On a Wednesday night in late April, a Falcon 9 lifted from Cape Canaveral carrying sixty more Starlink satellites, another small step in a project that aims to wrap the globe in fast, low-latency internet. The booster returned to a drone ship at sea, a quiet reminder that reuse is becoming ordinary in an endeavor once thought fantastical. The launch came a day after regulators approved a plan to place thousands of future satellites at lower altitudes, a decision that promises better service and faster debris cleanup, yet is contested by rivals who fear crowding in shared skies.
SpaceX Launches 60 More Starlink Satellites as FCC Approves Lower-Orbit Constellation Plan
Sixty satellites, one booster on its seventh landing, and a rival objection
Mark
Sixty satellites at once, and a booster that has now flown seven times. Why does the landing matter as much as the launch?
Mimi
Because reuse is the engine of the whole project. This was the 25th Starlink mission, and the booster's seventh flight and landing. The 81st recovery overall shows it's routine now.
Mark
And the FCC decision a day earlier?
Mimi
It approved moving the next 2,814 satellites to 570 kilometers, after the first 1,584 are up at more than 1,100.
Luke
Worth noting the satellites in this launch went to about 550 kilometers. The report doesn't say how that relates to the approved shells, so I wouldn't connect them.
Mark
Amazon's Kuiper objected. What was the objection?
Mimi
That the plan was questionable and the satellites would interfere with other systems like them.
Luke
Right, but that's the critics' claim. The report gives no evidence of actual interference, and no response from the FCC on those objections.
Mark
SpaceX says low orbit helps clean up debris.
Mimi
Anderson said gravity pulls dead hardware down, and the satellites are designed to burn up on re-entry.
Luke
That's SpaceX's own description, delivered on its own broadcast. It's a design claim, not an independently verified outcome.
Mark
So what's settled?
Luke
The launch, the landing, and the FCC approval. The interference question remains open.
Le Pouls
- A Falcon 9 thundered off the Cape Canaveral pad at 11:44 p.m. Eastern, carrying sixty satellites bound for low-Earth orbit.
- The first-stage booster touched down on the drone ship Just Read The Instructions, its seventh flight and seventh landing.
- A day earlier the FCC cleared a plan to lower 2,814 future satellites to 570 kilometers, and the decision ignited objections.
- Amazon's Kuiper unit argues the denser low shell risks interference with other systems, leaving the question open.
- Each satellite unfurls its solar arrays and uses ion thrusters over days and weeks to reach its operational orbit, and the lower shell remains the thing to watch.
On a Wednesday night in late April, a Falcon 9 lifted from Cape Canaveral carrying sixty more Starlink satellites, another small step in a project that aims to wrap the globe in fast, low-latency internet. The booster returned to a drone ship at sea, a quiet reminder that reuse is becoming ordinary in an endeavor once thought fantastical. The launch came a day after regulators approved a plan to place thousands of future satellites at lower altitudes, a decision that promises better service and faster debris cleanup, yet is contested by rivals who fear crowding in shared skies.
At 11:44 p.m. Eastern on Wednesday, April 28, a Falcon 9 rose from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station right on schedule, carrying 60 Starlink internet satellites. About nine minutes later the first-stage booster settled onto the drone ship Just Read The Instructions in the Atlantic, the seventh flight and seventh landing for that booster. The second stage kept climbing and, roughly an hour after liftoff, released the satellites about 550 kilometers above the Earth.
Jessie Anderson, SpaceX's lead manufacturing engineer, narrated the mission on the live broadcast. It was the 81st orbital-class recovery for the company and the 25th Starlink mission, part of a constellation meant to deliver high-speed internet worldwide. The satellites will soon deploy their solar arrays, then spread out and use ion thrusters to climb to their working orbit over the coming weeks.
The launch followed a regulatory decision the day before. The Federal Communications Commission approved a revised plan under which the next 2,814 satellites would operate at 570 kilometers, after the first 1,584 reach higher orbits above 1,100 kilometers. Anderson argued that denser lower orbits deliver better service and clear debris faster, since satellites that fail to de-orbit fall naturally, unlike older craft that can circle for centuries. Starlink satellites are built to burn up on re-entry. Competitors, Amazon's Kuiper among them, dispute the plan and warn of interference, and that dispute is still unsettled.
At 11:44 p.m. Eastern on Wednesday, April 28, a Falcon 9 rocket left the pad at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida, right on schedule. The two-stage vehicle, about 70 meters tall, was carrying 60 Starlink internet satellites. SpaceX had tweeted half an hour earlier that the weather was 90% favorable for the mission.
About nine minutes after liftoff, the first-stage booster came back down onto a drone ship in the Atlantic, a vessel the size of a football field and named Just Read The Instructions. The second stage kept climbing. Roughly an hour after launch, it released the 60 satellites into orbit at about 550 kilometers above the Earth.
Jessie Anderson, SpaceX's lead manufacturing engineer, narrated the launch on the company's live broadcast. She said it was SpaceX's 81st successful recovery of an orbital-class rocket, and the seventh flight and seventh landing for this particular booster. The mission was the 25th in the Starlink program, which aims to provide high-speed, low-latency internet service worldwide from a constellation of satellites.
Anderson also described what happens next for the satellites. They deploy their solar arrays shortly after release. Over the following days and weeks they spread apart from one another and use onboard ion thrusters to climb to their operational orbit.
The launch came one day after a regulatory decision. On Tuesday, the Federal Communications Commission approved a modified Starlink plan. Under it, the next 2,814 satellites SpaceX launches would operate at 570 kilometers, rather than higher. That change applies after the initial 1,584 satellites are placed in orbit at an altitude of more than 1,100 kilometers.
The plan drew criticism from competitors. Amazon's Kuiper subsidiary was among the companies that questioned its validity and argued that the satellites would interfere with other systems of this kind.
On the broadcast, Anderson made SpaceX's case for the lower orbits. She said that more satellites at lower altitude provide better service. She also said low orbit helps with debris removal: if a satellite does not de-orbit as programmed at the end of its useful life, Earth's natural gravitational pull will bring its hardware down anyway. She contrasted this with traditional communication satellites at slightly higher orbits, which she said can circle the Earth for hundreds of years.
She added that, unlike Falcon 9 rockets, Starlink satellites are not designed to survive re-entry. They are built to burn up in the atmosphere. With the FCC approval in hand and rivals still raising interference objections, the lower-orbit shell is the part of the plan to watch.
Citations marquantes
Starlink satellites are not designed to survive re-entry; they are meant to burn up in the atmosphere.— Jessie Anderson, SpaceX lead manufacturing engineer (paraphrased)
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur UPI News ↗
Science & Space