Starmer pledges UK support as outgoing PM visits Kyiv, announces Gripen jet funding

At least 12 civilians killed in Russian attacks on Ukrainian towns on Thursday; one person died in Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant drone strike; one civilian killed in Belgorod shelling.
The resolve of the United Kingdom remains the same, it will not waver.
Starmer pledged continuity in British support for Ukraine despite his imminent departure as prime minister.
Mark

So Starmer goes to Kyiv on his way out the door. What's the actual substance here—is this just a farewell tour, or is there something concrete?

Mimi

The 300 million euros for the Gripen jets is concrete. Sixteen aircraft, delivery by 2029. That's a real commitment that outlasts his time in office.

Luke

But we should be clear: that's funding, not the jets themselves. The jets come from Sweden. Britain is paying for them, but the delivery timeline is 2029—that's three years away. We don't know yet if that holds.

Mark

Fair. So what about the political message—the "resolve will not waver" line?

Mimi

He's trying to tell Zelenskyy that a change in British leadership doesn't mean a change in British policy. It's reassurance at a moment when Zelenskyy is actually under pressure at home.

Luke

Right, and that's the real story. Starmer's visit is overshadowed by Zelenskyy firing Fedorov, the popular defence minister. Over a thousand people protesting outside the presidential office.

Mark

Why did he fire him?

Mimi

The official reason is that relations between the defence ministry and the military leadership had broken down. Fedorov was seen as an innovator—he pushed drone technology—but he clashed with the traditional military establishment, particularly with General Syrskyi.

Luke

And Zelenskyy sided with Syrskyi. That's the choice that's angering people. Fedorov was popular; Syrskyi represents the old guard.

Mark

How much political risk is Zelenskyy taking here?

Mimi

Significant. He's under martial law, so he doesn't face elections, but he's reshuffled his government multiple times. This one feels different because it's dividing civil society.

Luke

We should also note the human cost on Thursday alone—at least 12 civilians killed in Russian and Ukrainian attacks across multiple cities. And then the nuclear plant incident, which is still unclear who was responsible.

Mark

So Starmer's visit, the jets, the reassurance—all of that is happening against a backdrop of internal political strain and ongoing civilian casualties.

Mimi

Exactly. The war isn't pausing for any of this. It's just the context in which these decisions are being made.

  • Starmer, days from leaving office, flew to Kyiv to ensure his departure would not be read as a weakening of British resolve — a symbolic act as much as a diplomatic one.
  • Britain's pledge of 16 Gripen fighter jets, funded at €300 million and deliverable by 2029, offers Ukraine a meaningful upgrade in air capability, though the timeline stretches well into an uncertain future.
  • Zelenskyy's removal of defence minister Fedorov — a celebrated architect of Ukraine's drone warfare — has cracked open a public rift, with over 1,000 protesters demanding his reinstatement outside the presidential office.
  • At least 12 civilians were killed across Ukraine on Thursday in Russian strikes on Zaporizhzhia, Odesa, Kharkiv, and Kupiansk, as the war's daily violence continued without pause.
  • A drone strike killing the chief engineer of the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant has drawn international alarm, with the IAEA warning of a serious threat to nuclear safety and both sides trading blame.

As Keir Starmer made his final journey to Kyiv as British prime minister, he carried with him both a pledge and a farewell — affirming that Britain's commitment to Ukraine would outlast any change in its own leadership. His visit, marked by a €300 million funding announcement for Swedish Gripen jets, arrived at a moment when Ukraine itself was navigating internal fractures, with Zelenskyy's dismissal of a popular defence minister drawing protests in the streets outside his own office. The war, now approaching five years, continues to exact its toll on civilians and institutions alike, and a drone strike near the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant served as a reminder that the conflict's dangers extend well beyond the front lines.

Keir Starmer arrived in Kyiv on Thursday for his final visit as British prime minister, meeting Zelenskyy and offering a pointed assessment: Ukraine would win. His confidence, he said, was grounded in what he had witnessed of Ukrainian fighting capability — a force he described as probably the most effective in Europe, distinguished not by size but by its mastery of modern warfare. He was careful to frame his visit as a message of continuity. A change in British leadership, he insisted, would not alter the country's commitment. To give that pledge material weight, London announced €300 million in funding for 16 Swedish Gripen jets — aircraft capable of air-to-air combat, ground strikes, and reconnaissance — to be delivered to Ukraine by 2029.

The visit landed in the middle of a political storm of Zelenskyy's own making. The Ukrainian president had recently dismissed Mykhailo Fedorov, his defence minister and a widely admired figure credited with building Ukraine's drone capabilities into a strategic asset. The decision reflected an irreparable breakdown between the defence ministry and General Syrskyi's military leadership, but it provoked immediate public anger. More than 1,000 people gathered outside the presidential office demanding Fedorov's return. Zelenskyy had also replaced his prime minister as part of a broader reshuffle — moves that, nearly four and a half years into the full-scale invasion, felt more divisive than any reorganisation before them.

The war itself offered no pause for politics. Russian strikes on Thursday killed at least 12 civilians across Zaporizhzhia, Odesa, Kharkiv, and the Donetsk region. Ukrainian forces struck a settlement in Russia's Belgorod region, killing one. And at the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, a drone strike killed the facility's chief engineer. Russia blamed Ukraine; Ukraine denied it. The IAEA's chief condemned the attack and warned of grave risks to nuclear safety — a reminder that in this conflict, the most dangerous miscalculations may not happen on the battlefield at all.

Keir Starmer arrived in Kyiv on Thursday for what would be his final visit as British prime minister, stepping into a country at war and a government in the midst of internal upheaval. He met with Volodymyr Zelenskyy and, in an interview with Sky News, offered a clear assessment: Ukraine would win this war. The confidence was rooted not in wishful thinking, Starmer suggested, but in what he had observed of Ukrainian fighting capability. "What they've shown is that it's not just the size of your army, it's how you fight a modern conflict," he said. "And so they are probably the most effective fighting machine in Europe."

The timing of the visit carried weight. Starmer was days away from stepping down as Labour leader, and a new British prime minister would soon take office. Yet he wanted to signal continuity. The change in London's leadership, he said, would not alter Britain's commitment to Ukraine. "The resolve of the United Kingdom remains the same, it will not waver." To underline that pledge, the British government announced 300 million euros in funding to support the delivery of 16 Swedish Gripen fighter jets to Ukraine by 2029. The aircraft are capable of air-to-air combat, ground strikes, and reconnaissance—capabilities Ukraine has long sought to strengthen its air defenses.

But Starmer's visit coincided with a moment of political turbulence in Kyiv itself. On the same day, Zelenskyy moved to defend his recent decision to dismiss Mykhailo Fedorov, Ukraine's defence minister, a figure who had become popular both within government and among the public. Fedorov had earned a reputation as an innovator, particularly in developing drone technology that had become central to Ukraine's military strategy. His removal, however, signaled a deeper fracture: relations between the defence ministry and the country's top military leadership, headed by General Oleksandr Syrskyi, had deteriorated beyond repair. Zelenskyy's choice to back Syrskyi over Fedorov provoked immediate backlash. More than 1,000 protesters gathered outside the presidential office in Kyiv on Thursday, holding signs demanding Fedorov's reinstatement.

The personnel shake-up extended beyond the defence ministry. Zelenskyy had also replaced his prime minister as part of a broader government reshuffle. These moves, coming as the full-scale Russian invasion approached its fourth and a half year, represented a test of Zelenskyy's political authority. Operating under martial law, he had no obligation to hold elections, but he had periodically reorganized his government. This moment felt different—more consequential, more divisive.

Meanwhile, the war itself continued its grinding toll. On Thursday alone, Russian and Ukrainian attacks on civilian areas across multiple towns and cities killed at least 12 people, according to local officials. A Russian guided bomb struck Zaporizhzhia in the southeast, killing three and wounding 15. Russian missiles hit the Black Sea port of Odesa, killing two and injuring six. Near Kharkiv, close to the Russian border, a drone attack killed one person. Further east, near Kupiansk, another drone strike killed three. In Donetsk region, one more person was killed. Ukrainian forces, in turn, shelled a settlement near the border in Russia's Belgorod Region, killing one person.

A separate incident at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant—which Russia occupies—added another layer of concern. A drone strike killed Aleksandr Yakovlev, the chief engineer of the facility. Russia claimed Ukrainian forces were responsible; Ukraine rejected the accusation as baseless and said Moscow had offered no evidence. The head of Russia's state nuclear company, Alexei Likhachev, stated that a Ukrainian drone had struck a service vehicle near the plant. Rafael Grossi, chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency, condemned what he called an unacceptable attack on the facility, warning that it posed a serious threat to nuclear safety. The incident underscored how the conflict had extended into domains where miscalculation could carry consequences far beyond the immediate battlefield.

Ukraine will win this war. What they've shown is that it's not just the size of your army, it's how you fight a modern conflict. They are probably the most effective fighting machine in Europe.
— Keir Starmer, in an interview with Sky News
Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em The Guardian ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ