On a Wednesday night in Florida, a Falcon 9 rocket rose from Cape Canaveral carrying sixty more satellites into the sky, each one a small step in a plan to wrap the globe in fast, low-delay internet. The launch arrived a single day after federal regulators allowed the network to place its next thousands of satellites closer to the Earth, a choice that pleases those who want better service and worries rivals who fear crowded skies. It is one more chapter in the old human effort to connect distant places, now written in orbit rather than on cable or ocean floor, and its meaning will unfold as th
SpaceX Launches 60 More Starlink Satellites, Recovers Booster on Its Seventh Flight
Starlink satellites are designed to burn up on re-entry
Mark
Sixty satellites went up, and the booster landed again. Is that the headline?
Mimi
It's the routine part. This booster has now flown and landed seven times, and it was the 81st successful recovery SpaceX counted. The less routine part is the FCC decision the day before.
Mark
What did the FCC approve, exactly?
Mimi
A modification to the Starlink plan. The next 2,814 satellites go to 570 km, after the first 1,584 are in orbit at more than 1,100 km.
Luke
And Amazon's Kuiper objected. What do we actually know about that objection?
Mimi
Only that rivals including Kuiper questioned the plan's validity and said the satellites would interfere with other systems. The report doesn't detail their evidence.
Luke
Then the interference claim is an allegation, not a finding. Same with SpaceX's side: better service and easier debris removal come from Anderson on SpaceX's own broadcast.
Mark
So the debris argument is the company's framing?
Mimi
Yes. She said low orbit lets gravity clear dead hardware, and that Starlink satellites are designed to burn up on re-entry. That's a design claim, not something the launch demonstrated.
Luke
Right, and nothing in the report says how many satellites fail to de-orbit as programmed. That's unknown here.
Mimi
Fair. The launch is confirmed; the long-term effects are still ahead of us.
O Pulso
- A Falcon 9 lifted off at 11:44 p.m. Eastern carrying 60 Starlink satellites, the 25th mission in the series.
- The FCC approved a plan to drop 2,814 future satellites to 570 km, a day before launch.
- Amazon's Kuiper and other rivals are challenging the approval, arguing the satellites would interfere with comparable systems.
- The first-stage booster landed on the drone ship Just Read The Instructions, marking SpaceX's 81st orbital-class recovery.
- SpaceX argues lower orbits improve service and let debris fall back to Earth faster, since Starlink satellites burn up on re-entry.
- The next test is whether the lower-altitude deployment proceeds smoothly and whether rivals press their objections further.
On a Wednesday night in Florida, a Falcon 9 rocket rose from Cape Canaveral carrying sixty more satellites into the sky, each one a small step in a plan to wrap the globe in fast, low-delay internet. The launch arrived a single day after federal regulators allowed the network to place its next thousands of satellites closer to the Earth, a choice that pleases those who want better service and worries rivals who fear crowded skies. It is one more chapter in the old human effort to connect distant places, now written in orbit rather than on cable or ocean floor, and its meaning will unfold as the satellites settle into their new paths.
At 11:44 p.m. Eastern on Wednesday, a two-stage Falcon 9 rose from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, its roughly 70-meter frame carrying 60 more satellites for SpaceX's Starlink network. Weather had looked favorable, and the launch went off on schedule.
Nine minutes later, the first-stage booster touched down on the drone ship Just Read The Instructions, a platform about the size of a football field. The second stage carried on and released its payload about 550 km above the Earth. Jessie Anderson, SpaceX's lead manufacturing engineer, confirmed the success during the live broadcast. It was the company's 81st orbital-class recovery and the seventh flight for this booster.
The launch followed a regulatory decision the day before. The Federal Communications Commission approved a change allowing the next 2,814 satellites to fly at 570 km, below the initial batch's altitude of more than 1,100 km. Rivals, including Amazon's Kuiper, argued the plan was flawed and that the satellites would interfere with similar systems.
Anderson defended the lower orbit, saying it delivers better service and speeds debris removal. Starlink satellites are built to burn up in the atmosphere, unlike traditional communication satellites that she said could circle the Earth for centuries.
What comes next is how the lower deployment unfolds under the FCC's approval, and whether Kuiper and others continue their challenge.
At 11:44 p.m. Eastern on Wednesday, a two-stage Falcon 9 rocket, about 70 meters tall, lifted off on schedule from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida. It carried 60 more satellites for SpaceX's Starlink Internet network. Weather had been 90% favorable, according to a tweet the company posted 30 minutes before launch.
Roughly nine minutes after liftoff, the first-stage booster came down on the drone ship Just Read The Instructions, a landing platform about the size of a football field. The second stage kept going and released its payload into orbit at about 550 km above the Earth.
Jessie Anderson, SpaceX's lead manufacturing engineer, confirmed the result during the company's live broadcast. By her count it was the company's 81st successful recovery of an orbital-class rocket. It was also the seventh flight and seventh landing for this particular booster.
The mission was the 25th in the Starlink series. The constellation is part of SpaceX's plan to offer high-speed, low-latency Internet service around the world.
The launch came one day after a regulatory decision. On Tuesday, the Federal Communications Commission approved a modification to SpaceX's Starlink plan. Under the change, the next 2,814 satellites will be placed at 570 km. That comes after the initial batch of 1,584 satellites reaches orbit at an altitude of more than 1,100 km.
The plan did not go unchallenged. Competing companies, including Kuiper, the Amazon subsidiary, questioned its validity and argued that the satellites would interfere with other systems of the same kind.
Anderson addressed the altitude question during the broadcast. More satellites at a lower orbit, she said, provide better service. She also said low orbit helps with debris removal. If a satellite does not de-orbit as programmed at the end of its useful life, Earth's natural gravitational pull will eventually remove the hardware from space.
She contrasted this with traditional communication satellites at slightly higher orbits, which she said will circle the Earth for hundreds of years. Starlink satellites, she added, are not designed to survive re-entry the way Falcon 9 rockets are. They are built to burn up in the atmosphere.
What to watch next is how the lower-altitude deployment proceeds under the FCC's approval, and whether Kuiper and other rivals keep pressing their interference objections.
Citações Notáveis
This makes our 81st successful recovery of an orbital-class rocket and again the seventh flight and seventh landing for this booster.— Jessie Anderson, SpaceX lead manufacturing engineer
Quer a matéria completa?
Leia o original em UPI News ↗
Science & Space