SpaceX Starship Booster Catch Aborted as Rocket Splashes Down in Ocean

It was diverted to the ocean, bursting into flames as it came down
SpaceX called off the booster catch at Starbase and sent the Super Heavy stage into the ocean instead.
Mark

The booster was supposed to be caught and wasn't. Is this a failure?

Mimi

It's an abort, which is different. SpaceX chose to divert the booster to the ocean, and the spokesperson said safety comes first because these maneuvers are still new.

Luke

Worth noting what we don't know. The reporting doesn't say why the catch was called off, only that it was prioritising safety.

Mark

So the reason is unexplained.

Luke

Right. The stated principle is clear, but the specific trigger isn't in what we have.

Mimi

And the booster has been caught on three earlier flights, so this isn't a first-time attempt that failed.

Mark

What's the bigger test then?

Mimi

The Ship. It reached orbit for the first time only in September and has never been caught by the chopsticks.

Luke

And that catch isn't promised. SpaceX said it would decide after assessing the vehicle in space, with a decision around 15:15 local time Saturday.

Mark

Why does NASA care so much?

Mimi

Starship is meant to become the lunar lander for a 2028 crewed landing, and Artemis III is planned for summer 2027.

Luke

Those dates are described as ambitious, and the piece says Starship's development has run slower than SpaceX intended. Blue Origin is delayed too, to early 2027.

  • The booster's planned catch was called off minutes after launch, and the stage plunged burning into the ocean.
  • Engineers are navigating maneuvers the company has never performed on these vehicles, weighing every step against safety.
  • The upper Ship reached orbit and is deploying 26 Starlink satellites while its own fate hangs on a second catch attempt.
  • A decision on that catch arrives Saturday afternoon, after 14 orbits and a return to the tower roughly 22.5 hours after liftoff.
  • The stakes ripple outward to NASA's 2028 Moon ambitions and the Artemis III timeline, where delays could widen a race with China.

On a Friday afternoon in Texas, a towering rocket lifted from the Boca Chica coast, and minutes later its lower stage was turned away from the arms waiting to receive it. SpaceX chose caution over spectacle, sending the booster into the sea, while the upper vessel continued into orbit with its cargo of satellites. The moment sits within a longer human effort to make spaceflight routine rather than extraordinary, where each hesitation is a reminder that the dream of reuse is still being earned one careful decision at a time.

On Friday afternoon at Starbase in Boca Chica, Texas, the 124-metre Starship lifted off under a clear plan. Six and a half minutes later, the mechanical arms known as chopsticks were meant to catch the bottom stage as it returned to the tower. They never got the chance. SpaceX called off the catch and sent the Super Heavy booster into the ocean, where it burned on the way down.

During the live broadcast, a company spokesperson explained that safety remained the first priority. The team is still testing manoeuvres it has never tried on these vehicles, and each one must be proven safe before it is attempted. The booster had already been caught three times on earlier flights, so the abort felt like a step backward, even if a deliberate one.

The upper Ship pressed on into orbit, deploying 26 satellites for the Starlink network. Its own story is not finished. If all goes to plan, it will circle the Earth 14 times and return to the tower about 22.5 hours after liftoff, when SpaceX will decide on a second catch attempt. That choice, expected around 21:15 GMT on Saturday, matters because the Ship has only recently reached orbit and has never been grabbed by the arms before.

Behind the flight lies a long dream of full reusability, the kind that could sharply lower the cost of reaching space. Analysts such as Prof Malcolm Macdonald see it as a possible turning point, though one successful flight alone would not settle the question. The stakes also reach NASA, which depends on Starship to help land astronauts on the Moon in 2028, and beyond the company's own shareholders. For now, everyone is waiting for Saturday's verdict.

At 16:45 local time on Friday, the 124-metre Starship rocket lifted off from SpaceX's Starbase launchpad in Boca Chica, Texas. Six and a half minutes later, the bottom stage was supposed to come back to the launch tower and be caught by the mechanical arms nicknamed chopsticks. It never got that far. SpaceX called off the catch and sent the Super Heavy booster down into the ocean, where it burst into flames on its way down.

During the live stream, a SpaceX spokesperson explained the decision. Safety is always the number one priority, the spokesperson said, and the company is still testing maneuvers it has never performed on these vehicles, so it is making sure each one can be done safely. The company has caught the Super Heavy booster on three earlier test flights, so the abort was a step back from something it has already shown it can do.

The upper stage, called the Ship, carried on toward space. It is deploying 26 satellites that will join the Starlink constellation, which provides high-speed internet from orbit. The plan calls for 14 orbits of the Earth, followed by a return to the launch tower 22.5 hours after liftoff, where a second catch may be attempted. SpaceX will decide whether to go ahead at about 15:15 local time (21:15 GMT) on Saturday.

That decision carries weight. The Ship only reached orbit for the first time in September, and it has never been grabbed by the chopsticks; on earlier flights it splashed down in the ocean. SpaceX said before the flight that it would try a catch only after carefully assessing the vehicle in space, and that there are several points during the flight where the stage can be diverted to the water if problems appear. This flight was meant to be the company's first attempt to fully recover its rocket, a step toward making Starship fully reusable so it can fly repeatedly and cut costs.

Reusability has been a long-held ambition for the company. In 2015 it became the first to land part of a rocket vertically, using a Falcon 9 booster. Falcon 9 rockets now fly more than 100 times a year, and reusing the bottom stage has sharply reduced launch costs. Prof Malcolm Macdonald, president of the Royal Aeronautical Society, says landing an entire Starship could take that further. Full reusability, he said, has the potential to fundamentally change the economics of accessing space. He added a caution: one successful flight will not prove the model, but it could mark a transition from showing that Starship can fly to showing how it could operate.

The stakes extend beyond SpaceX's own finances. The company went public earlier this year, so its shareholders will be watching closely, as will NASA. Starship's progress bears directly on NASA's plan to land humans on the Moon in 2028, a highly ambitious timeline. SpaceX holds a NASA contract to configure the Ship as a lander that would take astronauts down to the lunar surface.

It is not the only contractor. Blue Origin, owned by Jeff Bezos, has a contract to use its New Glenn rocket and lander for a Moon touchdown. Both companies are central to Artemis III, currently planned for summer 2027, in which four astronauts in NASA's Orion spacecraft will attempt to dock with both landers. Starship will need to make a lot of progress in the coming months to meet those commitments, since its development has been far slower than SpaceX intended.

Blue Origin has its own problems. Earlier this year its rocket exploded and destroyed its launchpad in Florida. The company had promised to be back in action by the end of this year, but its return to flight is now delayed to early 2027. NASA administrator Jared Isaacman has said America is in a race with China, which plans to land its taikonauts on the Moon by 2030. For now, the next marker is Saturday's decision on whether the Ship gets its catch attempt.

Full reusability has the potential to fundamentally change the economics of accessing space.
— Prof Malcolm Macdonald, president of the Royal Aeronautical Society
Safety is the number one priority, and SpaceX is still testing maneuvers it has not done before on these vehicles.
— SpaceX spokesperson (paraphrased), during the launch stream
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei BBC News ↗
Kontakt FAQ