Spanish right blocks housing crisis relief as protests swell

87-year-old Maricarmen Abascal, who uses a wheelchair, was evicted from her home of 70 years after facing a 230% rent increase from an investment fund.
You're with the social majority or with speculators
Sánchez framed the parliamentary vote as a choice between supporting ordinary people or protecting investment interests.
Mark

So the government tried to pass emergency housing measures and the right-wing parties blocked them. But what were people actually expecting to happen?

Mimi

The decrees included a ban on evictions until 2030 and new rules on short-term rentals. For a country where rents have jumped 80 percent in ten years, it felt like the government was finally doing something concrete.

Luke

But we should be clear—those decrees would have needed parliamentary approval to become law, and the votes weren't there. The People's party, Vox, and Junts had the numbers to stop them.

Mark

Why did the right-wing parties vote against it? That seems politically risky when people are this angry.

Mimi

The People's party said their philosophy is that you solve housing by building more homes, not by regulating the market. They argued that decrees don't make housing affordable—construction does.

Luke

That's their stated position. Whether it's actually a solution to a crisis where rents have nearly doubled in a decade is a separate question. But we should report what they said, not what we think of it.

Mark

And the protests—how big are we talking?

Mimi

Tens of thousands took to the streets after an 87-year-old woman was evicted from her home of 70 years because her rent was being raised 230 percent. By Friday, the main encampment in Madrid had grown to over 1,200 tents in just one week.

Luke

That's a real number from the reporting. What we don't know yet is whether this translates into sustained political pressure or whether it fades.

Mark

Is the government actually considering early elections?

Mimi

Sources told Eldiario.es that the Socialists were mulling it—possibly moving elections to November instead of next year. The housing crisis has become the dominant issue, which helps Sánchez after some difficult weeks.

Luke

That's sourced reporting, but it's also speculation about internal government thinking. We know they're considering it; we don't know what they'll decide.

Mark

What happens next?

Mimi

The tenant unions are calling for a general strike. People in the encampments say they won't stop. But parliament has already voted. The decrees are dead.

Luke

And that's the real tension—public anger versus parliamentary gridlock. We'll see if one can move the other.

  • An 87-year-old wheelchair-bound woman evicted after a 230% rent hike became the spark that turned diffuse frustration into a movement — encampments with street names, medical tents, and over 1,200 tents now occupy Madrid's central plaza.
  • Parliament's right-wing bloc killed two sweeping emergency decrees — eviction bans, rental regulations — arguing that construction, not intervention, is the only legitimate cure for unaffordable housing.
  • The Confederation of Tenants' Unions responded to the parliamentary defeat by calling for a general strike, refusing to treat the vote as a final answer.
  • Behind closed doors, the Socialist government is reportedly weighing early elections, betting that public fury over housing — with rents consuming nearly 99% of a young worker's monthly income — could be converted into a political mandate.
  • The investment fund that evicted Maricarmen Abascal quietly offered to let her return at a reduced rent — a gesture that resolved nothing structural and satisfied almost no one.

In Spain, a parliament divided along ideological lines has refused to act on a housing emergency that millions of its citizens are living inside — not as abstraction, but as daily dispossession. The defeat of emergency decrees that would have frozen evictions and regulated rents arrived the same week that an 87-year-old woman in a wheelchair was removed from the home she had occupied for seven decades, her story becoming the human face of a decade-long crisis in which rents have climbed 80 percent and homeownership has receded from an entire generation. What is unfolding in Spain is an old tension wearing new clothes: the question of whether a market, left to its own logic, will eventually consume the social fabric that makes it possible.

On a Friday in October, Spain's parliament voted down two emergency decrees meant to address a housing crisis that has been building for a decade. The conservative People's Party, the far-right Vox, and the Catalan pro-independence Junts joined to defeat measures that would have banned evictions until 2030 and regulated short-term and room-by-room rentals. Outside the chamber, hundreds of protesters held signs depicting vultures and chanted against a system they believe has chosen profit over people.

The opposition's argument was ideological and blunt: housing becomes affordable through construction, not regulation. The government's counter was equally stark — without intervention, the market would hollow out society itself. The numbers underneath the debate were staggering. Rents across Spain had risen 80 percent in a single decade. Home prices climbed 63 percent. The average monthly rent had reached €1,176 — nearly the entire monthly income of someone under 30.

The crisis had already found its symbol. On the last day of September, Maricarmen Abascal — 87 years old, a wheelchair user — was evicted from the apartment where she had lived for 70 years after an investment fund purchased her building and demanded a 230 percent rent increase. Her displacement ignited something. Encampments spread across Spanish cities. The one in Madrid's Puerta del Sol grew to more than 1,200 tents within a week, complete with its own street names, a medical center, and a co-working space.

When the parliamentary defeat was announced, disappointment moved through the encampments. The Confederation of Tenants' Unions called for a general strike. Prime Minister Sánchez framed the vote in binary terms on social media: you were either with the social majority or with speculators. Sources close to the government suggested early elections — possibly in November — were being considered, a gamble that public anger might yet translate into a governing mandate.

The investment fund that evicted Abascal later offered to let her return at a lower rent. It was a small concession that changed nothing systemic. The tents remained. The question hanging over all of it was whether sustained pressure in the streets could move a parliament that had already, clearly, made its choice.

In the chamber of Spain's parliament on Friday, lawmakers from the conservative People's party, the far-right Vox, and the Catalan pro-independence Junts voted down two emergency decrees designed to address the country's deepening housing crisis. Outside, hundreds of protesters held signs bearing images of vultures and chanted "Your profits, our misery" as Pedro Sánchez's Socialist-led coalition watched its relief package collapse.

The decrees were sweeping in scope. They would have banned evictions until 2030, regulated temporary lettings and room-by-room rentals, and attempted to inject what the government framed as order and humanity into a market spinning beyond control. Juan Bravo, a lawmaker from the People's party, explained the opposition's reasoning with a phrase that would echo through the debate: housing becomes affordable through construction, not regulation. Build more homes, the argument went, and prices will follow. The government countered that without intervention, the market would destroy society itself.

The political theater masked a genuine crisis. Across Spain, rents had climbed 80 percent in a single decade. Home prices rose 63 percent in the same period. The Youth Council of Spain reported that the average monthly rent had reached €1,176—nearly 99 percent of what someone under 30 earned in a month. For millions of Spaniards, housing had become not a right but a luxury they could not afford.

The anger had a face. On the last day of September, Maricarmen Abascal, an 87-year-old woman who uses a wheelchair, was evicted from the apartment where she had lived for seven decades. An investment fund had purchased the building and demanded a rent increase of 230 percent. She could not pay. She had to leave. The image of her displacement ignited something. Tens of thousands took to the streets. Encampments appeared in cities across Spain. By Friday, the camp in Madrid's Puerta del Sol plaza had grown to more than 1,200 tents—a makeshift city with its own street names, a medical center, and a co-working space. It was a week old and still swelling.

When news of the parliamentary defeat reached the encampment, disappointment rippled through. Marta García, one of the protesters, said she had believed at least one of the decrees would pass. The Confederation of Tenants' Unions responded with defiance, calling for a general strike and urging people to mobilize further. They would not stop. The parliament had shown its true colors, Sánchez said on social media—you were either with the social majority or with speculators. There was no middle ground.

The vote revealed a fractured parliament unable to act on an issue that polls suggested two-thirds of Spaniards wanted the government to address. Behind closed doors, sources told the news site Eldiario.es that the Socialist government was considering calling elections early, possibly in November, gambling that public anger over housing might translate into political gain. The housing crisis had become the dominant conversation in Spain, pushing aside other controversies that had weakened the government weeks before. Now it was the only thing anyone wanted to discuss.

What remained unclear was whether anger in the streets could move a parliament that had already decided. The investment firm that had evicted Abascal announced it would allow her to return at a lower rent—a small victory that did not solve the underlying problem. Rents would continue to rise. Young people would continue to live with their parents into their thirties. Investment funds would continue to buy buildings and extract maximum returns. The government had tried to intervene. Parliament had said no. The question now was whether the people in the tents would accept that answer.

Housing doesn't become more affordable through decrees; it becomes more affordable by building more homes.
— Juan Bravo, People's party lawmaker
What is behind these decrees is the desire to instil order and a sense of humanity in a market that – if we do not rein it in – will destroy our society.
— Pedro Sánchez, Spanish prime minister
Contattaci Domande frequenti