship can work.
— Clayton Swope, Center for Strategic and International Studies
SpaceX needs multiple repeated successes to prove the capability to handle sensitive payloads and missions.
— Kathleen Curlee, Georgetown University's Center for Security and Emerging Technology
Vuoi la storia completa? Leggi l'originale su CGTN ↗
Contattaci Domande frequenti