Spitting allegation mars Ireland-Israel draw as political tensions overshadow football

I wish no national team to go through what we have gone through
Ireland's manager on the toll of two weeks of political pressure surrounding the fixtures.
Mark

Why did Ireland and Israel even play each other if the political situation was this volatile?

Mimi

They're in the same UEFA Nations League group, so the fixtures were scheduled before the current tensions escalated. Once they were on the calendar, withdrawing became its own kind of statement—and Ireland faced pressure both ways: some wanted them to boycott, others wanted them to play.

Luke

But we should be clear: the source doesn't say how many people called for a boycott or how much political pressure there actually was. It says "some supporters and politicians." That's not nothing, but it's also not quantified.

Mark

Fair point. So what changed between the first match and the second?

Mimi

The first match was in Hungary, 3-0 to Ireland, also behind closed doors. By the second match a week later, tensions hadn't cooled—if anything, they'd sharpened. The armbands tell you something: Ireland mourning Gaza, Israel mourning October 7. Both legitimate, both present, both irreconcilable in that moment.

Luke

And then the spitting allegation. But here's what we actually know: an Irish coach said it happened. The Israeli coach wasn't there. UEFA will investigate. We don't have a video, we don't have multiple witnesses on record, we don't have the Israeli player's response.

Mark

So it's unresolved.

Luke

Completely. And that matters. The story is real—the allegation is real, the investigation will happen—but we can't say what actually occurred.

Mimi

What we can say is that the match itself was poor football, the atmosphere was suffocating, and both managers seemed relieved it was over.

Mark

Hallgrimsson said it took a toll. What kind of toll?

Mimi

He didn't specify, but two weeks of this—the boycott pressure, the political weight, the closed doors, the armbands, the no handshakes—that's not a normal international break. His players had to perform under conditions most footballers never face.

Luke

And we don't know if the spitting happened because of that pressure or in spite of it, or if it's even connected to the political situation at all. It might just be a moment of frustration in a tense match.

  • With no crowd, no pennant exchange, and opposing players bowing their heads through each other's anthems, the atmosphere in Belgrade carried the weight of a conflict far larger than any league table.
  • A spitting allegation against an Israeli player — directed at an Irish coaching staff member in the halftime tunnel — threatened to transform a tense but forgettable draw into a formal diplomatic and disciplinary incident.
  • Ireland's manager, visibly worn down by two weeks of political pressure and public scrutiny, declined to detail what he witnessed, deferring instead to UEFA's disciplinary process.
  • Israel's coach denied knowledge of the incident and defended his players' conduct, framing the 1-1 result as a show of resilience after a 3-0 defeat the week prior.
  • The Football Association of Ireland's decision to stage both matches behind closed doors and on neutral ground contained the protests but could not contain the tension, which ultimately spilled into the tunnel rather than the stands.

On a football pitch in Belgrade, two nations brought their grief onto the same field — Ireland and Israel drawing 1-1 in a UEFA Nations League match played without spectators, without handshakes, and without the pretense that sport exists apart from history. Each team wore black armbands for different dead, and when the whistle blew at halftime, an allegation of spitting in the tunnel reminded the world that the distance between nations is not always measured in goals. The match was the second of two fixtures played under extraordinary political pressure, and its conclusion offered less resolution than relief.

Ireland and Israel drew 1-1 on Sunday in Belgrade, the second of two UEFA Nations League fixtures played behind closed doors amid the long shadow of the Gaza conflict. A week earlier, Ireland had won 3-0 in Hungary — also without spectators — after facing calls at home to withdraw from the matches entirely. This second encounter, in Serbia, was quieter in the stands but heavier in atmosphere.

There were no pre-match handshakes and no exchange of pennants. Both squads wore black armbands, but for different losses: Ireland's for victims of Israel's war in Gaza, Israel's for the victims of the October 7, 2023 attack. Troy Parrott gave Ireland the lead from the penalty spot before halftime; Dor Peretz equalized shortly after with Israel's first shot on target. The football itself was unremarkable. What was not unremarkable happened in the tunnel.

Damien Doyle, a member of Ireland's coaching staff, alleged that an Israeli player spat at him after the teams left the field at halftime. The claim surfaced in Irish media and was raised at the post-match press conference. Ireland's manager, Heimir Hallgrimsson, confirmed he was present but declined to elaborate, saying only that a disciplinary committee would review the matter. He made no effort to conceal his exhaustion. 'I'm absolutely delighted this is finished,' he told reporters, crediting his players for enduring two weeks of extraordinary pressure.

Israel's coach, Ran Ben-Shimon, said he had been in the dressing room and saw nothing, but pledged to investigate. He defended his players' character and framed the draw as a sign of resilience. The standings — Ireland third, Israel last — felt almost beside the point. What remained was a disciplinary process, an unresolved allegation, and the quiet relief that, for now, these two teams would not meet again.

The match ended in a draw, but the real contest had nothing to do with the scoreline. Ireland and Israel played to a 1-1 tie on Sunday in Serbia, the second of two UEFA Nations League fixtures that became less about football than about the weight of geopolitics pressing down on every moment of play.

The two teams had met a week earlier in Hungary, where Ireland won 3-0 behind closed doors after facing pressure from supporters and politicians at home to withdraw entirely from the fixtures. That first match was tense. This one, played again without spectators in Belgrade, was tenser still. There were no pre-match handshakes, no exchange of pennants. When each national anthem played, the opposing players bowed their heads in silence. Ireland's squad wore black armbands for the victims of Israel's war in Gaza. Israel's players wore black armbands for the victims of the October 7, 2023 attack that began the conflict. Two nations, two griefs, no common ground.

Troy Parrott scored from the penalty spot in the 39th minute to give Ireland the lead. Dor Peretz equalized immediately after halftime with Israel's first shot on target. The match itself was poor—neither side created much, Israel struck the woodwork twice, and the game drifted toward its conclusion without drama or quality. But in the tunnel at halftime, something happened that would outlast the final whistle.

Damien Doyle, one of Ireland's coaching staff, accused an Israeli player of spitting at him after the teams left the field. The allegation surfaced in Irish media reports and was raised at the post-match news conference. Ireland's manager, Heimir Hallgrimsson, was present for whatever occurred but offered no details. "I was there. I'm not going to comment," he said. "It's something a disciplinary committee will look at." Hallgrimsson, an Icelandic coach who had steered his team through two weeks of extraordinary pressure, seemed exhausted by the entire ordeal. "I'm absolutely delighted this is finished," he told reporters. "It's taken a toll out of us all. I've given so much credit to the players. They have been absolutely amazing in tough times, and I wish no national team to go through what we have gone through for the last two weeks."

Israel's coach, Ran Ben-Shimon, said he had been in the dressing room during halftime and saw nothing. He promised to investigate and respond later. When asked about the broader atmosphere and whether his players had been overly aggressive, Ben-Shimon pushed back. "When I come to a game, I say to my players, 'This is the best way to play the cleanest football as you can, but be aggressive.' I never say to injure someone; this is not our way. We are very human, human beings; we are very moral human beings," he said. He welcomed his team's response to the 3-0 defeat in the first match, framing the draw as evidence of resilience.

The results left Ireland third in Group B3 with five points, three behind Austria. Kosovo sat second on goal difference. Israel remained at the bottom with two points from two matches. But the standings felt almost incidental. What mattered was that the two-week ordeal was over, that no more matches between these teams loomed in the immediate future, and that a disciplinary process would now examine what happened in that tunnel. The Football Association of Ireland had chosen to stage both matches away from home, behind closed doors, to manage the political pressure. It had not been enough to prevent the tension from boiling over. Whether a committee review would clarify what happened, or whether it would simply add another layer of dispute to an already fractured encounter, remained to be seen.

I'm absolutely delighted this is finished. It's taken a toll out of us all.
— Ireland manager Heimir Hallgrimsson
I was there. I'm not going to comment. It's something a disciplinary committee will look at.
— Hallgrimsson, on the spitting allegation
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur Al Jazeera ↗
Nous contacter FAQ